APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20140.00Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCNeutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20160.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20190.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20200.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20210.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20220.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCNeutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024N/CNeutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Neutral BSC03% of residents who feel its important for them to feel part of their local communityAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NANeutral BSC03% of residents who feel its important for them to feel part of their local communityAnnualFinancial Year2012/201370.00Neutral BSC03% of residents who feel its important for them to feel part of their local communityAnnualFinancial Year2013/201474.00Neutral BSC03% of residents who feel its important for them to feel part of their local communityAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCNeutral BSC03% of residents who feel its important for them to feel part of their local communityAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCNeutral BSC04% of CYC residents stating it's important residents can influence decisions in their local areaAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NAUp is Good BSC04% of CYC residents stating it's important residents can influence decisions in their local areaAnnualFinancial Year2012/201375.00Up is Good BSC04% of CYC residents stating it's important residents can influence decisions in their local areaAnnualFinancial Year2013/201486.00Up is Good BSC04% of CYC residents stating it's important residents can influence decisions in their local areaAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BSC04% of CYC residents stating it's important residents can influence decisions in their local areaAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS001% of residents who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NAUp is Good BYS001% of residents who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201329.00Up is Good BYS001% of residents who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201424.00Up is Good BYS001% of residents who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS001% of residents who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS053% of residents who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live - Satisfied (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NAUp is Good BYS053% of residents who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live - Satisfied (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201391.00Up is Good BYS053% of residents who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live - Satisfied (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201483.00Up is Good BYS053% of residents who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live - Satisfied (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS053% of residents who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live - Satisfied (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS079% of residents who agree that they belong to their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NAUp is Good BYS079% of residents who agree that they belong to their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201355.00Up is Good BYS079% of residents who agree that they belong to their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201454.00Up is Good BYS079% of residents who agree that they belong to their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS079% of residents who agree that they belong to their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS105% of residents who agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NAUp is Good BYS105% of residents who agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201373.00Up is Good BYS105% of residents who agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201458.00Up is Good BYS105% of residents who agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS105% of residents who agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS131% of residents who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NAUp is Good BYS131% of residents who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201374.00Up is Good BYS131% of residents who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201480.00Up is Good BYS131% of residents who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS131% of residents who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS254% of residents who volunteer at least once a month (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NAUp is Good BYS254% of residents who volunteer at least once a month (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201326.00Up is Good BYS254% of residents who volunteer at least once a month (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201433.00Up is Good BYS254% of residents who volunteer at least once a month (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS254% of residents who volunteer at least once a month (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS300% of residents who agree their local area is a safe place to live (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NAUp is Good BYS300% of residents who agree their local area is a safe place to live (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201379.00Up is Good BYS300% of residents who agree their local area is a safe place to live (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201479.00Up is Good BYS300% of residents who agree their local area is a safe place to live (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS300% of residents who agree their local area is a safe place to live (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS301% of residents that think CYC/partners are doing well at reducing crime and anti social behaviourAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NAUp is Good BYS301% of residents that think CYC/partners are doing well at reducing crime and anti social behaviourAnnualFinancial Year2012/201356.00Up is Good BYS301% of residents that think CYC/partners are doing well at reducing crime and anti social behaviourAnnualFinancial Year2013/201448.00Up is Good BYS301% of residents that think CYC/partners are doing well at reducing crime and anti social behaviourAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS301% of residents that think CYC/partners are doing well at reducing crime and anti social behaviourAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS302% of residents that think CYC/partners are working well to make communities saferAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NAUp is Good BYS302% of residents that think CYC/partners are working well to make communities saferAnnualFinancial Year2012/201354.00Up is Good BYS302% of residents that think CYC/partners are working well to make communities saferAnnualFinancial Year2013/201445.00Up is Good BYS302% of residents that think CYC/partners are working well to make communities saferAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS302% of residents that think CYC/partners are working well to make communities saferAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20098.62Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20107.42Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20117.93Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20127.99Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20137.88Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20147.97Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20158.18Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20168.64Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20178.90Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189.09Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20198.88Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20209.17Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20219.72Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20229.84Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20239.42Up is Bad PHOF15% of adult social care users who have as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2011/201245.80Up is Good PHOF15% of adult social care users who have as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2012/201342.70Up is Good PHOF15% of adult social care users who have as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2013/201443.00Up is Good PHOF15% of adult social care users who have as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2014/201546.60Up is Good PHOF15% of adult social care users who have as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2015/201645.80Up is Good PHOF15% of adult social care users who have as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2016/201749.50Up is Good PHOF26Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20121.11Up is Bad PHOF26Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20131.11Up is Bad PHOF26Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20140.94Up is Bad PHOF26Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20150.76Up is Bad PHOF26Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20160.65Up is Bad PHOF26Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.70Up is Bad PHOF26Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.50Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2003/2004170.80Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2004/2005162.60Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2005/2006160.90Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2006/2007152.80Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2007/2008147.60Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2008/2009136.80Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2009/2010131.70Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2010/2011132.10Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012137.40Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013141.00Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014147.10Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015139.20Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016135.30Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017126.60Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018130.50Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019132.60Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020135.60Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021144.40Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022153.20Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023158.60Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024152.40Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/2004186.20Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/2005170.30Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/2006157.40Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/2007147.50Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/2008138.80Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/2009127.20Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/2010117.80Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/2011116.60Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012119.30Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013114.10Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014115.40Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015101.60Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201698.00Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201792.80Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201894.50Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201996.00Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202091.70Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202192.50Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202291.90Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023102.30Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202496.70Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/2004190.00Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/2005180.40Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/2006188.20Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/2007175.60Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/2008170.00Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/2009154.90Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/2010154.80Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/2011152.50Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012160.10Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013163.60Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014170.80Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015162.70Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016154.00Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017145.50Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018147.80Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019142.80Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020146.40Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021141.70Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022152.60Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023144.70Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024141.30Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/200413.50Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/200516.10Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/200618.00Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/200720.70Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/200822.70Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/200920.30Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/201018.60Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/201115.00Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/201215.40Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/201316.70Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201416.10Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201516.40Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201618.40Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201720.20Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201823.20Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201920.90Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202018.50Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202116.40Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202215.70Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202322.10Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202425.50Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/200442.70Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/200536.20Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/200635.70Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/200735.50Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/200833.50Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/200933.90Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/201035.10Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/201136.60Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/201236.80Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/201335.10Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201437.20Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201535.10Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201632.00Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201729.90Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201831.00Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201937.10Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202035.10Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202134.30Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202225.10Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202326.80Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202428.70Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2003/20047.10Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2004/20057.80Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2005/20067.50Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20078.20Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20089.00Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200911.60Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201011.80Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201110.90Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20128.30Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.20Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20145.50Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20154.20Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20165.80Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20175.90Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20186.70Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20198.40Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20209.00Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20219.90Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20226.90Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20239.20Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202411.20Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2013/20142623.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2014/20152680.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2015/20162717.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2016/20172788.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2017/20182788.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2018/20192779.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2019/20202834.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2020/20212927.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2021/20222954.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2022/20233004.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2023/20243092.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2024/20253129.00Up is Bad PP11% certificate applications dealt with within 5 days of receiptMonthlyFinancial Year2011/2012100.00Up is Good PP11% certificate applications dealt with within 5 days of receiptMonthlyFinancial Year2012/2013100.00Up is Good PP11% certificate applications dealt with within 5 days of receiptMonthlyFinancial Year2013/2014100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Up is Good PP11% certificate applications dealt with within 5 days of receiptMonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Up is Good PP11% certificate applications dealt with within 5 days of receiptMonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good PP11% certificate applications dealt with within 5 days of receiptMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NA100.00100.00100.00100.00NANANANANANANANANANANANAUp is Good SF3-A01Number of Supporting Families cases (Families identified with 3 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/2024386.00NC286.00330.00386.00Up is Good SF3-A01Number of Supporting Families cases (Families identified with 3 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/2025446.00518.00559.00Up is Good SF3-A02Number of Supporting Families cases On-Programme - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/2024350.00NC254.00303.00350.00Up is Good SF3-A02Number of Supporting Families cases On-Programme - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/2025403.00466.00502.00Up is Good SF3-A03Number of Supporting Families cases who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202488.00NC24.0052.0088.00Up is Good SF3-A03Number of Supporting Families cases who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/2025108.00174.00199.00Up is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201391.00Up is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201483.00Up is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201789.8491.90NC89.84NCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201889.9491.23NC89.94NCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201988.6188.09NC88.61NCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202084.4788.45NC84.47NCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202184.9087.0184.90NCNCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202284.3884.00NC84.38NCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202382.1884.7382.18Up is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202479.6881.4479.68Up is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202580.4481.0080.44Up is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202681.67Up is Good TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/20134.00Up is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201410.00Up is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20176.185.60NC6.18NCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20186.296.80NC6.29NCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20198.027.80NC8.02NCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202010.128.81NC10.12NCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/20217.675.227.67NCNCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20229.7410.00NC9.74NCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202310.6410.2410.64Up is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202413.1014.4313.10Up is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202512.2213.1812.22Up is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202611.67Up is Bad TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201363.00Up is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201454.00Up is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201765.5465.60NC65.54NCUp is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201862.1364.76NC62.13NCUp is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201957.3360.29NC57.33NCUp is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202051.0055.56NC51.00NCUp is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202150.5052.4350.50NCNCUp is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202250.5853.00NC50.58NCUp is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202347.3048.1847.30Up is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202443.8441.1343.84Up is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202548.4641.4748.46Up is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202647.67Up is Good TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201319.00Up is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201429.00Up is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201720.3220.80NC20.32NCUp is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201822.8020.26NC22.80NCUp is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201922.1023.05NC22.10NCUp is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202019.6521.62NC19.65NCUp is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202122.5219.7122.52NCNCUp is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202227.8024.00NC27.80NCUp is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202330.8528.7930.85Up is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202426.5834.4126.58Up is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202529.4928.0829.49Up is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202632.12Up is Bad TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201345.00Up is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201442.00Up is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201745.3347.20NC45.33NCUp is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201845.4548.57NC45.45NCUp is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201943.1442.68NC43.14NCUp is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202038.0743.00NC38.07NCUp is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202134.4138.5234.41NCNCUp is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202236.7339.00NC36.73NCUp is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202333.2537.5033.25Up is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202430.9833.2530.98Up is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202533.9232.3033.92Up is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202635.31Up is Good TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201325.00Up is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201431.00Up is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201724.0622.20NC24.06NCUp is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201823.8921.10NC23.89NCUp is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201917.2123.51NC17.21NCUp is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202019.7619.00NC19.76NCUp is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202127.9725.6427.97NCNCUp is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202223.2722.00NC23.27NCUp is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202325.8324.0525.83Up is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202425.0028.0125.00Up is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202526.5827.9126.58Up is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202625.52Up is Bad TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201392.00Up is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201489.00Up is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201792.2091.90NC92.20NCUp is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201891.7092.65NC91.70NCUp is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201989.6391.51NC89.63NCUp is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202087.5387.07NC87.53NCUp is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202185.9387.5885.93NCNCUp is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202284.9488.00NC84.94NCUp is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202383.4283.4683.42Up is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202480.3883.2480.38Up is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202579.9584.7879.95Up is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202679.41Up is Good TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/20134.00Up is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20146.00Up is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20174.403.10NC4.40NCUp is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20185.534.01NC5.53NCUp is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20196.704.46NC6.70NCUp is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20205.878.28NC5.87NCUp is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/20216.424.876.42NCNCUp is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20229.077.00NC9.07NCUp is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202310.559.8110.55Up is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202410.0810.6410.08Up is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202513.119.1913.11Up is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202611.03Up is Bad TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201440.00Up is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201760.8161.70NC60.81NCUp is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201850.3362.81NC50.33NCUp is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201951.3150.64NC51.31NCUp is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202051.5053.29NC51.50NCUp is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202248.4452.00NC48.44NCUp is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202342.4050.2942.40Up is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202447.1145.3347.11Up is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202541.6246.2141.62Up is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202640.77Up is Good TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201411.00Up is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20177.477.00NC7.47NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201810.687.35NC10.68NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20197.2110.04NC7.21NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20208.258.03NC8.25NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202210.5110.00NC10.51NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202311.4711.9511.47Up is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20249.6414.139.64Up is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202511.179.4011.17Up is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202611.02Up is Bad TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201370.00Up is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201474.00Up is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201789.2088.80NC89.20NCUp is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201886.0589.53NC86.05NCUp is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201991.9288.61NC91.92NCUp is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202087.9488.73NC87.94NCUp is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202288.8290.00NC88.82NCUp is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202387.8391.7187.83Up is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202489.8988.3989.89Up is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202589.0389.4789.03Up is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202688.95Up is Good TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201330.00Up is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201426.00Up is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201710.4010.80NC10.40NCUp is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201813.099.58NC13.09NCUp is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20197.219.92NC7.21NCUp is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202011.5610.45NC11.56NCUp is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20229.809.00NC9.80NCUp is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202310.857.3210.85Up is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20248.9911.618.99Up is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/20259.699.749.69Up is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/20268.16Up is Bad TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201355.00Up is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201454.00Up is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201774.7075.20NC74.70NCUp is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201875.2778.44NC75.27NCUp is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201980.2276.41NC80.22NCUp is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202077.7878.06NC77.78NCUp is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202169.3870.2169.38NCNCUp is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202278.0976.00NC78.09NCUp is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202377.9078.4377.90Up is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202477.2672.8977.26Up is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202573.4775.2073.47Up is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202674.93Up is Good TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201345.00Up is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201446.00Up is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201725.1024.40NC25.10NCUp is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201823.0319.11NC23.03NCUp is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201919.3321.71NC19.33NCUp is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202021.7120.46NC21.71NCUp is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202129.8828.3329.88NCNCUp is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202220.4923.00NC20.49NCUp is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202320.2221.3720.22Up is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202421.5726.8421.57Up is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202525.2624.2725.26Up is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202617.33Up is Bad TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201373.00Up is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201458.00Up is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201770.1169.50NC70.11NCUp is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201872.8475.24NC72.84NCUp is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201968.4775.06NC68.47NCUp is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202061.8862.17NC61.88NCUp is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202155.8055.3055.80NCNCUp is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202265.5665.00NC65.56NCUp is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202366.6761.7666.67Up is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202469.2365.0069.23Up is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202566.0867.1166.08Up is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202661.68Up is Good TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/20138.00Up is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201415.00Up is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20179.449.40NC9.44NCUp is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201811.856.55NC11.85NCUp is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20196.918.86NC6.91NCUp is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20208.919.20NC8.91NCUp is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202111.859.6211.85NCNCUp is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20228.228.00NC8.22NCUp is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20236.9810.136.98Up is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20247.427.117.42Up is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/20255.828.755.82Up is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/20268.40Up is Bad TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201329.00Up is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201424.00Up is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201725.6529.00NC25.65NCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201826.8728.41NC26.87NCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201928.9525.68NC28.95NCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202029.0627.37NC29.06NCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202127.3029.5527.30NCNCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202224.2627.00NC24.26NCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202320.9425.6720.94Up is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202421.3722.7921.37Up is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202520.9222.1120.92Up is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202619.41Up is Good TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201342.00Up is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201449.00Up is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201739.9639.50NC39.96NCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201840.9437.22NC40.94NCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201941.0143.16NC41.01NCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202037.9339.30NC37.93NCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202140.9439.8040.94NCNCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202247.1443.00NC47.14NCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202348.6947.1348.69Up is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202450.9651.7450.96Up is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202550.0050.0050.00Up is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202643.62Up is Bad TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201375.00Up is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201486.00Up is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201790.8588.20NC90.85NCUp is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201889.9190.27NC89.91NCUp is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201992.2489.66NC92.24NCUp is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202090.5991.58NC90.59NCUp is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202290.3491.00NC90.34NCUp is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202392.3993.6092.39Up is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202491.4692.9991.46Up is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202590.8492.3590.84Up is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202690.93Up is Good TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201325.00Up is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201414.00Up is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20177.3610.50NC7.36NCUp is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20188.377.74NC8.37NCUp is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20196.218.02NC6.21NCUp is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20208.176.74NC8.17NCUp is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20227.897.00NC7.89NCUp is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20236.304.466.30Up is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20246.345.126.34Up is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/20255.094.755.09Up is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/20264.80Up is Bad TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201374.00Up is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201480.00Up is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201777.0377.00NC77.03NCUp is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201870.5174.72NC70.51NCUp is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201977.1973.21NC77.19NCUp is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202079.7573.35NC79.75NCUp is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202274.3679.00NC74.36NCUp is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202372.9275.8872.92Up is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202476.7376.1376.73Up is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202573.2176.5373.21Up is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202669.73Up is Good TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201311.00Up is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201410.00Up is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201712.8011.50NC12.80NCUp is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201817.5214.41NC17.52NCUp is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201910.3114.14NC10.31NCUp is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202010.0012.60NC10.00NCUp is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202211.449.00NC11.44NCUp is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202311.2012.4511.20Up is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202410.539.0210.53Up is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202511.229.0711.22Up is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202616.87Up is Bad TF2-A01Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201552.0052.00Up is Good TF2-A01Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016500.00299.00349.00377.00500.00Up is Good TF2-A01Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/2017742.00547.00581.00617.00742.00Up is Good TF2-A01Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018891.00761.00786.00815.00891.00Up is Good TF2-A01Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20191078.00934.00965.001025.001078.00Up is Good TF2-A01Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20201328.001155.001242.001287.001328.00Up is Good TF2-A01Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/20211440.001360.001386.001406.001440.00Up is Good TF2-A01Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20221574.001481.001513.001542.001574.00Up is Good TF2-A01Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20231648.001635.001648.001648.001648.00Up is Good TF2-A01Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20241648.00Up is Good TF2-A02% of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20150.000.00Up is Good TF2-A02% of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20160.000.000.000.000.00Up is Good TF2-A02% of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20176.000.001.003.006.00Up is Good TF2-A02% of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201810.006.006.006.0010.00Up is Good TF2-A02% of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201920.0010.0014.0015.0020.00Up is Good TF2-A02% of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202031.0024.0026.0028.0031.00Up is Good TF2-A02% of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202147.0036.0040.0044.0047.00Up is Good TF2-A02% of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202250.0043.0045.0047.0050.00Up is Good TF2-A02% of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202359.0050.0054.0057.0059.00Up is Good TF2-A02% of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202461.00Up is Good APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20140.00Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCNeutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20160.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20190.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20200.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20210.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20220.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCNeutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024N/CNeutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Neutral BSC03% of residents who feel its important for them to feel part of their local communityAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NANeutral BSC03% of residents who feel its important for them to feel part of their local communityAnnualFinancial Year2012/201370.00Neutral BSC03% of residents who feel its important for them to feel part of their local communityAnnualFinancial Year2013/201474.00Neutral BSC03% of residents who feel its important for them to feel part of their local communityAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCNeutral BSC03% of residents who feel its important for them to feel part of their local communityAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCNeutral BSC04% of CYC residents stating it's important residents can influence decisions in their local areaAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NAUp is Good BSC04% of CYC residents stating it's important residents can influence decisions in their local areaAnnualFinancial Year2012/201375.00Up is Good BSC04% of CYC residents stating it's important residents can influence decisions in their local areaAnnualFinancial Year2013/201486.00Up is Good BSC04% of CYC residents stating it's important residents can influence decisions in their local areaAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BSC04% of CYC residents stating it's important residents can influence decisions in their local areaAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS001% of residents who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NAUp is Good BYS001% of residents who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201329.00Up is Good BYS001% of residents who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201424.00Up is Good BYS001% of residents who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS001% of residents who agree that they can influence decisions in their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS053% of residents who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live - Satisfied (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NAUp is Good BYS053% of residents who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live - Satisfied (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201391.00Up is Good BYS053% of residents who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live - Satisfied (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201483.00Up is Good BYS053% of residents who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live - Satisfied (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS053% of residents who are satisfied with their local area as a place to live - Satisfied (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS079% of residents who agree that they belong to their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NAUp is Good BYS079% of residents who agree that they belong to their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201355.00Up is Good BYS079% of residents who agree that they belong to their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201454.00Up is Good BYS079% of residents who agree that they belong to their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS079% of residents who agree that they belong to their local area - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS105% of residents who agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NAUp is Good BYS105% of residents who agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201373.00Up is Good BYS105% of residents who agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201458.00Up is Good BYS105% of residents who agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS105% of residents who agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS131% of residents who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NAUp is Good BYS131% of residents who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201374.00Up is Good BYS131% of residents who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201480.00Up is Good BYS131% of residents who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS131% of residents who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violence - Agree (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS254% of residents who volunteer at least once a month (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NAUp is Good BYS254% of residents who volunteer at least once a month (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201326.00Up is Good BYS254% of residents who volunteer at least once a month (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201433.00Up is Good BYS254% of residents who volunteer at least once a month (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS254% of residents who volunteer at least once a month (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS300% of residents who agree their local area is a safe place to live (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NAUp is Good BYS300% of residents who agree their local area is a safe place to live (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201379.00Up is Good BYS300% of residents who agree their local area is a safe place to live (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201479.00Up is Good BYS300% of residents who agree their local area is a safe place to live (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS300% of residents who agree their local area is a safe place to live (All Responses)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS301% of residents that think CYC/partners are doing well at reducing crime and anti social behaviourAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NAUp is Good BYS301% of residents that think CYC/partners are doing well at reducing crime and anti social behaviourAnnualFinancial Year2012/201356.00Up is Good BYS301% of residents that think CYC/partners are doing well at reducing crime and anti social behaviourAnnualFinancial Year2013/201448.00Up is Good BYS301% of residents that think CYC/partners are doing well at reducing crime and anti social behaviourAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS301% of residents that think CYC/partners are doing well at reducing crime and anti social behaviourAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good BYS302% of residents that think CYC/partners are working well to make communities saferAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NAUp is Good BYS302% of residents that think CYC/partners are working well to make communities saferAnnualFinancial Year2012/201354.00Up is Good BYS302% of residents that think CYC/partners are working well to make communities saferAnnualFinancial Year2013/201445.00Up is Good BYS302% of residents that think CYC/partners are working well to make communities saferAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good BYS302% of residents that think CYC/partners are working well to make communities saferAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20098.62Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20107.42Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20117.93Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20127.99Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20137.88Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20147.97Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20158.18Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20168.64Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20178.90Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189.09Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20198.88Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20209.17Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20219.72Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20229.84Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20239.42Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20248.79Up is Bad CJGE172Housing affordability (lower quartile house prices to earnings ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad PHOF15% of adult social care users who have as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2011/201245.80Up is Good PHOF15% of adult social care users who have as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2012/201342.70Up is Good PHOF15% of adult social care users who have as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2013/201443.00Up is Good PHOF15% of adult social care users who have as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2014/201546.60Up is Good PHOF15% of adult social care users who have as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2015/201645.80Up is Good PHOF15% of adult social care users who have as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2016/201749.50Up is Good PHOF26Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20121.11Up is Bad PHOF26Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20131.11Up is Bad PHOF26Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20140.94Up is Bad PHOF26Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20150.76Up is Bad PHOF26Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20160.65Up is Bad PHOF26Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.70Up is Bad PHOF26Statutory homelessness - households in temporary accommodation (per 1,000 estimated total households)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.50Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2003/2004170.80Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2004/2005162.60Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2005/2006160.90Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2006/2007152.80Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2007/2008147.60Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2008/2009136.80Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2009/2010131.70Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2010/2011132.10Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012137.40Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013141.00Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014147.10Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015139.20Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016135.30Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017126.60Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018130.50Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019132.60Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020135.60Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021144.40Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022153.20Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023158.60Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024152.40Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/2004186.20Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/2005170.30Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/2006157.40Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/2007147.50Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/2008138.80Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/2009127.20Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/2010117.80Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/2011116.60Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012119.30Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013114.10Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014115.40Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015101.60Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201698.00Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201792.80Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201894.50Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201996.00Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202091.70Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202192.50Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202291.90Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023102.30Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202496.70Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/2004190.00Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/2005180.40Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/2006188.20Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/2007175.60Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/2008170.00Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/2009154.90Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/2010154.80Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/2011152.50Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012160.10Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013163.60Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014170.80Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015162.70Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016154.00Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017145.50Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018147.80Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019142.80Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020146.40Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021141.70Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022152.60Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023144.70Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024141.30Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/200413.50Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/200516.10Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/200618.00Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/200720.70Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/200822.70Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/200920.30Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/201018.60Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/201115.00Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/201215.40Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/201316.70Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201416.10Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201516.40Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201618.40Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201720.20Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201823.20Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201920.90Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202018.50Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202116.40Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202215.70Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202322.10Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202425.50Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/200442.70Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/200536.20Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/200635.70Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/200735.50Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/200833.50Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/200933.90Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/201035.10Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/201136.60Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/201236.80Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/201335.10Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201437.20Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201535.10Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201632.00Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201729.90Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201831.00Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201937.10Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202035.10Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202134.30Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202225.10Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202326.80Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202428.70Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2003/20047.10Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2004/20057.80Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2005/20067.50Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20078.20Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20089.00Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200911.60Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201011.80Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201110.90Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20128.30Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.20Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20145.50Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20154.20Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20165.80Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20175.90Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20186.70Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20198.40Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20209.00Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20219.90Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20226.90Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20239.20Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202411.20Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2013/20142623.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2014/20152680.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2015/20162717.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2016/20172788.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2017/20182788.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2018/20192779.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2019/20202834.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2020/20212927.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2021/20222954.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2022/20233004.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2023/20243092.00Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2024/20253129.00Up is Bad PP11% certificate applications dealt with within 5 days of receiptMonthlyFinancial Year2011/2012100.00Up is Good PP11% certificate applications dealt with within 5 days of receiptMonthlyFinancial Year2012/2013100.00Up is Good PP11% certificate applications dealt with within 5 days of receiptMonthlyFinancial Year2013/2014100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Up is Good PP11% certificate applications dealt with within 5 days of receiptMonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Up is Good PP11% certificate applications dealt with within 5 days of receiptMonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good PP11% certificate applications dealt with within 5 days of receiptMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NA100.00100.00100.00100.00NANANANANANANANANANANANAUp is Good SF3-A01Number of Supporting Families cases (Families identified with 3 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/2024386.00NC286.00330.00386.00Up is Good SF3-A01Number of Supporting Families cases (Families identified with 3 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/2025446.00518.00559.00Up is Good SF3-A02Number of Supporting Families cases On-Programme - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/2024350.00NC254.00303.00350.00Up is Good SF3-A02Number of Supporting Families cases On-Programme - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/2025403.00466.00502.00Up is Good SF3-A03Number of Supporting Families cases who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202488.00NC24.0052.0088.00Up is Good SF3-A03Number of Supporting Families cases who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/2025108.00174.00199.00Up is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201391.00Up is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201483.00Up is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201789.8491.90NC89.84NCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201889.9491.23NC89.94NCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201988.6188.09NC88.61NCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202084.4788.45NC84.47NCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202184.9087.0184.90NCNCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202284.3884.00NC84.38NCUp is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202382.1884.7382.18Up is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202479.6881.4479.68Up is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202580.4481.0080.44Up is Good TAP01a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202681.67Up is Good TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/20134.00Up is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201410.00Up is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20176.185.60NC6.18NCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20186.296.80NC6.29NCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20198.027.80NC8.02NCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202010.128.81NC10.12NCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/20217.675.227.67NCNCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20229.7410.00NC9.74NCUp is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202310.6410.2410.64Up is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202413.1014.4313.10Up is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202512.2213.1812.22Up is Bad TAP01b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with their local area as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202611.67Up is Bad TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201363.00Up is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201454.00Up is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201765.5465.60NC65.54NCUp is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201862.1364.76NC62.13NCUp is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201957.3360.29NC57.33NCUp is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202051.0055.56NC51.00NCUp is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202150.5052.4350.50NCNCUp is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202250.5853.00NC50.58NCUp is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202347.3048.1847.30Up is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202443.8441.1343.84Up is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202548.4641.4748.46Up is Good TAP02a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202647.67Up is Good TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201319.00Up is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201429.00Up is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201720.3220.80NC20.32NCUp is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201822.8020.26NC22.80NCUp is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201922.1023.05NC22.10NCUp is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202019.6521.62NC19.65NCUp is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202122.5219.7122.52NCNCUp is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202227.8024.00NC27.80NCUp is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202330.8528.7930.85Up is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202426.5834.4126.58Up is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202529.4928.0829.49Up is Bad TAP02b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with the way the council runs thingsQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202632.12Up is Bad TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201345.00Up is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201442.00Up is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201745.3347.20NC45.33NCUp is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201845.4548.57NC45.45NCUp is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201943.1442.68NC43.14NCUp is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202038.0743.00NC38.07NCUp is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202134.4138.5234.41NCNCUp is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202236.7339.00NC36.73NCUp is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202333.2537.5033.25Up is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202430.9833.2530.98Up is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202533.9232.3033.92Up is Good TAP03a% of Talkabout panel agree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202635.31Up is Good TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201325.00Up is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201431.00Up is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201724.0622.20NC24.06NCUp is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201823.8921.10NC23.89NCUp is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201917.2123.51NC17.21NCUp is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202019.7619.00NC19.76NCUp is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202127.9725.6427.97NCNCUp is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202223.2722.00NC23.27NCUp is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202325.8324.0525.83Up is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202425.0028.0125.00Up is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202526.5827.9126.58Up is Bad TAP03b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council provides value for moneyQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202625.52Up is Bad TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201392.00Up is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201489.00Up is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201792.2091.90NC92.20NCUp is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201891.7092.65NC91.70NCUp is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201989.6391.51NC89.63NCUp is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202087.5387.07NC87.53NCUp is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202185.9387.5885.93NCNCUp is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202284.9488.00NC84.94NCUp is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202383.4283.4683.42Up is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202480.3883.2480.38Up is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202579.9584.7879.95Up is Good TAP04a% of Talkabout panel satisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202679.41Up is Good TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/20134.00Up is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20146.00Up is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20174.403.10NC4.40NCUp is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20185.534.01NC5.53NCUp is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20196.704.46NC6.70NCUp is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20205.878.28NC5.87NCUp is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/20216.424.876.42NCNCUp is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20229.077.00NC9.07NCUp is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202310.559.8110.55Up is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202410.0810.6410.08Up is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202513.119.1913.11Up is Bad TAP04b% of Talkabout panel dissatisfied with York as a place to liveQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202611.03Up is Bad TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201440.00Up is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201760.8161.70NC60.81NCUp is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201850.3362.81NC50.33NCUp is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201951.3150.64NC51.31NCUp is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202051.5053.29NC51.50NCUp is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202248.4452.00NC48.44NCUp is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202342.4050.2942.40Up is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202447.1145.3347.11Up is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202541.6246.2141.62Up is Good TAP05a% of Talkabout panel agree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202640.77Up is Good TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201411.00Up is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20177.477.00NC7.47NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201810.687.35NC10.68NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20197.2110.04NC7.21NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20208.258.03NC8.25NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202210.5110.00NC10.51NCUp is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202311.4711.9511.47Up is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20249.6414.139.64Up is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202511.179.4011.17Up is Bad TAP05b% of Talkabout panel disagree the council treated them fairly and with respect in the last 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202611.02Up is Bad TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201370.00Up is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201474.00Up is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201789.2088.80NC89.20NCUp is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201886.0589.53NC86.05NCUp is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201991.9288.61NC91.92NCUp is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202087.9488.73NC87.94NCUp is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202288.8290.00NC88.82NCUp is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202387.8391.7187.83Up is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202489.8988.3989.89Up is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202589.0389.4789.03Up is Good TAP06a% of Talkabout panel who agree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202688.95Up is Good TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201330.00Up is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201426.00Up is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201710.4010.80NC10.40NCUp is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201813.099.58NC13.09NCUp is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20197.219.92NC7.21NCUp is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202011.5610.45NC11.56NCUp is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20229.809.00NC9.80NCUp is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202310.857.3210.85Up is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20248.9911.618.99Up is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/20259.699.749.69Up is Bad TAP06b% of Talkabout panel who disagree it is important to feel part of their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/20268.16Up is Bad TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201355.00Up is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201454.00Up is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201774.7075.20NC74.70NCUp is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201875.2778.44NC75.27NCUp is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201980.2276.41NC80.22NCUp is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202077.7878.06NC77.78NCUp is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202169.3870.2169.38NCNCUp is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202278.0976.00NC78.09NCUp is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202377.9078.4377.90Up is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202477.2672.8977.26Up is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202573.4775.2073.47Up is Good TAP07a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202674.93Up is Good TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201345.00Up is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201446.00Up is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201725.1024.40NC25.10NCUp is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201823.0319.11NC23.03NCUp is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201919.3321.71NC19.33NCUp is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202021.7120.46NC21.71NCUp is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202129.8828.3329.88NCNCUp is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202220.4923.00NC20.49NCUp is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202320.2221.3720.22Up is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202421.5726.8421.57Up is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202525.2624.2725.26Up is Bad TAP07b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they belong to their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202617.33Up is Bad TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201373.00Up is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201458.00Up is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201770.1169.50NC70.11NCUp is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201872.8475.24NC72.84NCUp is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201968.4775.06NC68.47NCUp is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202061.8862.17NC61.88NCUp is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202155.8055.3055.80NCNCUp is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202265.5665.00NC65.56NCUp is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202366.6761.7666.67Up is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202469.2365.0069.23Up is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202566.0867.1166.08Up is Good TAP08a% of Talkabout panel agree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202661.68Up is Good TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/20138.00Up is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201415.00Up is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20179.449.40NC9.44NCUp is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201811.856.55NC11.85NCUp is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20196.918.86NC6.91NCUp is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20208.919.20NC8.91NCUp is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202111.859.6211.85NCNCUp is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20228.228.00NC8.22NCUp is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20236.9810.136.98Up is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20247.427.117.42Up is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/20255.828.755.82Up is Bad TAP08b% of Talkabout panel disagree their local area is a place where people from different backgrounds get on well togetherQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/20268.40Up is Bad TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201329.00Up is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201424.00Up is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201725.6529.00NC25.65NCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201826.8728.41NC26.87NCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201928.9525.68NC28.95NCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202029.0627.37NC29.06NCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202127.3029.5527.30NCNCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202224.2627.00NC24.26NCUp is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202320.9425.6720.94Up is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202421.3722.7921.37Up is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202520.9222.1120.92Up is Good TAP11a% of Talkabout panel who agree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202619.41Up is Good TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201342.00Up is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201449.00Up is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201739.9639.50NC39.96NCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201840.9437.22NC40.94NCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201941.0143.16NC41.01NCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202037.9339.30NC37.93NCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202140.9439.8040.94NCNCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202247.1443.00NC47.14NCUp is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202348.6947.1348.69Up is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202450.9651.7450.96Up is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202550.0050.0050.00Up is Bad TAP11b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that they can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202643.62Up is Bad TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201375.00Up is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201486.00Up is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201790.8588.20NC90.85NCUp is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201889.9190.27NC89.91NCUp is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201992.2489.66NC92.24NCUp is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202090.5991.58NC90.59NCUp is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202290.3491.00NC90.34NCUp is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202392.3993.6092.39Up is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202491.4692.9991.46Up is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202590.8492.3590.84Up is Good TAP12a% of Talkabout panel who state it is important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202690.93Up is Good TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201325.00Up is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201414.00Up is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20177.3610.50NC7.36NCUp is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20188.377.74NC8.37NCUp is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20196.218.02NC6.21NCUp is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20208.176.74NC8.17NCUp is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20227.897.00NC7.89NCUp is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20236.304.466.30Up is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20246.345.126.34Up is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/20255.094.755.09Up is Bad TAP12b% of Talkabout panel who state it is not important that residents can influence decisions in their local areaQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/20264.80Up is Bad TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201374.00Up is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201480.00Up is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201777.0377.00NC77.03NCUp is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201870.5174.72NC70.51NCUp is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201977.1973.21NC77.19NCUp is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202079.7573.35NC79.75NCUp is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202274.3679.00NC74.36NCUp is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202372.9275.8872.92Up is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202476.7376.1376.73Up is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202573.2176.5373.21Up is Good TAP20a% of Talkabout panel who agree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202669.73Up is Good TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201311.00Up is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201410.00Up is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201712.8011.50NC12.80NCUp is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201817.5214.41NC17.52NCUp is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201910.3114.14NC10.31NCUp is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202010.0012.60NC10.00NCUp is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202211.449.00NC11.44NCUp is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202311.2012.4511.20Up is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202410.539.0210.53Up is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202511.229.0711.22Up is Bad TAP20b% of Talkabout panel who disagree that York is a safe city to live in, relatively free from crime and violenceQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202616.87Up is Bad TF2-A01Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201552.0052.00Up is Good TF2-A01Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016500.00299.00349.00377.00500.00Up is Good TF2-A01Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/2017742.00547.00581.00617.00742.00Up is Good TF2-A01Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018891.00761.00786.00815.00891.00Up is Good TF2-A01Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20191078.00934.00965.001025.001078.00Up is Good TF2-A01Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20201328.001155.001242.001287.001328.00Up is Good TF2-A01Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/20211440.001360.001386.001406.001440.00Up is Good TF2-A01Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20221574.001481.001513.001542.001574.00Up is Good TF2-A01Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20231648.001635.001648.001648.001648.00Up is Good TF2-A01Number of Troubled Families (Families identified with 2 or more headline criteria) - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20241648.00Up is Good TF2-A02% of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20150.000.00Up is Good TF2-A02% of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20160.000.000.000.000.00Up is Good TF2-A02% of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20176.000.001.003.006.00Up is Good TF2-A02% of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201810.006.006.006.0010.00Up is Good TF2-A02% of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201920.0010.0014.0015.0020.00Up is Good TF2-A02% of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202031.0024.0026.0028.0031.00Up is Good TF2-A02% of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202147.0036.0040.0044.0047.00Up is Good TF2-A02% of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202250.0043.0045.0047.0050.00Up is Good TF2-A02% of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202359.0050.0054.0057.0059.00Up is Good TF2-A02% of Troubled Families who have achieved an outcome - (Snapshot)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202461.00Up is Good