APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20140Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCNeutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20160.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20190.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20200.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20210.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20220.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCNeutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024N/CNeutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NCNeutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018NCNCNeutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201927.2420.326.431.7327.0929.7625.4128.7428.0225.2328.236.7830.2928.9120.6119.5423.62Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202025.8622.9122.6220.2822.0420.1522.526.8823.1124.7933.5330.1929.9831.6122.1932.3429.08Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/202131.5933.6234.2535.7234.6629.9230.6935.1332.132.0235.937.0434.9230.523.8223.5526.12Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202223.3820.1527.0516.2620.9815.923.2120.6219.7326.4825.9530.4827.4628.6724.5224.525.64Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/202317.4426.2816.6813.7518.7615.7517.9712.3315.4610.5417.0417.6314.8219.1522.4418.8620.02Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/202417.9816.0717.1320.6818.1818.7718.7315.9917.7522.0615.8221.5419.519.7115.0814.316.49Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/202513.2613.098.3313.1411.4911.3512.314.2312.5114.9116.189.5513.4616.8312.420.6216.14Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/202619.32NANANANANANANANeutral ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018NCUp is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20195.724.94.84.14.15.175.124.944.9454.864.524.524.985.315.725.72Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20204.875.15.065.25.25.165.144.844.844.674.43.853.853.823.944.874.87Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/20215.365.315.965.695.695.876.457.147.147.77.457.937.937.125.975.365.36Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/20228.265.675.486.076.075.396.135.755.756.86.576.966.967.877.848.268.26Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/202311.997.817.747.457.457.38.28.678.679.329.8510.5310.5311.4411.1111.9911.99Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/202411.2311.5311.612.2212.2212.0411.1210.6410.6411.0811.3311.6811.6811.3911.5611.2311.23Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/202510.0511.2610.9810.8510.8510.7510.6510.0810.0810.439.99.659.6510.039.3810.0510.05Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/20269.979.169.519.519.389.519.059.05Up is Good ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202021232149213421352135216621962209220921872170216921692169214321232123Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/202121582154216122092209219922262258225822502253222222222154214721582158Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202220372153217621792179216421322123212321112106208420842068206320372037Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/202320902034205720712071207620962114211420902092206820682064207320902090Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/202420652070209020822082209720892088208820912087207820782052206320652065Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/202521162052207620892089204920702081208120952102209920992077210421162116Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/202621002101209720972113212721172117Neutral ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201875Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201979Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202076Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202180Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202279Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202378Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202481Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201868Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201973Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202072Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202173Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202271Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202377Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202476Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2011/201273.1Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2012/201363.2Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2013/201482.6Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2014/201591.8Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2015/201682.681.881.88281.981.981.781.781.881.681.581.381.581.681.684.282.47Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2016/201782.2684.184.384.584.384.6884.298484.3284.1681.4481.7282.4479.3379.7680.6579.91Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2017/20188280.1879.779.779.8679.5979.4179.0179.3378.9678.4177.5378.2977.3177.2977.0777.22Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2018/201981.477.1277.1276.2376.8276.3176.3876.3876.3676.1376.2876.0576.1574.9374.9374.9374.93Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2019/202081.8Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2020/202184.1NAUp is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2021/202284.8Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2022/202384.4Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2023/202485.8Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201253.9Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201363.9Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201468.7Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201555.1Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201628.5Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201739.2120.2220.5321.2620.6937.5538.0538.9738.1944.6746.4946.2245.8350.4652.6453.2452.14Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20186948475249586770577981816582828369Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20198483838483868685858584838483838284Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20208084828283818180828080808179787780Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/20217378777677757372757371717471716873Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/20224653535152484745474544444442414141Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/20233440393638373535373535343632312535Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/20243024302830242427232222252120Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2013/201443Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2014/201546.6Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2015/201645.8Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2016/201749.5Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2017/201844.5Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2018/201943.4Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2019/202045.5Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2020/202135.4Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2021/202239.7Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2022/202341.3Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2023/202450.2Up is Good ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20127Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20137.7Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201411.5Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20159.9Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201611.32.282.283.053.053.816.097.617.618.379.910.6610.6613.714.4616.7516.75Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201711.180.750.752.252.25333.763.765.266.018.268.269.0111.2711.2711.27Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201815.71.493.734.474.475.966.717.457.458.9511.9313.4213.4214.1615.6516.416.4Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201910.43.735.226.716.717.457.458.958.9511.1812.6714.1614.1615.6515.6515.6515.65Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202019.22.984.477.457.458.9511.1812.6712.6713.4214.9114.9114.9116.419.3819.3819.38Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202113.32.243.735.225.225.227.459.699.6911.9311.9313.4213.4214.1614.9114.9114.91Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202222.1Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202316.4Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20248.3Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201611.422.2800.763.050.762.281.524.570.761.520.763.053.050.762.286.09Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201711.270.7501.52.250.7500.751.51.50.752.254.50.752.2503Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201815.71.492.240.754.481.490.750.752.981.492.981.495.960.751.490.752.99Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201910.43.731.491.496.710.7501.492.242.241.491.495.221.49001.49Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020NC2.981.492.987.451.492.241.495.220.751.4902.241.492.9804.47Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NC2.241.491.495.2202.242.244.472.2401.493.730.750.7501.49Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/20221.491.494.477.452.241.491.495.22Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012608.4Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013617.7Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014767.5Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015630.8Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016683.176.8126.17202.97202.97255.08312.68394.96394.96430.62474.51543.08543.08606.16658.27713.13713.13Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017647.891.8148.5189189251.1299.7372.6372.6407.7456.3515.7515.7569.7629.1669.6669.6Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018649.445.3295.97162.62162.62215.94287.92349.23349.23394.55447.87546.51546.51586.49634.48655.81655.81Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019668.693.31186.61239.93239.93303.91354.56399.88399.88466.53517.18567.83567.83623.82645.14671.8671.8Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020539.658.65130.63181.28181.28261.26317.24346.57346.57378.56418.54453.2453.2495.85530.51546.51546.51Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021347.329.3242.6571.9871.98106.64146.62191.94191.94221.27261.26333.24333.24378.56415.88458.53458.53Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022499Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023479.5Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024524.2Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016693.9376.849.3776.8202.9752.1157.682.28191.9935.6643.8868.57148.1163.0852.1154.86170.05Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017656.191.856.740.518962.148.672.9183.635.148.659.4143.15459.440.5153.9Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018649.445.3250.6566.65162.6253.3271.9861.32186.6245.3253.3298.64197.2839.9947.9921.33109.31Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019668.693.3193.3153.32239.9363.9850.6545.32159.9566.6550.6550.65167.9555.9821.3326.66103.97Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020NC58.6571.9850.65181.2879.9855.9829.32165.2831.9939.9934.66106.6431.9934.661682.64Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NC29.3213.3329.3271.9834.6639.9945.32119.9629.3239.9971.98141.2945.3237.3242.65125.3Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202242.6550.6547.99141.2950.6539.9916106.64Up is Bad ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012100Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2012/201369.8Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2013/201480.9Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2014/201581.5Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2015/201675.7Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2016/201779.25Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2017/201892.5Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2018/201983Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2019/202080.6Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2020/202184.8Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2021/202288.2Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2022/202383.6Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2023/202491.2Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2011/20120.4Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2012/20130.7Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2013/20141.1Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2014/20150.9Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2015/20162.2Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.78Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.8Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2018/20190.7Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2019/20200.5Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2020/20210.5Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2021/20220.5Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2022/20231.1Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2023/20241.9Up is Good ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201217.3Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201318.2Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201417.6Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201511.69.1511.9813.0113.0112.3512.5613.0113.0113.1613.5713.1513.1512.8712.1411.8911.89Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201613.26.559.5310.7310.7310.8811.3211.8211.8211.4112.0712.3212.3213.2913.3113.3613.36Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201716.8518.2216.1617.6317.6317.6317.8718.0218.0218.1318.5918.0218.0217.2216.7216.8516.85Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201813.514.513.412.112.111.411.411.911.912.112.413.113.113.313.413.513.5Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201917.319.818.819.219.217.417.617.717.71817.817.717.717.617.617.517.5Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202015.421.821.120.320.318.717.517.317.316.71615.615.615.715.6Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201613.366.5512.5113.1110.7211.3213.1114.312.918.9416.6814.313.3122.0511.3216.0916.49Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201716.8518.2214.120.5717.6317.6318.8118.8118.4118.8121.7413.5218.029.9911.7518.2213.32Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201813.514.512.39.612.19.111.414.611.713.214.518.715.514.915.113.914.6Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201917.319.817.82019.211.818.318.616.219.416.617.217.716.716.91716.7Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202021.820.518.520.314.212.71614.313.510.912.712.416.115.2Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/20123.2Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201310.7Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201411.1Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/20156.34.273.965.085.085.795.986.26.26.627.097.257.257.086.66.356.35Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20166.92.383.874.774.775.365.365.865.865.966.186.166.166.976.836.956.95Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20177.499.48.239.999.999.999.649.319.318.99.048.758.758.117.647.497.49Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20186.45.85.14.64.64.64.55.25.25.666.56.56.56.56.46.4Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20196.67.37.67.97.96.97.27.47.47.57.57.27.276.86.66.6Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20204.95.35.45.95.95.85.65.65.65.55.15555Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20166.952.385.366.554.767.155.368.346.956.557.755.966.7514.35.368.349.33Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20177.499.47.0513.529.999.998.237.648.626.469.996.467.632.352.945.883.72Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20186.45.84.43.74.64.64.38.45.87.98.810.396.86.44.86Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20196.67.388.47.94.18.28.678.17.456.84.65.64.24.8Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20205.35.47.15.95.54.95.75.44.52.643.75.34.8Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2011/201264Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2012/201365.8Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2013/201467.4Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2014/201567.1Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2015/201664Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2016/201762.4Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2017/201862.9Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2018/201963.8Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2019/202068.1Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2020/202172.3Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2021/202265.1Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2022/202366.5Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2023/202465.1Up is Good BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2010/20110Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2011/201227Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2012/201336Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2013/201415Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2014/20153Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2015/20160000Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017298Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018546Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019713Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020832Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021685Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022367Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023119Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024140Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025144144Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201144Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201237.04Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201334.42Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201429.51Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.07Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201628.02Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201728.7Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201827.61Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201927.6Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202027.6Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202121.5NANANAUp is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202225.1NAUp is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202324.1Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202423.4Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202518.2Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201149.98Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201243.61Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201340.61Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201434.36Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201535.08Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201630.81Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201732.6Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201829.94Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201929.7Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202029.9Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202121.9NANANAUp is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202225.5NAUp is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202324.4Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202421.8Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202520.4Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201152.07Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201246.36Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201343.28Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201437.79Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201538.18Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201635.02Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201736Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201833.14Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201933.7Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202033.3Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202125.8NANANAUp is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202228.7NAUp is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202327.9Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202425.8Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202522.3Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201147.51Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201237.34Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201335.37Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201431.05Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.71Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201628.91Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201729.9Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201827.33Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201927.3Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202027.3Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202120.7NANANAUp is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202222.8NAUp is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202321.7Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202420.1Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202519.5Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201144.57Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201242.84Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201339.6Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201435.67Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201534.34Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201631.44Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201732.4Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201829.87Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201929.6Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202029.8Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202122.5NANANAUp is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202225NAUp is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202323.8Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202422.2Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202520Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201142.88Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201236.18Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201333.19Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201428.03Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201530.09Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201628.49Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201727.4Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201826.93Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201925.4Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202025.9Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202119NANANAUp is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202219.2NAUp is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202319.2Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202419.5Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202518Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201151.33Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201249.48Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201342.98Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201438.38Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201540.47Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201635.16Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201735.8Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201833.26Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201934.2Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202033.8Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202128.5NANANAUp is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202232.7NAUp is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202333Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202429.8Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202523.2Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201174.86Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201262.32Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201352.43Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201445.49Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201549.67Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201643.87Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201745.2Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201842.79Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201946.1Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202046.5Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202136.7NANANAUp is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202239.1NAUp is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202340.6Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202434.4Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202525.5Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201146.63Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201241.6Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201339.91Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201436.08Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201537.6Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201631.85Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201734.7Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201831.72Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201931.8Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202031.4Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202124.4NANANAUp is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202229.2NAUp is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202328.45Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202427Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202520.9Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201166.14Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201257.71Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201350.96Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201440.83Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201542Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201637.51Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201736.9Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201836.35Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201935.6Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202037.4Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202127.2NANANAUp is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202232.8NAUp is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202330.62Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202425.7Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202524.8Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201173.37Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201262.49Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201354.23Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201451.59Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201549.18Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201646.92Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201747.7Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201845.86Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201946.3Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202045.5Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202135NANANAUp is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202243.5NAUp is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202341.33Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202437.1Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202532.4Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201156.68Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201248.06Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201345.51Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201439.97Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201545.22Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201637.68Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201737.5Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201836.24Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201936.1Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202037.8Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202129.2NANANAUp is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202232.9NAUp is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202330.39Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202428.8Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202525.4Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201155.63Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201262.64Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201356.46Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201447.45Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201546.97Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201644.59Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201742.7Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201842.78Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201941.8Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202038.9Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202132.5NANANAUp is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202233.7NAUp is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202333.77Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202430.9Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202528.1Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201155.76Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201246.34Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201343.16Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201436.29Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201539.46Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201636.83Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201735.5Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201835.25Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201932.7Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202033.1Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202124.6NANANAUp is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202225.4NAUp is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202325.97Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202425Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202523.9Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201161.36Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201262.01Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201361.67Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201450.71Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201552.17Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201647.13Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201747.5Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201843.93Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201946.6Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202044.3Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202140.2NANANAUp is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202247.5NAUp is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202347.26Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202442.6Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202531.1Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201181.38Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201268.85Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201361.75Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201450.85Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201554.75Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201647.98Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201749.9Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201845.77Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201945.5Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202046.7Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202138.8NANANAUp is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202240.5NAUp is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202343.73Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202436.6Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202528.5Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2005/20066.96.9Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20076.96.9Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20086.36.3Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20096.16.1Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20105.65.6Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20115.85.8Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20125.25.2Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20135.45.4Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20145.25.2Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20154.74.7Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20164.54.5Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20174.34.3Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201844Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20193.93.9Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20203.83.8Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20213.4Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20223.9Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20233.5Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20243.2Up is Bad CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (31,587) (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2009100Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (31,587) (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2010116Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (31,587) (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2011126Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (31,587) (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2012138Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (31,587) (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2013151Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (31,587) (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2014156Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (31,587) (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2015145Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (31,587) (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2016149Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (31,587) (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2017141Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (31,587) (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2018147Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (31,587) (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2019141Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (31,587) (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2020117Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (31,587) (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2021107Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (31,587) (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2022115Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (31,587) (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2023114Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (31,587) (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2024102Up is Good CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2003/20043.7Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2004/20053.5Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2005/20064.9Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2006/20075.6Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2007/20086Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2008/20094.7Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2009/20105Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2010/20115Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2011/20125Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2012/20133.8Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2013/20143.5Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2014/20152.9Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2015/20162.8Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2016/20172.5Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2017/20183.4Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2018/20194.6Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2019/20203.9Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2020/20213.5Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2021/20222.8Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2022/20233.1Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2023/20243.2Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NCUp is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/201312.9Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/201410.8Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/201510.4Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/20169.5Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.7Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/201812.8Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/201913.9Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020NCUp is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2007/200824.1Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2008/200924.1Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2009/201024.1Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2010/201124.1Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2011/201224.7Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2012/201324.7Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2013/201424.7Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2014/201516.4Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2015/201616.4Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2016/201715.9Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2017/201815.9Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2018/201918.9Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2019/202018.9Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2020/202118.9Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20110.9Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20121Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20131.3Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20141.3Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20150.7Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20160.9Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.8Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.9Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20190.6Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20200.9Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20210.9Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20231Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2010/201153.1Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/201261Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/201363.2Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/201463.4Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/201572.2Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/201693.1Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017100.9Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/201888.5Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/201983.6Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/202072Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/202167.5Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/202242.3Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/202333Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/202426.5Up is Bad CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201173.66Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201273.36Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201373.99Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201469Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NANeutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201777.1Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018NCNeutral CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022603.6Up is Bad CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023601.7Up is Bad CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024603.5Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2010/2011108.8Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012103.3Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013109.4Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014111.2Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015121.9Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016140.8Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017136.4Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018136.8Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019126.7Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/202094.7Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/202184Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/202291.6Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/202381.8Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/202467.6Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014142.7Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015129.7Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016103.7Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017143.3Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018157.3Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019132.4Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020119.4Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/202139.9Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/202280.2Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023107Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024120.4Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2010/201142.4Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/201255.6Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013111.6Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/201497.3Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015111Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016180.7Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017111.6Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/201898.5Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019127.4Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/202099.1Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021114.1Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022173Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023144.8Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024115.6Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012338.81Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013435Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014407.79Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015562.5Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016692.03Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017658.1Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018565.64Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019508.04Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020365.08Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021457.38Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022390.86Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023254.51Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024178.3Up is Bad CHP34aAbsolute gap in % of children totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks between highest and lowest York ward (4 year aggregated ward data)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202136.5Up is Bad CHP34aAbsolute gap in % of children totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks between highest and lowest York ward (4 year aggregated ward data)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202236.7Up is Bad CHP34aAbsolute gap in % of children totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks between highest and lowest York ward (4 year aggregated ward data)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202338.98Up is Bad CHP34aAbsolute gap in % of children totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks between highest and lowest York ward (4 year aggregated ward data)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202439.3Up is Bad CHP34aAbsolute gap in % of children totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks between highest and lowest York ward (4 year aggregated ward data)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202536.43Up is Bad CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/2014153.23132.92140.04153.23Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015307.08158.83153.54248.84307.08Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016468.52314.67458.03492.99468.52Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/2017538548453458538Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018454373372418454Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/2019482412455435482Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/2020504443504Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201455.8859.8457.3255.88Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201561.460.9858.0660.9861.4Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201663.6460.6761.0658.5463.64Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201767.853.259.362.167.8Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201865.168.267.666.165.1Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201970.474.671.76370.1Up is Good CMHD05People entering IAPT (in month) as % of those estimated to have anxiety/depression (VoY CCG) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20177.513.28.47.57.5Neutral CMHD05People entering IAPT (in month) as % of those estimated to have anxiety/depression (VoY CCG) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201815.57.78.611.311.39.811.110.410.410.612.510.610.616.114.615.515.5Neutral CMHD05People entering IAPT (in month) as % of those estimated to have anxiety/depression (VoY CCG) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201914.414.611.514.814.81515.413.413.415.71.216.716.716.313.214.414.4Neutral CMHD05People entering IAPT (in month) as % of those estimated to have anxiety/depression (VoY CCG) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20201813.418Neutral CMHP15ANumber of bed days in secondary mental health care hospitals, per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20144786.444976.024975.665069.744786.44Up is Bad CMHP15ANumber of bed days in secondary mental health care hospitals, per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20158285.595022.715282.146566.948285.89Up is Bad CMHP15ANumber of bed days in secondary mental health care hospitals, per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20164989.346522.55971.825997.174989.34Up is Bad CMHP15ANumber of bed days in secondary mental health care hospitals, per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20174252.324413.084285.164324.924252.32Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2006/20072.6Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2007/20082.3Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2008/20092.2Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2009/20102.2Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2010/20112.2Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/20121.6Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/20132.2Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20142.3Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015321.4Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20161.7Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20172.6Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20182.4Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20193.5Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20202.7Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/20211.5Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20221.8Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20232.7Up is Bad CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2010/201195.8Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/201295.25Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201396.25Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201495.78Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201595.1595.794.3NC96.3Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20169695.893.694.695.1Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201796.376.495.696.495.5Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201895.61Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201995.86Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202095.17Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202195.59Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202293.54Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202394.5Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202496Up is Good CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015521820104Up is Bad CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016226781Up is Bad CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201843116818Up is Bad CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/2020NAUp is Bad CSB16aHospital admissions for dental caries (0-4 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015368.7Up is Bad CSB16aHospital admissions for dental caries (0-4 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016342.9Up is Bad CSB16aHospital admissions for dental caries (0-4 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017353.55Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018480.2Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019534.3Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020507Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021418.1Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022277.4Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023126.6Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/202464.8Up is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015263797Up is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20163371484Up is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201713Up is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018NC2Up is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/2020NAUp is Bad CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20153891301076983Neutral CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201625578547350Neutral CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201713025412044Neutral CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201819246664040Neutral CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201922946634575Neutral CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202012698Neutral CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2009/20101632Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2010/20111726Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2011/20121953Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2012/20131593149130122401122112132366151140143434117135140392Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2013/20141530121114119354125168132425161123133417107114113334Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2014/20151808113133158404177216135528158155197510128113125366Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2015/201615181281181333791631531354511381071273728591140316Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017139999137148384154124108386122981313519075113278Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018111510780892761001271293561008676262736484221Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2018/20199998176842417610593274907592257777674227Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2019/20209037889712386893672289187100278475557159Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2020/202155737233191726256190533110218647182590Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022656575369179676144172604776183393944122Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2022/20234233644381183333309619323889324741120Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2023/2024625454144130636569197394551135384778163Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2024/2025729594973181728168221584669173604351154Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2025/20265751431517987Up is Bad CSP29bNumber of Incidents of Alcohol Related ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017594336648147695352174493663148423449125Up is Bad CSP29bNumber of Incidents of Alcohol Related ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018NC5435421313750431303633NCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad CSP29bNumber of Incidents of Alcohol Related ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANAUp is Bad EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2012/20131062Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2013/20141728Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2014/20151683Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2015/20161457Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2016/20171864Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2017/20181986Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2018/20191691Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2019/20201737Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2020/20211225Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2021/20221250Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2022/20231378Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2023/20241266Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2024/20251191Up is Good EH1AChlamydia diagnoses (15-19 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201419221344153218141922Up is Good EH1AChlamydia diagnoses (15-19 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201514161756164015321416Up is Good EH1AChlamydia diagnoses (15-19 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201613661438Up is Good EH1BChlamydia diagnoses (20-24 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201417341200150816741734Up is Good EH1BChlamydia diagnoses (20-24 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201514951793162315041495Up is Good EH1BChlamydia diagnoses (20-24 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201614531518Up is Good EH1BChlamydia diagnoses (20-24 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018457Up is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2021/202226.5Up is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2022/202321Up is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2023/202417.1Up is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2024/202515.8Up is Good HLTH01aPupils achieving a Good Level of Development at age 5 (%)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201464.8Up is Good HLTH01aPupils achieving a Good Level of Development at age 5 (%)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201774.3Up is Good HLTH02aLimiting long term illness or disability (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201515.3Up is Bad HLTH03aProvision of 1 hour or more unpaid care per week (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20159.2Up is Bad HLTH04aPensioners living alone (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.3Up is Bad HLTH05aObese adults (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201523Up is Bad HLTH06aBinge drinking adults (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201529.7Up is Bad HLTH07aHealthy eating adults (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201528.3Up is Good HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015104.3Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201697.1Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018141.3Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020153.8Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021141.1Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Due April 25Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due April 2026Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20157.6Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20167.3Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201810.1Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202010.2Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202111.7Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Due April 25Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due April 2026Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20158.3Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20166.6Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20187.9Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20208.2Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202111.1Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Due April 25Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due April 2026Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York ward ( 5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201597.1Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York ward ( 5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016110.2Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York ward ( 5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York ward ( 5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018126.2Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York ward ( 5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York ward ( 5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020133.2Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York ward ( 5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021119.6Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York ward ( 5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York ward ( 5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York ward ( 5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Due April 25Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York ward ( 5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due April 2026Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201555.6Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201659.2Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201870.7Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202188.8Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Due April 25Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York ward (5 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due April 2026Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/202069380Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/202152740Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/202263245Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/202030775Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/202122880Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/202227890Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/202038605Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/202129855Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/202235350Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/20207240Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/20214930Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/20226395Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/202032215Neutral HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/202125585Neutral HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/202229625Neutral HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Neutral HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Neutral HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Neutral HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/202029925Up is Bad HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/202122225Up is Bad HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/202227230Up is Bad HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Up is Bad HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201674.423.3562.645974.4Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201778.374.3270.1473.778.3Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201885.6184.285.484.785.61Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201985.98788.288.785.9Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202087.7886.3387.3986.6287.78Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202177.6255.0959.7173.6777.62Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202266.7579.6883.5483.6966.75Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202386.2672.3284.7386.5786.26Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202474.285.2487.9182.9474.2Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202562.2470.9668.0166.6762.24Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202684.62Up is Good HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201621.767.9830.573521.7Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201712.7721.2119.6417.712.77Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20189.9112.310.111.99.91Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201911.711.710.59.611.7Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202010.2312.2311.0411.7410.23Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202121.8237.9739.0726.121.82Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202232.2118.7215.515.1132.21Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202312.8727.6813.7912.4412.87Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202425.2213.9312.0915.4925.22Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202535.9927.1231.1832.2835.99Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202613.39Up is Bad HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201670.861.5463.166570.8Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201777.0975.2278.9677.877.09Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201882.4682.783.183.282.46Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201989.285.386.488.489.2Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202087.5988.5588.8988.5687.59Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202188.6982.2684.1987.5288.69Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202285.4487.9487.248785.44Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20238686.4786.8484.8386Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202482.568788.7486.7482.56Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202586.2286.1980.586.0886.22Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202686.29Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201630.130.5925.822130.1Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201744.2334.0336.8735.744.23Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201843.1544.544.342.343.15Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201949.3844.645.748.6749.38Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202048.3946.9245.6350.8948.39Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202149.145.0145.7350.349.1Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202248.5247.853.1448.4348.52Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202350.8650.3852.6549.7950.86Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202451.1650.595053.9351.16Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202554.6351.6748.3951.6554.63Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202647.97Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201616.7718.1620.811820.4Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201741.6523.9821.662541.65Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201872.2165.7736972.21Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201981.878.479.883.881.8Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202086.1483.1583.8686.2986.14Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202168.5681.8985.7580.7868.56Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202288.3864.1885.2293.488.38Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202388.9593.2393.1292.7588.95Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202492.6895.3692.8992.2792.68Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202591.5294.4688.9592.0691.52Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202693.83Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20167022.2232.234770Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201776.9268.9474.8174.576.92Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201881.5279.480.281.981.52Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201984.778.580.582.484.7Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202086.7686.4984.683.4886.76Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202184.187.2383.3386.1484.1Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202293.679.4967.6786.7793.6Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202393.1390.5494.0694.4293.13Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202495.4992.6696.191.8195.49Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202594.2792.3796.3392.694.27Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202694.54Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201611.67.4510.821511.6Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201718.5522.3923.0816.118.55Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201862.644646.362.162.64Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201971.260.870.669.871.2Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202072.6572.6171.3776.2872.65Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202174.1678.2776.2585.2574.16Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202285.0451.1641.7783.1785.04Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202387.1985.3486.6789.887.19Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202491.3488.0888.4690.7191.34Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202587.6588.9289.590.8687.65Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202691.41Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201652.257.953.850.552.2Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201759.455.256.75459.4Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201854.7356.85653.854.73Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201959.456.65758.759.4Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202059.0958.0456.6560.1459.09Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202158.3357.6757.0759.4858.33Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202259.4357.2262.8758.6359.43Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202361.7959.4762.3162.361.79Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202464.5260.6260.4463.6664.52Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202566.6764.263.5562.5766.67Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202659.43Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201990.5589.0588.3390.1190.55Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202093.8886.989.3488.2493.88Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202184.2192.9892.3590.4384.21Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202288.5786.6490.189.4688.57Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202390.2486.6188.2986.1290.24Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202492.3990.2995.5791.8292.39Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202592.4591.8990.9693.4492.45Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202691.19Up is Good HV24aAbsolute gap in % of children who reach expected level of development at 2-2.5 years of age between highest and lowest York ward (4 yr aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NAUp is Bad HV24aAbsolute gap in % of children who reach expected level of development at 2-2.5 years of age between highest and lowest York ward (4 yr aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202213.1Up is Bad HV24aAbsolute gap in % of children who reach expected level of development at 2-2.5 years of age between highest and lowest York ward (4 yr aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202313.65Up is Bad HV24aAbsolute gap in % of children who reach expected level of development at 2-2.5 years of age between highest and lowest York ward (4 yr aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202410.53Up is Bad HV24aAbsolute gap in % of children who reach expected level of development at 2-2.5 years of age between highest and lowest York ward (4 yr aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20259.6Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2009/20109.63Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2010/201110.16Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2011/201211.52Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2012/201311.91Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2013/201411.69Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2014/201510.3Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2009/20104Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2010/20114.55Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2011/20124.97Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2012/20135.54Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2013/20145.65Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2014/20155.4Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201013.08Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201112.79Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201212.88Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201313.28Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201412.79Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201512.88Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201613.28Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201711.59Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201816.1Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201914.3Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202012.2Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20104.8Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20115.52Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20125.76Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.83Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20146.44Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20156.11Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20166.41Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20175.62Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20184.2Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NAUp is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20204.3Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201750.8Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201858.8Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201955.1Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202053.7Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202160.7Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202248.2Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202368.4Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202465.5Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201721.2Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201813.6Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201915.2Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202018.8Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202115Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202221Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202326.7Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202417.7Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201537.1Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201641.7Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201746.4Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201841.9Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201928.1Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202023.5Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202128.4Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202238.1Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202333.5Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202429.9Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017878Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018917Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20191172Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20201039Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021884Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022981Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023993Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20241141Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017445Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018398Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019509Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020518Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021496Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022579Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023491Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024496Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20172411Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20182912Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20193103Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20203057Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20212468Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20222913Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20232976Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20243401Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017978Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018968Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20191084Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20201118Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021942Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20221075Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20231001Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20241063Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017710Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018772Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019688Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020699Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021602Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022675Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023618Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024782Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017390Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018381Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019444Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020414Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021326Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022298Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023261Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024285Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20091412Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20101415Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20111464Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20121425Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20131619Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20141998Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20152020Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20162171Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20172263Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20182372Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20192536Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/2009447Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/2010462Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/2011444Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012462Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013595Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014659Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015636Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016661Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017691Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018724Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019713Up is Bad LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201431.423.632.630.831.4Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201531.634.232.234.331.6Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016403233.936.940Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201738.1936.8139.3237.2738.19Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201833.535.2532.8834.0833.5Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201931.0730.129.6533.0731.07Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202032.1132.3630.631.0332.11Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202127.131.8631.9629.3427.1Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202226.531.0130.428.4726.5Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202326.6322.0123.8427.0726.63Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202425.7529.4826.0524.2825.75Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202521.0321.7123.5127.0721.03Up is Good LDHC08% of adults with a learning disability having a GP Health Check - (VoY CCG)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201433Up is Good LDHC08% of adults with a learning disability having a GP Health Check - (VoY CCG)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201551Up is Good LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018221.28200.51212.05251.27221.28Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019230.24244.64238.93241.73241.77241.86228.08224.1231.35219.82213.75152.59195.39247.14238.95271.32252.47Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020223228216245203Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202139060904Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022239162236118442Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023263.1233.39240.52237341.51Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024334.64374.14323.69283.25357.49Neutral NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20088.19Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20096.69Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20105.43Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20117.45Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20128.59Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20138.08Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20147.82Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20157.11Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20168.59Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20178.52Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189.28Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20199.54Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20207.6Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20228.9Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20237.8Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20248.8Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200816.51Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200917.05Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201014.07Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201114.71Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201216.39Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201316.34Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201415.44Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201515.09Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201615.14Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201716.13Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201817.41Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201915.07Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202022.1Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202218.87Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202318.7Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202419.2Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200822.61Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200917.06Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201014.41Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201117.59Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201222.17Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201321Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201422.43Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201519.14Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201622.37Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201720.83Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201824.07Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201923.65Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202021.4Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202222.7Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202319.9Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202422.8Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20117.22Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201214.55Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.08Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20144.4Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20157.8Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20167.5Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20177.6Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20188.1Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20199.5Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20209.5Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20226.8Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20235.66Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202410.92Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Dec 2025Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201121.38Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201216.36Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201311.17Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201412.8Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201510.6Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201611.6Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201711.6Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201814.8Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201914.1Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202011Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202213.9Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202311.63Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202415.44Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Dec 2025Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201118.35Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201218.79Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201315.22Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201412.6Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201512.9Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201615.5Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201718.6Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201815.9Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201919.8Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202024.2Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202224.4Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202324.68Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202422.84Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Dec 2025Up is Bad NGPP01Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupationsAnnualFinancial Year2012/20138.07Neutral NGPP01Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupationsAnnualFinancial Year2013/201413.66Neutral NGPP01Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupationsAnnualFinancial Year2014/201515.24Neutral NGPP01Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupationsAnnualFinancial Year2015/201613.19Neutral NGPP01Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupationsAnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.09Neutral NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2008/20092666.6Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2009/20102901Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2010/20112778.9Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/20123051.5Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/20132576.3Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/20142671.8Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/20152273.6Up is Bad PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2016/201760.4Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2017/201862.260.460.360.560.560.560.861.161.161.262.4626262.462.462.262.2Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2018/201960.562.363.363.163.163.464.264.464.463.26362.262.261.46160.560.5Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2019/202057.259.758.958.758.758.759.358.858.859.358.357.757.757.757.557.257.2Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2020/202153.255.454.153.453.453.753.853.853.853.953.253.153.152.252.153.253.2Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2021/202255.153.554.254.154.154.755.3555555.355.254.754.753.954.655.155.1Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2022/202356.15555.255.555.555.555.65656575756.256.255.155.256.156.1Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2023/202454.555.655.3555555.155.255.255.254.754.954.354.353.954.154.554.5Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2024/202556.654.254.354.854.854.654.554.755.656.756.856.556.356.6Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2025/202656.357Up is Good PHOF01% of physically active and inactive adults - active adults AnnualFinancial Year2012/201361.54Up is Good PHOF01% of physically active and inactive adults - active adults AnnualFinancial Year2013/201466.16Up is Good PHOF01% of physically active and inactive adults - active adults AnnualFinancial Year2014/201562.18Up is Good PHOF01% of physically active and inactive adults - active adults AnnualFinancial Year2015/201669.83Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201666.71Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201772.03Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201876.4Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201975.16Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202070.92Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202169.29Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202275.2Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202373.6Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202478.6Up is Good PHOF02% of active and inactive adults - inactive adults AnnualFinancial Year2012/201323.67Up is Bad PHOF02% of active and inactive adults - inactive adults AnnualFinancial Year2013/201421.09Up is Bad PHOF02% of active and inactive adults - inactive adults AnnualFinancial Year2014/201521.57Up is Bad PHOF02% of active and inactive adults - inactive adults AnnualFinancial Year2015/201617.54Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201621.1Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201718.3Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201813.8Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201915.8Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202017.6Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202121.2Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202215.4Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202316.3Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202410.8Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012461.73Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013594.09Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014657.5Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015633.84Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016658.5Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017687Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2008/200935.8Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2009/201027.7Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2010/20112727.1Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/201225.321.427.825.217.6Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201322.9628.513.432.219.2Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201421.5921.721.424.117.7Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201515.7110.520.913.322Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201620.4124.518.916.315.2Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201714.816.615.112.5Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201815.6Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201421.421.4Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201516.518.618.515.716.5Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201618.82019.620.418.8Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201716.816.815.814.816.8Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20181314.814.315.613Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201917.213.715.816.117.2Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202015.918.216.816.415.9Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/20219.915.112.812.49.9Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202212.19.910.910.212.1Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/2023Due April 2613.113.613.6Due April 26Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201113.9Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201214.1Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201313.8Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201410.7Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201511.2Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201612.3Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201711.1Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201810.4Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201911.6Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202010.4Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202110.3Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20228Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20238.1Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20246.2Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20254.74.15.944.8Up is Bad PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201465.13Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201566.05Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201665.99Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201766.16Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201864.83Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201965.97Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202066.34Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202165.8Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202266.15Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202364.08Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202462.68Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201463.91Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201565.17Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201665.15Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201765.29Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201864.44Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201964.82Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202065.23Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202164.67Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202265.15Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202363.61Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202462.01Up is Good PHOF11Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201420.933.339.6715.0720.93Up is Good PHOF11Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201538.1122.5326.6831.838.11Up is Good PHOF11Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201670.6748.435763.470.67Up is Good PHOF11Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201772.571.9172.272.272.5Up is Good PHOF11Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201872.772.572.672.772.7Up is Good PHOF11bCumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201441.5446.9145.7543.7741.54Up is Good PHOF11bCumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201539.3541.7541.6441.1239.35Up is Good PHOF11bCumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201637.5739.3238.6337.8137.57Up is Good PHOF11bCumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201737.437.4737.337.437.4Up is Good PHOF11bCumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201837.837.637.637.737.8Up is Good PHOF12Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20148.691.564.426.68.69Up is Good PHOF12Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201514.999.4111.1113.0714.99Up is Good PHOF12Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201626.5519.0422.0223.9726.55Up is Good PHOF12Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201727.126.9526.92727.1Up is Good PHOF12Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201827.527.327.327.427.5Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/200481.82Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/200582.04Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/200682.61Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/200782.98Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/200883.17Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/200982.94Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/201082.9Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/201182.71Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/201282.93Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/201383.04Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201483.37Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201583.37Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201683.4Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201783.4Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201883.42Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201983.27Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202083.55Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202183.49Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202283.62Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202383.37Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202483.61Up is Good PHOF162Smoking prevalence in adults (18-64) - socio-economic gap in current smokers (APS) RatioAnnualFinancial Year2016/20173.43Up is Bad PHOF162Smoking prevalence in adults (18-64) - socio-economic gap in current smokers (APS) RatioAnnualFinancial Year2017/20185.31Up is Bad PHOF162Smoking prevalence in adults (18-64) - socio-economic gap in current smokers (APS) RatioAnnualFinancial Year2018/20191.89Up is Bad PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20151771Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20161806Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20171810Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20181825Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20191902Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20201866Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20212032Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20221900Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20232010Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20241953Neutral PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20146.23Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20155.46Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20164.49Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20174.26Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20185.35Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20196.41Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20206.22Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20215.94Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20226.15Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20236.73Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20246.71Up is Bad PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2001/20022412Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2002/20032402Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2003/20042467Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2004/20052332Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2005/20062189Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20072343Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20082230Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20092259Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20102308Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20112300Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20122412Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20132375Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20142363Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20152323Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20162407Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20172510Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20182496Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20192624Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20202574Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20212683Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20222636Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20232740Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20242710Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20252703Neutral PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2013/201493.04Up is Good PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2014/201591.4Up is Good PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2015/201696.24Up is Good PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NAUp is Good PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018NAUp is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2013/201499.4Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2014/201599.2Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2015/201699.5Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NAUp is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2017/201899.7Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2018/201999.7Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2019/202098.9Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2020/202198.9Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2021/202299.9Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2022/202399.5Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2023/202499.5Up is Good PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201225.4Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201325.7Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201434.4Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.8Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201628.1Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201726.4Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201824.6Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201918.6Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202026.9Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202122.3Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202220.9Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202315.2Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202418.8Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201215.5Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201317Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201418.7Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201517.2Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201614.6Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.6Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201911.5Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202011.9Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202111.7Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20229.2Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20238.7Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20248.1Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20122.42Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20131.84Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20143.05Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20152.91Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20162.74Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20173.43Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20185.31Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20191.89Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20204.85Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20212.47Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20223.75Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20232.19Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20243.3Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201325.7Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201434.4Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.8Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201628.2Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201726.4Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201824.6Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201918.6Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2010/20112272Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2011/20122143Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2012/20132040Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2013/20142098Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2014/20152110Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2015/20162346Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2016/20172279Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2017/20182253Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2018/20192519Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2019/20202487Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2020/20212215Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2021/20222065Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2022/20232009Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2023/20242058Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2011/20125.04Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2012/20135.04Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2013/20145.04Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2014/20155.04Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2015/20165.04Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2016/20175.51Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2017/20185.51Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2018/20195.51Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2019/20205.51Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2021/20225.51Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20106.5Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20117.3Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20123.4Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.2Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20142.9Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20152.2Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20161.9Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20175.1Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20182.6Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20193.6Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20203.4Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20212.4Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20221.7Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20232Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Due May 26Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201199.3Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201299.5Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201395.7Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014100.4Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015111.8Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016104.7Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017121.1Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018133.2Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019121.1Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020101.5Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202182.3Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202287Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202389.5Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202482.8Up is Bad PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201182.72Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201282.91Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201382.44Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201481.42Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201580.63Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201680Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201779.9Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201879.6Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201978.9Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202079.69Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202179.92Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202264.76Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202371.75Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202472.55Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202575.5Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201177.38Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201276.93Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201375.97Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201474.75Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201574.69Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201673.69Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201773.8Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201873Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201971.7Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20148.71.62.92.22.1Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20157.31.71.721.9Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20169.82.3322.6Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20170.2000.10.1Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20180.40.20.10.10.1Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20192.30.10.60.70.9Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20202.40.70.60.70.5Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202100000Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20221.9000.61.3Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20234.20.60.81.21.7Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20243.61.40.70.60.8Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/20253.70.50.40.62.1Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/20261.3Up is Good PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2003/20047.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2004/20058.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2005/20069.2Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20078.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20087.8Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20099.4Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201010Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201110.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20129.3Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20138.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201411.3Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201511.1Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201614Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.9Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201813.5Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201911.9Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202011.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202113.3Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202213.4Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202312.9Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20249.7Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2001/200225.7Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2002/200319.5Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2003/200415.2Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2004/200519.6Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2005/200614.5Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20079.2Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200817.3Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200934.5Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201019.1Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201123.5Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201214.5Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201315.6Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201414.7Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201516.8Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201626.2Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201731Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201831.9Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201915.3Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020-4.7Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202145.3Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20228Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Due Feb 25Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Due Feb 26Up is Bad PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/200476.84Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/200577.28Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/200677.26Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/200777.79Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/200878.31Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/200978.97Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/201079.15Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/201179.36Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/201279.23Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/201379.47Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201479.34Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201580.05Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201680.2Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201780.34Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201880.12Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201980.04Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202080.11Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202179.82Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202279.81Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202379.47Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202479.77Up is Good PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20146.65Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20155.7Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20167.25Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20178.15Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189.34Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20198.78Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20208.62Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20218.84Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20229.84Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202310.57Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202410.08Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2010/201113.5Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201214.1Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201314.3Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201415.9Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201513.1Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20161316.920.821.313Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201716.1114.8614.3514.6616.1116.11Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201815.1915.1515.515.6415.6415.6515.4415.6515.6515.915.9415.4915.4915.5115.2115.1915.19Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201913.9614.9815.22151515.114.8314.5814.5814.614.2714.1914.1914.5214.5513.9613.96Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202014.1513.914.0313.9413.9413.9214.3114.3414.3414.2714.7914.5214.5214.0514.0214.1514.15Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/202112.7614.1414.2414.2514.2513.9213.8113.8513.8513.7213.8113.3813.3813.0912.9112.7612.76Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202213.1512.7212.4112.1612.1612.4112.3312.5212.5213.0212.9312.8512.8512.912.9913.1513.15Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/202313.112.913.513.713.713.513.814.614.614.213.413.313.313.31313.113.1Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/202414.913.313.513.713.713.514.414.614.615.515.715.615.615.614.614.914.9Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/202514.914.914.615151514.614.714.714.914.614.414.414.514.314.914.9Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/20261515.114.914.914.914.914.514.5Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2011/201264Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2012/201363Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2013/201463Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2014/201563.2Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2015/201669.3Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2016/201768.5Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2017/201863.9Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2018/201956.4Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2019/202058Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2020/202156.6Up is Bad PHOF44% of adults classified as overweight or obeseAnnualFinancial Year2014/201556.88Up is Bad PHOF44% of adults classified as overweight or obeseAnnualFinancial Year2015/201656.4Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201659.3Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201758.9Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201856.5Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201957.2Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202062.2Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202163.6Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202259.5Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202363.3Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202460.1Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201317.01Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201418.72Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201517.24Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201614.63Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.6Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201911.5Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2003/2004170.8Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2004/2005162.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2005/2006160.9Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2006/2007152.8Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2007/2008147.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2008/2009136.8Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2009/2010131.7Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2010/2011132.1Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012137.4Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013141Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014147.1Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015139.2Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016135.3Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017126.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018130.5Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019132.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020135.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021144.4Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022153.2Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023158.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024152.4Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2003/2004130.6Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2004/2005119.3Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2005/2006109.1Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2006/200799.4Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200893.7Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200985.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201078.3Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201177Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201275.5Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201372.1Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201473.3Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201569.4Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201667.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201765.1Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201864.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201967.5Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202065.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202166.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202265Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202368.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202465.9Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/2004186.2Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/2005170.3Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/2006157.4Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/2007147.5Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/2008138.8Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/2009127.2Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/2010117.8Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/2011116.6Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012119.3Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013114.1Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014115.4Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015101.6Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201698Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201792.8Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201894.5Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201996Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202091.7Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202192.5Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202291.9Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023102.3Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202496.7Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2003/2004157.8Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2004/2005152.3Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2005/2006151.5Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2006/2007144.8Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2007/2008146.3Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/2009141.3Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/2010142Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/2011138.5Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012146.3Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013149.5Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014149.8Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015139.9Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016130.4Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017130.5Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018132.9Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019133.9Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020132Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021128.2Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022134Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023131Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024130.9Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/2004190Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/2005180.4Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/2006188.2Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/2007175.6Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/2008170Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/2009154.9Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/2010154.8Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/2011152.5Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012160.1Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013163.6Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014170.8Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015162.7Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016154Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017145.5Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018147.8Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019142.8Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020146.4Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021141.7Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022152.6Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023144.7Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024141.3Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2003/200411.3Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2004/200514.5Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2005/200613.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2006/200715.3Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200815.7Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200914.5Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201013.2Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201111.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201213.4Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201315.1Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201413.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201513.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201615.2Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201716.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201816.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201914.9Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202013.9Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202114.4Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202214.3Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202318.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202419.5Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/200413.5Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/200516.1Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/200618Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/200720.7Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/200822.7Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/200920.3Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/201018.6Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/201115Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/201215.4Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/201316.7Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201416.1Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201516.4Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201618.4Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201720.2Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201823.2Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201920.9Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202018.5Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202116.4Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202215.7Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202322.1Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202425.5Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2003/200432.8Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2004/200530.6Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2005/200630.7Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2006/200727Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200826.2Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200926.1Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201029.2Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201132.2Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201233.2Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201331.9Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201432.6Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201531.1Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201630.8Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201728.1Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201829.1Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201933.2Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202033.8Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202131Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202223.8Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202323.5Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202425.6Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/200442.7Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/200536.2Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/200635.7Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/200735.5Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/200833.5Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/200933.9Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/201035.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/201136.6Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/201236.8Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/201335.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201437.2Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201535.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201632Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201729.9Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201831Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201937.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202035.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202134.3Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202225.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202326.8Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202428.7Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2003/20047.1Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2004/20057.8Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2005/20067.5Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20078.2Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20089Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200911.6Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201011.8Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201110.9Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20128.3Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.2Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20145.5Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20154.2Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20165.8Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20175.9Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20186.7Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20198.4Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20209Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20219.9Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20226.9Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20239.2Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202411.2Up is Bad PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201476.45.16.27Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20155.26.266.15.2Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20165.55.56.15.95.5Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20179.396.077.978.059.39Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20186.39.398.797.756.3Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20194.75.525.294.74.7Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20206.344.574.555.166.34Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/20213.46.55.334.963.4Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20224.383.864.033.594.38Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20235.423.825.535.355.42Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20244.45.454.235.374.4Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/20252.994.24.093.382.99Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201434.630.931.130.534.6Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201540.136.535.638.840.1Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201631.13834.833.331.1Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201738.0832.5137.9337.8938.08Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201832.1136.9333.9129.9632.11Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201929.230.3326.6131.529.2Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202027.7128.7132.4931.8427.71Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202129.329.327.6728.9729.3Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202226.527.6129.728.7326.5Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20232024.7821.419.9220Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202419.5221.9922.2223.319.52Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202517.1416.517.715.8417.14Up is Good PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2011/201243.5Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2012/201338.5Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2013/201442.3Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2014/201544.4Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2015/201652.9Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2016/201746.7Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2017/201847.1Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2018/201950Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2019/202058.3Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2020/202180Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2021/202283.3Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023100Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2023/202450Up is Bad PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201420.93.36.35.45.9Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201519.64.14.15.16.3Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201628.15.98.66.47.3Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20170.80.20.30.10.2Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20180.40.20.10.10.1Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201925.39.23.66.36.2Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202017.53.72.74.76.4Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202100000Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20221.9000.61.3Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20235.30.71.21.42Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20244.41.810.80.8Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/20254.50.70.50.82.5Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/20261.3Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201441.546.945.140.235.8Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201537.342.741.138.430.4Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201634.939.134.730.535.4Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201721.45.9010041.9Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018100100100100100Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20199.21.615.711.714.1Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202013.919.32114.87.1Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202100000Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202210000100100Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202379.87964.285.985Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202481.481708097Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202581.681807784Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202695Up is Good PHYS05% of Adults (aged 16+) who have taken part in sport and physical activity at least twice in the last 28 daysAnnualFinancial Year2016/201784.882.784.8Up is Good PHYS05% of Adults (aged 16+) who have taken part in sport and physical activity at least twice in the last 28 daysAnnualFinancial Year2017/201884.0185.2Up is Good PHYS05% of Adults (aged 16+) who have taken part in sport and physical activity at least twice in the last 28 daysAnnualFinancial Year2018/201987.78487.7Up is Good PHYS05% of Adults (aged 16+) who have taken part in sport and physical activity at least twice in the last 28 daysAnnualFinancial Year2019/202084.1Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201770.267.971.01Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201870.269.4Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201974.973.1Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202067.172.77Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20216366.763Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202266.566.566.5Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202370.470.4Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202469.869.8Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202576.576.5Up is Good POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2013/20142623Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2014/20152680Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2015/20162717Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2016/20172788Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2017/20182788Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2018/20192779Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2019/20202834Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2020/20212927Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2021/20222954Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2022/20233004Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2023/20243092Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2024/20253129Up is Bad PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/201296Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201395Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201493Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201593Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20169494949494Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201794.2594949495Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201893.892.791.294.994.2Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20199396949489Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20209598969595Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202189.2NC9397.789.2Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20228692858686Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202389.5939190.178.5Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20249392929493Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202590909189.990Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202691Up is Good PP07% of businesses that were compliant with legislation concerning the illegal use and sale of alcohol and tobaccoAnnualFinancial Year2011/201291Up is Good PP07% of businesses that were compliant with legislation concerning the illegal use and sale of alcohol and tobaccoAnnualFinancial Year2012/201398Up is Good PP07% of businesses that were compliant with legislation concerning the illegal use and sale of alcohol and tobaccoAnnualFinancial Year2013/201475Up is Good PP07% of businesses that were compliant with legislation concerning the illegal use and sale of alcohol and tobaccoAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015100Up is Good PP07% of businesses that were compliant with legislation concerning the illegal use and sale of alcohol and tobaccoAnnualFinancial Year2015/201663.2Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2011/201298Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2012/201399Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2013/20149998999999999998999998999997989798Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2014/201598979799989899989899989798989910099Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2015/20169898999998Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2016/20179897949796999896989899999898989998Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2017/201898100999899999997989998989898949696Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019989397979698989997999810099991009799Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2019/20209910099100100100981009910099989998989998Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021601001001271174046347587928583898686Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2021/20228784828283878586868393908791949092Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2022/20239385919490899095919798999893959695Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2023/202498989697979896989799999999969810098Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2024/202597949595959897979797971009895969896Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2025/20269596979696979897Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2011/2012100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2012/201399Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2013/2014100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017100100100NA100100NA100100NANANANA100NANA100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2023/2024100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2024/2025100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2025/2026100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2011/2012100Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2012/201397Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2013/20149392929895979592959696889583949793Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2014/20159389939693969495949696859292939393Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2015/20169091929383Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2016/20178567828076998991939185798566909283Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2017/20188384948788949195939285788567827274Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2018/20198673807275818779828897909290969493Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2019/20208987879489928991918990858890909190Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2020/20218276778880899183888583748187838386Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2021/20227278847980797355696271746969856974Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2022/20234735594546425140444468475326575345Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2023/20244754595757626162625242444624303730Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2024/20256938293935443694589295879192939593Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2025/20268591868794949494Up is Good PVP01People supported through personal budgets or direct payments receiving community-based services (%) (ADASS Survey definition)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201484.13Up is Good PVP01People supported through personal budgets or direct payments receiving community-based services (%) (ADASS Survey definition)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201591.2987.5387.9287.9291.1491.1488.0989.3388.5788.5789.2190.2591.2991.29Up is Good PVP01People supported through personal budgets or direct payments receiving community-based services (%) (ADASS Survey definition)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201693.8892.292.592.8192.593.1293.3293.5693.3394.2894.294.4994.3295.0795.3195.6695.35Up is Good PVP01People supported through personal budgets or direct payments receiving community-based services (%) (ADASS Survey definition)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NC91.3388.8691.8990.6988.3389.7286.9988.3589.68NCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Good PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/20152413120197022162058212019603016753Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201626028182874192130701316255423192062Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201724834211570231827681318225320221557Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20182461719256120272370172037741518841Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20192523535209024191760251919632181039Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20202012227196830211162121513401213631Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/20211721151127131517451115275317141647Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202221718192057242013571223175212182151Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/202321624251766222317621416144410112344Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/20242052314215816211855721134116142151Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/202524815202459212927771515154532171867Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/2026242320671314734Up is Bad PVP04Total number of Acute delayed discharges (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/20151204813251121427111912421051126Up is Bad PVP04Total number of Acute delayed discharges (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016189615163715172153620184425121855Up is Bad PVP04Total number of Acute delayed discharges (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017124161573858102310137301181433Up is Bad PVP04Total number of Acute delayed discharges (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018NA67922316726NANANANANANANANAUp is Bad PVP05Total number of reimbursable CYC delays (attributable to CYC) (YDH Only)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015115641222131111351516134482414Up is Bad PVP05Total number of reimbursable CYC delays (attributable to CYC) (YDH Only)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20161373911231291435111310342481345Up is Bad PVP05Total number of reimbursable CYC delays (attributable to CYC) (YDH Only)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20178915121138638175771943815Up is Bad PVP05Total number of reimbursable CYC delays (attributable to CYC) (YDH Only)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018NA62816115622NANANANANANANANAUp is Bad PVP06Reablement - assessments to be completed within 6 weeks of referralMonthlyFinancial Year2014/201526.8454.5539.292037.9563.6453.3358.4929.4126.6746.1534.0816.671053.8526.84Up is Good PVP06Reablement - assessments to be completed within 6 weeks of referralMonthlyFinancial Year2015/201621.6327.2730.7733.3330.4618.1833.332525.5255.8812.514.461533.33016.11Up is Good PVP06Reablement - assessments to be completed within 6 weeks of referralMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NC16.67012.59.72037.5101633.33NCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Good PVP07OT/OTA assessments - to be completed within 28 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2014/201595.8798.2897.6297.4497.7897.6499.7698.798.5398.4696.6797.8993.7596.4897.3795.87Up is Good PVP07OT/OTA assessments - to be completed within 28 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2015/201696.9797.1298.1195.897.0197.995.997.1296.9797.6496.9296.196.8997.4897.2296.3297.01Up is Good PVP07OT/OTA assessments - to be completed within 28 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NC97.8497.0690.5795.1595.6291.7294.7894.0492.86NCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Good PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/20131784Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/20141753Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201514871810183018301806180613351448150115011508102714871487Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201617621764178317761774175617531765175817361741175417441751179717691772Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201718821945187918841902190019241899190718811896186718811850184018231837Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201818811737171317171856171216981719185616881667162918601639162615771881Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201916651887188418821884188118691854186818401737169817581699166116351665Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202016061737171317171719171216981719172516881667162916471639162615771606Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/202116871680173517731773181418061830183018531853182118211773175116871687Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202217281680Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/20132822Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/20142570Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201526432550252025202582258227082688266826682690313526432643Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201624352444242224372434242824232415242224332427243024302451243924712454Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017931948958898935903906934914916922917918921987967958Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018857929922926904932962955917961945956892949951959857Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20191037912930924922933936920929935100310209861022104710421037Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020958929922926927932962955955961945956955949951959958Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021925908899900900873919933933922935946946931925925925Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022937941Neutral PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2013/20141712.73Up is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2014/20151344.96Up is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2015/20161434.68Up is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018NCUp is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024150234772711401502Up is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2024/20252712483107218742712Up is Good PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201514Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016224648Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017161124101221361304Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018222316211424281214Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019215229102332272002Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20202642410232712032406Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021203227033630251102Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/20223122610423921253137Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023271258141604041179Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/2024111102121422150000Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/2025182046222600111045Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/202622373205Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015447226324136687013843848910655715505251646417264210891Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201662003575254341316470506495147152247953515367374686721877Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201735164793502431072224194304722239331293863231264364859Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018383026725726578923937938410023524253971174227287351865Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201962865584674801505335636487145854549162816645505355741659Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020NC727740634210165752056617434823684631313535375NCNCUp is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015286117631130479137831527496742519014776221510323341Up is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016202243128119290149121111381210298292800154193204551Up is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20172860270253324784200205270675272235297804151149237537Up is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018200418616711046313911222447519818923462119814899445Up is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201918261991771995758592211388178177119474159129101389Up is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020NC1601471985059384117294551987161172121NCNCUp is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad PVP28Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (TEWV only)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20173822296740750354853640514894525153741341196106187489Up is Bad PVP28Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (TEWV only)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20182156295211116622911131313357360247380310280229819Up is Bad PVP28Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (TEWV only)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20192708233274326833195243261699290188170648171130227528Up is Bad PVP28Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (TEWV only)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020NC212186119517273138213183173121477124193NCNCUp is Bad PVP28Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (TEWV only)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/20136.5Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/20146.5Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/20157.8Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20165.76.46.36.36.36.26.1665.75.65.55.55.45.55.75.7Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20177.36.26.56.66.66.76.97.17.17.27.47.47.67.67.57.37.3Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20187.176.96.86.86.86.87776.66.96.97.17.17.17.1Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20197.727.37.2776.97.17.37.37.47.67.57.57.57.677.727.72Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20207.017.937.897.847.847.877.847.757.757.757.647.627.627.367.067.017.01Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/20214.886.916.836.716.716.576.76.716.716.386.155.755.755.495.284.884.88Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202210.535.065.595.935.936.266.246.496.496.877.427.767.768.789.3510.5310.53Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/20239.3510.4510.4510.4910.4910.6410.710.7210.7210.710.6710.8310.8310.159.899.359.35Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/20249.419.249.279.369.369.249.319.359.359.579.489.639.639.649.749.419.41Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/20258.839.679.79.739.739.669.759.619.619.229.058.758.758.748.758.838.83Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/20268.598.418.348.348.478.44Up is Bad TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/2014NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201765.4664NC65.46NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201864.8170.51NC64.81NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201972.5266.11NC72.52NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202074.7471.52NC74.74NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202268.7572NC68.75NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202364.6868.0564.68Up is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202472.2462.6372.24Up is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202567.9463.4267.94Up is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202665.09Up is Good TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/2014NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201726.127.3NC26.1NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201827.2523.06NC27.25NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201919.425.89NC19.4NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202017.1121.41NC17.11NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202220.9119NC20.91NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202328.8322.4128.83Up is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202417.6126.0517.61Up is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202524.4328.4224.43Up is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202620.21Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2014/201511739992492221430927309274220059578750917509184624941939974299742104929112241117399117399Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2015/20164161228114692739273957401106115330153302027424597280462804633717362544161241612Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2016/201731188221548787662766295811549418670186702210824550264452644528009288453118831188Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2017/2018125339982488384938494607610672517251851388959575957510510113561263312533Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2018/201914036535695128512852255358047454745625072707950795011386133191403614036Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2019/2020145811195252030813081513962777017701776458797104281042811193124661458114581Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2020/20215689910860162862070520705234912596528940289403413939432436564365648360521365688956899Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2021/202229996164141557141714189691003512708127081474017842216552165524830275862999629996Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2022/202332573270766051002510025121341395816259162591908121461239702397028229302473257332573Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2023/202427845292846356277627787661137313821138211626217486209572095724351259992784527845Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2024/20251953116582135588058808018912411051110511212014147150781507816595174071953119531Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2025/20262801459962656265744786031025410254Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2014/20151856352283849663677386773888554102823121670121670113647144486155684155684160620173757185635185635Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2015/20161584148581190823654236543427946253636816368183477102686115041115041134132147726158414158414Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2016/20171709291833028630413304133053539737268976189761102157114703123092123092141253150071170929170929Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2017/2018148987107742123641341413415372158479766477664786541103492112396112396123488139862148987148987Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2018/20191911641511228351418184181854503657969066790667108156125793144187144187147926175207191164191164Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2019/20201728831119625317388433884366558740548187981879101300119484132407132407146488162973172883172883Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2020/20212366391165130062434244342455110741869750897508120650149803168685168685177417203999236639236639Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2021/20222317622216045314594885948888817102763119112119112132206150855183705183705200008217181231762231762Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2022/20232925162315246313625516255186820111087135445135445158889184121207186207186254658274099292516292516Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2023/202431905723935527208790387903119514146989151551151551175363208150229415229415265840303421319057319057Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2024/202519949541460734609713797137133604139614146289146289154619166754173669173669182712191750199495199495Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2025/20261687024281347933479353448674238007580075Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2014/2015398753083489580588058159292156923984239842850027035285132851331230336873987539875Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2015/201626745113728156991699110171896111916119161453816821181971819723123239022674526745Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2016/2017239576893115081208412084126931297615735157351698117711196491964921625229892395723957Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2017/201818557807797501104411044115241330014659146591538316047163421634217597179961855718557Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2018/20191883210199112391242412424143501409815790157901666817844181321813217796177961883218832Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2019/202089855456632064266426752974047435743581578543860786079094901989858985Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2020/2021109984273446451885188579850526297629764377756883588351035599991099810998Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2021/202210738233822982298229828022745319731973197354438843884492953541073810738Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2022/202318910356453625889588957105150547854781250867077092709211596115091891018910Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2023/202474064114287432853285304024212530253045822867582558256164629274067406Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2024/2025120102487630932143214426942694972497269278565628362836510111331201012010Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2025/20265324532410177101777454758474437443Up is Bad YCC013YFAS Number of Food vouchers - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015747243636515970707373747474747474Neutral YCC013YFAS Number of Food vouchers - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNeutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2014/20153180300683998998132816471988198822302432260526052803299231803180Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2015/20161325901552552552932935825827208519589581091119713251325Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2016/20171256461652842843804966156157298269249241043111212561256Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2017/2018115978194279279376495589589681764863863974107411591159Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2018/201913281101732492493634705715717218539429421064120013281328Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2019/202092430176270270420478535535598734845845906924924924Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2020/202117072524015355356337518758759381112124612461444155617071707Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2021/202213181092082842844094725925926348099429421063116413181318Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2022/20231507112248364364467574626626813967108910891300133015071507Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2023/20241262631722912913884955845846998139319311081116612621262Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2024/2025105311320227427437944851751762572279679688793810531053Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2025/202689151260260325422487487Neutral YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201612.0511.1511.5911.5911.8312.1612.1611.8912.0412.0411.912.1312.0512.05Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201711.2612.0711.8612.1312.1312.0811.9712.0112.0111.9212.0311.511.511.6311.4911.2611.26Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018NC11.2410.9710.7410.7411.18NC11.2311.2310.9610.82NCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201911.9810.911.4512.2511.98Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202010.5811.2610.4410.310.58Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202110.7611.4811.9911.3910.76Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20228.599.928.598.298.59Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20238.298.048.799.218.29Up is Bad APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20140Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCNeutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20160.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20190.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20200.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20210.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20220.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCNeutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024N/CNeutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NCNeutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018NCNCNeutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201927.2420.326.431.7327.0929.7625.4128.7428.0225.2328.236.7830.2928.9120.6119.5423.62Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202025.8622.9122.6220.2822.0420.1522.526.8823.1124.7933.5330.1929.9831.6122.1932.3429.08Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/202131.5933.6234.2535.7234.6629.9230.6935.1332.132.0235.937.0434.9230.523.8223.5526.12Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202223.3820.1527.0516.2620.9815.923.2120.6219.7326.4825.9530.4827.4628.6724.5224.525.64Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/202317.4426.2816.6813.7518.7615.7517.9712.3315.4610.5417.0417.6314.8219.1522.4418.8620.02Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/202417.9816.0717.1320.6818.1818.7718.7315.9917.7522.0615.8221.5419.519.7115.0814.316.49Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/202513.2613.098.3313.1411.4911.3512.314.2312.5114.9116.189.5513.4616.8312.420.6216.14Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/202619.32NANANANANANANANANANANANeutral ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018NCUp is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20195.724.94.84.14.15.175.124.944.9454.864.524.524.985.315.725.72Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20204.875.15.065.25.25.165.144.844.844.674.43.853.853.823.944.874.87Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/20215.365.315.965.695.695.876.457.147.147.77.457.937.937.125.975.365.36Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/20228.265.675.486.076.075.396.135.755.756.86.576.966.967.877.848.268.26Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/202311.997.817.747.457.457.38.28.678.679.329.8510.5310.5311.4411.1111.9911.99Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/202411.2311.5311.612.2212.2212.0411.1210.6410.6411.0811.3311.6811.6811.3911.5611.2311.23Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/202510.0511.2610.9810.8510.8510.7510.6510.0810.0810.439.99.659.6510.039.3810.0510.05Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/20269.979.169.519.519.389.519.059.059.39.9610.710.7Up is Good ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202021232149213421352135216621962209220921872170216921692169214321232123Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/202121582154216122092209219922262258225822502253222222222154214721582158Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202220372153217621792179216421322123212321112106208420842068206320372037Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/202320902034205720712071207620962114211420902092206820682064207320902090Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/202420652070209020822082209720892088208820912087207820782052206320652065Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/202521162052207620892089204920702081208120952102209920992077210421162116Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/2026210021012097209721132127211721172145212921402140Neutral ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201875Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201979Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202076Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202180Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202279Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202378Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202481Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201868Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201973Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202072Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202173Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202271Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202377Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202476Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2011/201273.1Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2012/201363.2Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2013/201482.6Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2014/201591.8Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2015/201682.681.881.88281.981.981.781.781.881.681.581.381.581.681.684.282.47Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2016/201782.2684.184.384.584.384.6884.298484.3284.1681.4481.7282.4479.3379.7680.6579.91Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2017/20188280.1879.779.779.8679.5979.4179.0179.3378.9678.4177.5378.2977.3177.2977.0777.22Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2018/201981.477.1277.1276.2376.8276.3176.3876.3876.3676.1376.2876.0576.1574.9374.9374.9374.93Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2019/202081.8Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2020/202184.1NAUp is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2021/202284.8Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2022/202384.4Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2023/202485.8Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201253.9Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201363.9Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201468.7Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201555.1Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201628.5Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201739.2120.2220.5321.2620.6937.5538.0538.9738.1944.6746.4946.2245.8350.4652.6453.2452.14Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20186948475249586770577981816582828369Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20198483838483868685858584838483838284Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20208084828283818180828080808179787780Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/20217378777677757372757371717471716873Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/20224653535152484745474544444442414141Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/20233440393638373535373535343632312535Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/20243024302830242427232222252120Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2013/201443Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2014/201546.6Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2015/201645.8Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2016/201749.5Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2017/201844.5Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2018/201943.4Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2019/202045.5Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2020/202135.4Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2021/202239.7Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2022/202341.3Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2023/202450.2Up is Good ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20127Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20137.7Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201411.5Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20159.9Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201611.32.282.283.053.053.816.097.617.618.379.910.6610.6613.714.4616.7516.75Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201711.180.750.752.252.25333.763.765.266.018.268.269.0111.2711.2711.27Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201815.71.493.734.474.475.966.717.457.458.9511.9313.4213.4214.1615.6516.416.4Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201910.43.735.226.716.717.457.458.958.9511.1812.6714.1614.1615.6515.6515.6515.65Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202019.22.984.477.457.458.9511.1812.6712.6713.4214.9114.9114.9116.419.3819.3819.38Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202113.32.243.735.225.225.227.459.699.6911.9311.9313.4213.4214.1614.9114.9114.91Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202222.1Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202316.4Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20248.3Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201611.422.2800.763.050.762.281.524.570.761.520.763.053.050.762.286.09Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201711.270.7501.52.250.7500.751.51.50.752.254.50.752.2503Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201815.71.492.240.754.481.490.750.752.981.492.981.495.960.751.490.752.99Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201910.43.731.491.496.710.7501.492.242.241.491.495.221.49001.49Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020NC2.981.492.987.451.492.241.495.220.751.4902.241.492.9804.47Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NC2.241.491.495.2202.242.244.472.2401.493.730.750.7501.49Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/20221.491.494.477.452.241.491.495.22Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012608.4Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013617.7Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014767.5Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015630.8Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016683.176.8126.17202.97202.97255.08312.68394.96394.96430.62474.51543.08543.08606.16658.27713.13713.13Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017647.891.8148.5189189251.1299.7372.6372.6407.7456.3515.7515.7569.7629.1669.6669.6Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018649.445.3295.97162.62162.62215.94287.92349.23349.23394.55447.87546.51546.51586.49634.48655.81655.81Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019668.693.31186.61239.93239.93303.91354.56399.88399.88466.53517.18567.83567.83623.82645.14671.8671.8Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020539.658.65130.63181.28181.28261.26317.24346.57346.57378.56418.54453.2453.2495.85530.51546.51546.51Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021347.329.3242.6571.9871.98106.64146.62191.94191.94221.27261.26333.24333.24378.56415.88458.53458.53Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022499Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023479.5Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024524.2Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016693.9376.849.3776.8202.9752.1157.682.28191.9935.6643.8868.57148.1163.0852.1154.86170.05Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017656.191.856.740.518962.148.672.9183.635.148.659.4143.15459.440.5153.9Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018649.445.3250.6566.65162.6253.3271.9861.32186.6245.3253.3298.64197.2839.9947.9921.33109.31Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019668.693.3193.3153.32239.9363.9850.6545.32159.9566.6550.6550.65167.9555.9821.3326.66103.97Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020NC58.6571.9850.65181.2879.9855.9829.32165.2831.9939.9934.66106.6431.9934.661682.64Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NC29.3213.3329.3271.9834.6639.9945.32119.9629.3239.9971.98141.2945.3237.3242.65125.3Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202242.6550.6547.99141.2950.6539.9916106.64Up is Bad ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012100Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2012/201369.8Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2013/201480.9Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2014/201581.5Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2015/201675.7Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2016/201779.25Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2017/201892.5Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2018/201983Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2019/202080.6Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2020/202184.8Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2021/202288.2Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2022/202383.6Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2023/202491.2Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2011/20120.4Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2012/20130.7Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2013/20141.1Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2014/20150.9Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2015/20162.2Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.78Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.8Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2018/20190.7Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2019/20200.5Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2020/20210.5Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2021/20220.5Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2022/20231.1Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2023/20241.9Up is Good ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201217.3Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201318.2Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201417.6Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201511.69.1511.9813.0113.0112.3512.5613.0113.0113.1613.5713.1513.1512.8712.1411.8911.89Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201613.26.559.5310.7310.7310.8811.3211.8211.8211.4112.0712.3212.3213.2913.3113.3613.36Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201716.8518.2216.1617.6317.6317.6317.8718.0218.0218.1318.5918.0218.0217.2216.7216.8516.85Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201813.514.513.412.112.111.411.411.911.912.112.413.113.113.313.413.513.5Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201917.319.818.819.219.217.417.617.717.71817.817.717.717.617.617.517.5Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202015.421.821.120.320.318.717.517.317.316.71615.615.615.715.6Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201613.366.5512.5113.1110.7211.3213.1114.312.918.9416.6814.313.3122.0511.3216.0916.49Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201716.8518.2214.120.5717.6317.6318.8118.8118.4118.8121.7413.5218.029.9911.7518.2213.32Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201813.514.512.39.612.19.111.414.611.713.214.518.715.514.915.113.914.6Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201917.319.817.82019.211.818.318.616.219.416.617.217.716.716.91716.7Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202021.820.518.520.314.212.71614.313.510.912.712.416.115.2Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/20123.2Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201310.7Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201411.1Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/20156.34.273.965.085.085.795.986.26.26.627.097.257.257.086.66.356.35Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20166.92.383.874.774.775.365.365.865.865.966.186.166.166.976.836.956.95Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20177.499.48.239.999.999.999.649.319.318.99.048.758.758.117.647.497.49Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20186.45.85.14.64.64.64.55.25.25.666.56.56.56.56.46.4Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20196.67.37.67.97.96.97.27.47.47.57.57.27.276.86.66.6Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20204.95.35.45.95.95.85.65.65.65.55.15555Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20166.952.385.366.554.767.155.368.346.956.557.755.966.7514.35.368.349.33Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20177.499.47.0513.529.999.998.237.648.626.469.996.467.632.352.945.883.72Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20186.45.84.43.74.64.64.38.45.87.98.810.396.86.44.86Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20196.67.388.47.94.18.28.678.17.456.84.65.64.24.8Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20205.35.47.15.95.54.95.75.44.52.643.75.34.8Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2011/201264Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2012/201365.8Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2013/201467.4Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2014/201567.1Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2015/201664Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2016/201762.4Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2017/201862.9Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2018/201963.8Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2019/202068.1Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2020/202172.3Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2021/202265.1Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2022/202366.5Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2023/202465.1Up is Good BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2010/20110Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2011/201227Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2012/201336Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2013/201415Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2014/20153Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2015/20160000Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017298Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018546Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019713Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020832Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021685Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022367Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023119Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024140Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025144144Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201144Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201237.04Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201334.42Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201429.51Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.07Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201628.02Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201728.7Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201827.61Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201927.6Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202027.6Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202121.5NANANAUp is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202225.1NAUp is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202324.1Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202423.4Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202518.2Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201149.98Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201243.61Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201340.61Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201434.36Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201535.08Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201630.81Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201732.6Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201829.94Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201929.7Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202029.9Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202121.9NANANAUp is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202225.5NAUp is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202324.4Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202421.8Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202520.4Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201152.07Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201246.36Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201343.28Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201437.79Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201538.18Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201635.02Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201736Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201833.14Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201933.7Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202033.3Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202125.8NANANAUp is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202228.7NAUp is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202327.9Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202425.8Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202522.3Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201147.51Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201237.34Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201335.37Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201431.05Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.71Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201628.91Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201729.9Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201827.33Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201927.3Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202027.3Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202120.7NANANAUp is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202222.8NAUp is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202321.7Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202420.1Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202519.5Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201144.57Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201242.84Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201339.6Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201435.67Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201534.34Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201631.44Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201732.4Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201829.87Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201929.6Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202029.8Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202122.5NANANAUp is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202225NAUp is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202323.8Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202422.2Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202520Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201142.88Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201236.18Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201333.19Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201428.03Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201530.09Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201628.49Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201727.4Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201826.93Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201925.4Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202025.9Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202119NANANAUp is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202219.2NAUp is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202319.2Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202419.5Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202518Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201151.33Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201249.48Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201342.98Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201438.38Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201540.47Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201635.16Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201735.8Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201833.26Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201934.2Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202033.8Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202128.5NANANAUp is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202232.7NAUp is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202333Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202429.8Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202523.2Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201174.86Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201262.32Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201352.43Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201445.49Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201549.67Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201643.87Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201745.2Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201842.79Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201946.1Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202046.5Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202136.7NANANAUp is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202239.1NAUp is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202340.6Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202434.4Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202525.5Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201146.63Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201241.6Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201339.91Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201436.08Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201537.6Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201631.85Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201734.7Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201831.72Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201931.8Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202031.4Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202124.4NANANAUp is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202229.2NAUp is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202328.45Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202427Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202520.9Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201166.14Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201257.71Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201350.96Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201440.83Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201542Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201637.51Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201736.9Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201836.35Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201935.6Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202037.4Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202127.2NANANAUp is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202232.8NAUp is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202330.62Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202425.7Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202524.8Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201173.37Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201262.49Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201354.23Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201451.59Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201549.18Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201646.92Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201747.7Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201845.86Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201946.3Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202045.5Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202135NANANAUp is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202243.5NAUp is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202341.33Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202437.1Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202532.4Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201156.68Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201248.06Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201345.51Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201439.97Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201545.22Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201637.68Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201737.5Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201836.24Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201936.1Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202037.8Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202129.2NANANAUp is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202232.9NAUp is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202330.39Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202428.8Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202525.4Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201155.63Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201262.64Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201356.46Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201447.45Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201546.97Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201644.59Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201742.7Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201842.78Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201941.8Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202038.9Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202132.5NANANAUp is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202233.7NAUp is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202333.77Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202430.9Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202528.1Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201155.76Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201246.34Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201343.16Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201436.29Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201539.46Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201636.83Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201735.5Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201835.25Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201932.7Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202033.1Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202124.6NANANAUp is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202225.4NAUp is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202325.97Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202425Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202523.9Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201161.36Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201262.01Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201361.67Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201450.71Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201552.17Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201647.13Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201747.5Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201843.93Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201946.6Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202044.3Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202140.2NANANAUp is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202247.5NAUp is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202347.26Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202442.6Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202531.1Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201181.38Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201268.85Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201361.75Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201450.85Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201554.75Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201647.98Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201749.9Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201845.77Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201945.5Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202046.7Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202138.8NANANAUp is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202240.5NAUp is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202343.73Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202436.6Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202528.5Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2005/20066.96.9Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20076.96.9Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20086.36.3Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20096.16.1Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20105.65.6Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20115.85.8Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20125.25.2Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20135.45.4Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20145.25.2Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20154.74.7Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20164.54.5Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20174.34.3Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201844Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20193.93.9Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20203.83.8Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20213.4Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20223.9Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20233.5Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20243.2Up is Bad CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2009100Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2010116Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2011126Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2012138Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2013151Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2014156Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2015145Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2016149Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2017141Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2018147Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2019141Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2020117Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2021107Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2022115Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2023114Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2024102Up is Good CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2003/20043.7Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2004/20053.5Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2005/20064.9Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2006/20075.6Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2007/20086Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2008/20094.7Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2009/20105Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2010/20115Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2011/20125Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2012/20133.8Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2013/20143.5Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2014/20152.9Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2015/20162.8Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2016/20172.5Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2017/20183.4Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2018/20194.6Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2019/20203.9Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2020/20213.5Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2021/20222.8Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2022/20233.1Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2023/20243.2Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NCUp is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/201312.9Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/201410.8Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/201510.4Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/20169.5Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.7Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/201812.8Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/201913.9Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020NCUp is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2007/200824.1Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2008/200924.1Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2009/201024.1Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2010/201124.1Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2011/201224.7Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2012/201324.7Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2013/201424.7Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2014/201516.4Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2015/201616.4Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2016/201715.9Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2017/201815.9Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2018/201918.9Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2019/202018.9Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2020/202118.9Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20110.9Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20121Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20131.3Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20141.3Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20150.7Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20160.9Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.8Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.9Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20190.6Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20200.9Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20210.9Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20231Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2010/201153.1Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/201261Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/201363.2Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/201463.4Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/201572.2Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/201693.1Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017100.9Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/201888.5Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/201983.6Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/202072Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/202167.5Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/202242.3Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/202333Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/202426.5Up is Bad CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201173.66Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201273.36Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201373.99Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201469Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NANeutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201777.1Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018NCNeutral CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022603.6Up is Bad CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023601.7Up is Bad CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024603.5Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2010/2011108.8Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012103.3Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013109.4Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014111.2Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015121.9Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016140.8Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017136.4Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018136.8Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019126.7Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/202094.7Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/202184Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/202291.6Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/202381.8Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/202467.6Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014142.7Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015129.7Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016103.7Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017143.3Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018157.3Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019132.4Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020119.4Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/202139.9Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/202280.2Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023107Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024120.4Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2010/201142.4Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/201255.6Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013111.6Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/201497.3Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015111Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016180.7Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017111.6Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/201898.5Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019127.4Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/202099.1Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021114.1Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022173Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023144.8Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024115.6Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012338.81Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013435Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014407.79Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015562.5Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016692.03Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017658.1Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018565.64Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019508.04Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020365.08Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021457.38Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022390.86Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023254.51Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024178.3Up is Bad CHP34aAbsolute gap in % of children totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks between highest and lowest York ward (4 year aggregated ward data)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202136.5Up is Bad CHP34aAbsolute gap in % of children totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks between highest and lowest York ward (4 year aggregated ward data)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202236.7Up is Bad CHP34aAbsolute gap in % of children totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks between highest and lowest York ward (4 year aggregated ward data)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202338.98Up is Bad CHP34aAbsolute gap in % of children totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks between highest and lowest York ward (4 year aggregated ward data)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202439.3Up is Bad CHP34aAbsolute gap in % of children totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks between highest and lowest York ward (4 year aggregated ward data)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202536.43Up is Bad CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/2014153.23132.92140.04153.23Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015307.08158.83153.54248.84307.08Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016468.52314.67458.03492.99468.52Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/2017538548453458538Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018454373372418454Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/2019482412455435482Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/2020504443504Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201455.8859.8457.3255.88Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201561.460.9858.0660.9861.4Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201663.6460.6761.0658.5463.64Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201767.853.259.362.167.8Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201865.168.267.666.165.1Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201970.474.671.76370.1Up is Good CMHD05People entering IAPT (in month) as % of those estimated to have anxiety/depression (VoY CCG) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20177.513.28.47.57.5Neutral CMHD05People entering IAPT (in month) as % of those estimated to have anxiety/depression (VoY CCG) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201815.57.78.611.311.39.811.110.410.410.612.510.610.616.114.615.515.5Neutral CMHD05People entering IAPT (in month) as % of those estimated to have anxiety/depression (VoY CCG) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201914.414.611.514.814.81515.413.413.415.71.216.716.716.313.214.414.4Neutral CMHD05People entering IAPT (in month) as % of those estimated to have anxiety/depression (VoY CCG) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20201813.418Neutral CMHP15ANumber of bed days in secondary mental health care hospitals, per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20144786.444976.024975.665069.744786.44Up is Bad CMHP15ANumber of bed days in secondary mental health care hospitals, per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20158285.595022.715282.146566.948285.89Up is Bad CMHP15ANumber of bed days in secondary mental health care hospitals, per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20164989.346522.55971.825997.174989.34Up is Bad CMHP15ANumber of bed days in secondary mental health care hospitals, per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20174252.324413.084285.164324.924252.32Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2006/20072.6Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2007/20082.3Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2008/20092.2Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2009/20102.2Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2010/20112.2Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/20121.6Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/20132.2Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20142.3Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015321.4Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20161.7Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20172.6Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20182.4Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20193.5Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20202.7Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/20211.5Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20221.8Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20232.7Up is Bad CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2010/201195.8Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/201295.25Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201396.25Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201495.78Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201595.1595.794.3NC96.3Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20169695.893.694.695.1Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201796.376.495.696.495.5Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201895.61Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201995.86Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202095.17Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202195.59Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202293.54Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202394.5Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202496Up is Good CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015521820104Up is Bad CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016226781Up is Bad CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201843116818Up is Bad CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/2020NAUp is Bad CSB16aHospital admissions for dental caries (0-4 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015368.7Up is Bad CSB16aHospital admissions for dental caries (0-4 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016342.9Up is Bad CSB16aHospital admissions for dental caries (0-4 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017353.55Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018480.2Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019534.3Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020507Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021418.1Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022277.4Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023126.6Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/202464.8Up is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015263797Up is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20163371484Up is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201713Up is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018NC2Up is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/2020NAUp is Bad CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20153891301076983Neutral CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201625578547350Neutral CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201713025412044Neutral CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201819246664040Neutral CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201922946634575Neutral CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202012698Neutral CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2009/20101632Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2010/20111726Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2011/20121953Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2012/20131593149130122401122112132366151140143434117135140392Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2013/20141530121114119354125168132425161123133417107114113334Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2014/20151808113133158404177216135528158155197510128113125366Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2015/201615181281181333791631531354511381071273728591140316Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017139999137148384154124108386122981313519075113278Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018111510780892761001271293561008676262736484221Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2018/20199998176842417610593274907592257777674227Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2019/20209037889712386893672289187100278475557159Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2020/202155737233191726256190533110218647182590Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022656575369179676144172604776183393944122Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2022/20234233644381183333309619323889324741120Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2023/2024625454144130636569197394551135384778163Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2024/2025729594973181728168221584669173604351154Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2025/202657514315179875021648547Up is Bad CSP29bNumber of Incidents of Alcohol Related ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017594336648147695352174493663148423449125Up is Bad CSP29bNumber of Incidents of Alcohol Related ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018NC5435421313750431303633NCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad CSP29bNumber of Incidents of Alcohol Related ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANAUp is Bad EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2012/20131062Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2013/20141728Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2014/20151683Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2015/20161457Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2016/20171864Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2017/20181986Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2018/20191691Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2019/20201737Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2020/20211225Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2021/20221250Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2022/20231378Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2023/20241266Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2024/20251191Up is Good EH1AChlamydia diagnoses (15-19 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201419221344153218141922Up is Good EH1AChlamydia diagnoses (15-19 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201514161756164015321416Up is Good EH1AChlamydia diagnoses (15-19 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201613661438Up is Good EH1BChlamydia diagnoses (20-24 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201417341200150816741734Up is Good EH1BChlamydia diagnoses (20-24 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201514951793162315041495Up is Good EH1BChlamydia diagnoses (20-24 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201614531518Up is Good EH1BChlamydia diagnoses (20-24 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018457Up is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2021/202226.5Up is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2022/202321Up is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2023/202417.1Up is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2024/202515.8Up is Good HLTH01aPupils achieving a Good Level of Development at age 5 (%)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201464.8Up is Good HLTH01aPupils achieving a Good Level of Development at age 5 (%)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201774.3Up is Good HLTH02aLimiting long term illness or disability (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201515.3Up is Bad HLTH03aProvision of 1 hour or more unpaid care per week (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20159.2Up is Bad HLTH04aPensioners living alone (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.3Up is Bad HLTH05aObese adults (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201523Up is Bad HLTH06aBinge drinking adults (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201529.7Up is Bad HLTH07aHealthy eating adults (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201528.3Up is Good HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015104.3Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201697.1Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018141.3Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020153.8Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021141.1Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024145Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Aug 2026Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20157.6Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20167.3Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201810.1Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202010.2Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202111.7Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202410.4Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Aug 2026Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20158.3Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20166.6Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20187.9Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20208.2Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202111.1Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20248.1Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Aug 2026Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201597.1Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016110.2Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018126.2Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020133.2Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021119.6Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Aug 2026Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201555.6Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201659.2Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201870.7Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202188.8Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Aug 2026Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/202069380Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/202152740Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/202263245Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/202030775Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/202122880Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/202227890Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/202038605Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/202129855Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/202235350Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/20207240Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/20214930Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/20226395Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/202032215Neutral HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/202125585Neutral HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/202229625Neutral HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Neutral HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Neutral HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Neutral HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/202029925Up is Bad HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/202122225Up is Bad HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/202227230Up is Bad HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Up is Bad HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201674.423.3562.645974.4Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201778.374.3270.1473.778.3Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201885.6184.285.484.785.61Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201985.98788.288.785.9Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202087.7886.3387.3986.6287.78Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202177.6255.0959.7173.6777.62Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202266.7579.6883.5483.6966.75Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202386.2672.3284.7386.5786.26Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202474.285.2487.9182.9474.2Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202562.2470.9668.0166.6762.24Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202684.6284.08Up is Good HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201621.767.9830.573521.7Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201712.7721.2119.6417.712.77Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20189.9112.310.111.99.91Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201911.711.710.59.611.7Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202010.2312.2311.0411.7410.23Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202121.8237.9739.0726.121.82Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202232.2118.7215.515.1132.21Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202312.8727.6813.7912.4412.87Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202425.2213.9312.0915.4925.22Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202535.9927.1231.1832.2835.99Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202613.3912.85Up is Bad HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201670.861.5463.166570.8Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201777.0975.2278.9677.877.09Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201882.4682.783.183.282.46Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201989.285.386.488.489.2Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202087.5988.5588.8988.5687.59Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202188.6982.2684.1987.5288.69Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202285.4487.9487.248785.44Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20238686.4786.8484.8386Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202482.568788.7486.7482.56Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202586.2286.1980.586.0886.22Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202686.2983.78Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201630.130.5925.822130.1Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201744.2334.0336.8735.744.23Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201843.1544.544.342.343.15Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201949.3844.645.748.6749.38Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202048.3946.9245.6350.8948.39Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202149.145.0145.7350.349.1Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202248.5247.853.1448.4348.52Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202350.8650.3852.6549.7950.86Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202451.1650.595053.9351.16Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202554.6351.6748.3951.6554.63Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202647.9751.6Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201616.7718.1620.811820.4Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201741.6523.9821.662541.65Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201872.2165.7736972.21Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201981.878.479.883.881.8Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202086.1483.1583.8686.2986.14Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202168.5681.8985.7580.7868.56Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202288.3864.1885.2293.488.38Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202388.9593.2393.1292.7588.95Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202492.6895.3692.8992.2792.68Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202591.5294.4688.9592.0691.52Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202693.8391.49Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20167022.2232.234770Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201776.9268.9474.8174.576.92Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201881.5279.480.281.981.52Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201984.778.580.582.484.7Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202086.7686.4984.683.4886.76Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202184.187.2383.3386.1484.1Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202293.679.4967.6786.7793.6Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202393.1390.5494.0694.4293.13Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202495.4992.6696.191.8195.49Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202594.2792.3796.3392.694.27Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202694.5493.57Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201611.67.4510.821511.6Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201718.5522.3923.0816.118.55Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201862.644646.362.162.64Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201971.260.870.669.871.2Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202072.6572.6171.3776.2872.65Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202174.1678.2776.2585.2574.16Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202285.0451.1641.7783.1785.04Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202387.1985.3486.6789.887.19Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202491.3488.0888.4690.7191.34Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202587.6588.9289.590.8687.65Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202691.4192.48Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201652.257.953.850.552.2Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201759.455.256.75459.4Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201854.7356.85653.854.73Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201959.456.65758.759.4Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202059.0958.0456.6560.1459.09Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202158.3357.6757.0759.4858.33Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202259.4357.2262.8758.6359.43Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202361.7959.4762.3162.361.79Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202464.5260.6260.4463.6664.52Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202566.6764.263.5562.5766.67Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202659.4365.22Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201990.5589.0588.3390.1190.55Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202093.8886.989.3488.2493.88Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202184.2192.9892.3590.4384.21Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202288.5786.6490.189.4688.57Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202390.2486.6188.2986.1290.24Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202492.3990.2995.5791.8292.39Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202592.4591.8990.9693.4492.45Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202691.1994.65Up is Good HV24aAbsolute gap in % of children who reach expected level of development at 2-2.5 years of age between highest and lowest York ward (4 yr aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NAUp is Bad HV24aAbsolute gap in % of children who reach expected level of development at 2-2.5 years of age between highest and lowest York ward (4 yr aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202213.1Up is Bad HV24aAbsolute gap in % of children who reach expected level of development at 2-2.5 years of age between highest and lowest York ward (4 yr aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202313.65Up is Bad HV24aAbsolute gap in % of children who reach expected level of development at 2-2.5 years of age between highest and lowest York ward (4 yr aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202410.53Up is Bad HV24aAbsolute gap in % of children who reach expected level of development at 2-2.5 years of age between highest and lowest York ward (4 yr aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20259.6Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2009/20109.63Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2010/201110.16Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2011/201211.52Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2012/201311.91Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2013/201411.69Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2014/201510.3Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2009/20104Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2010/20114.55Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2011/20124.97Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2012/20135.54Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2013/20145.65Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2014/20155.4Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201013.08Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201112.79Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201212.88Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201313.28Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201412.79Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201512.88Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201613.28Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201711.59Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201816.1Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201914.3Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202012.2Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20104.8Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20115.52Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20125.76Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.83Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20146.44Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20156.11Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20166.41Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20175.62Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20184.2Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NAUp is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20204.3Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201750.8Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201858.8Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201955.1Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202053.7Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202160.7Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202248.2Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202368.4Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202465.5Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201721.2Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201813.6Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201915.2Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202018.8Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202115Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202221Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202326.7Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202417.7Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201537.1Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201641.7Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201746.4Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201841.9Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201928.1Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202023.5Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202128.4Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202238.1Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202333.5Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202429.9Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017878Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018917Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20191172Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20201039Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021884Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022981Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023993Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20241141Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017445Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018398Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019509Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020518Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021496Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022579Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023491Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024496Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20172411Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20182912Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20193103Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20203057Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20212468Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20222913Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20232976Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20243401Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017978Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018968Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20191084Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20201118Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021942Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20221075Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20231001Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20241063Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017710Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018772Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019688Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020699Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021602Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022675Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023618Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024782Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017390Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018381Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019444Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020414Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021326Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022298Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023261Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024285Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20091412Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20101415Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20111464Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20121425Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20131619Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20141998Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20152020Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20162171Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20172263Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20182372Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20192536Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/2009447Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/2010462Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/2011444Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012462Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013595Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014659Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015636Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016661Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017691Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018724Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019713Up is Bad LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201431.423.632.630.831.4Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201531.634.232.234.331.6Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016403233.936.940Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201738.1936.8139.3237.2738.19Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201833.535.2532.8834.0833.5Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201931.0730.129.6533.0731.07Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202032.1132.3630.631.0332.11Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202127.131.8631.9629.3427.1Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202226.531.0130.428.4726.5Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202326.6322.0123.8427.0726.63Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202425.7529.4826.0524.2825.75Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202521.0321.7123.5127.0721.03Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202621.5225.61Up is Good LDHC08% of adults with a learning disability having a GP Health Check - (VoY CCG)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201433Up is Good LDHC08% of adults with a learning disability having a GP Health Check - (VoY CCG)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201551Up is Good LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018221.28200.51212.05251.27221.28Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019230.24244.64238.93241.73241.77241.86228.08224.1231.35219.82213.75152.59195.39247.14238.95271.32252.47Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020223228216245203Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202139060904Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022239162236118442Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023263.1233.39240.52237341.51Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024334.64374.14323.69283.25357.49Neutral NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20088.19Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20096.69Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20105.43Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20117.45Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20128.59Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20138.08Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20147.82Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20157.11Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20168.59Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20178.52Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189.28Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20199.54Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20207.6Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20228.9Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20237.8Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20248.8Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20259.93Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200816.51Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200917.05Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201014.07Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201114.71Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201216.39Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201316.34Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201415.44Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201515.09Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201615.14Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201716.13Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201817.41Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201915.07Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202022.1Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202218.87Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202318.7Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202419.2Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202519.33Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200822.61Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200917.06Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201014.41Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201117.59Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201222.17Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201321Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201422.43Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201519.14Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201622.37Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201720.83Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201824.07Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201923.65Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202021.4Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202222.7Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202319.9Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202422.8Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202523.18Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20117.22Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201214.55Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.08Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20144.4Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20157.8Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20167.5Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20177.6Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20188.1Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20199.5Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20209.5Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20226.8Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20235.66Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202410.92Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20258.2Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201121.38Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201216.36Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201311.17Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201412.8Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201510.6Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201611.6Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201711.6Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201814.8Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201914.1Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202011Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202213.9Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202311.63Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202415.44Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202511.38Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201118.35Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201218.79Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201315.22Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201412.6Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201512.9Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201615.5Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201718.6Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201815.9Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201919.8Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202024.2Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202224.4Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202324.68Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202422.84Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202518.58Up is Bad NGPP01Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupationsAnnualFinancial Year2012/20138.07Neutral NGPP01Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupationsAnnualFinancial Year2013/201413.66Neutral NGPP01Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupationsAnnualFinancial Year2014/201515.24Neutral NGPP01Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupationsAnnualFinancial Year2015/201613.19Neutral NGPP01Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupationsAnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.09Neutral NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2008/20092666.6Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2009/20102901Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2010/20112778.9Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/20123051.5Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/20132576.3Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/20142671.8Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/20152273.6Up is Bad PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2016/201760.4Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2017/201862.260.460.360.560.560.560.861.161.161.262.4626262.462.462.262.2Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2018/201960.562.363.363.163.163.464.264.464.463.26362.262.261.46160.560.5Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2019/202057.259.758.958.758.758.759.358.858.859.358.357.757.757.757.557.257.2Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2020/202153.255.454.153.453.453.753.853.853.853.953.253.153.152.252.153.253.2Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2021/202255.153.554.254.154.154.755.3555555.355.254.754.753.954.655.155.1Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2022/202356.15555.255.555.555.555.65656575756.256.255.155.256.156.1Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2023/202454.555.655.3555555.155.255.255.254.754.954.354.353.954.154.554.5Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2024/202556.654.254.354.854.854.654.554.755.656.756.856.556.356.6Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2025/202656.357Up is Good PHOF01% of physically active and inactive adults - active adults AnnualFinancial Year2012/201361.54Up is Good PHOF01% of physically active and inactive adults - active adults AnnualFinancial Year2013/201466.16Up is Good PHOF01% of physically active and inactive adults - active adults AnnualFinancial Year2014/201562.18Up is Good PHOF01% of physically active and inactive adults - active adults AnnualFinancial Year2015/201669.83Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201666.71Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201772.03Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201876.4Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201975.16Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202070.92Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202169.29Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202275.2Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202373.6Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202478.6Up is Good PHOF02% of active and inactive adults - inactive adults AnnualFinancial Year2012/201323.67Up is Bad PHOF02% of active and inactive adults - inactive adults AnnualFinancial Year2013/201421.09Up is Bad PHOF02% of active and inactive adults - inactive adults AnnualFinancial Year2014/201521.57Up is Bad PHOF02% of active and inactive adults - inactive adults AnnualFinancial Year2015/201617.54Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201621.1Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201718.3Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201813.8Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201915.8Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202017.6Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202121.2Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202215.4Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202316.3Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202410.8Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012461.73Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013594.09Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014657.5Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015633.84Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016658.5Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017687Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2008/200935.8Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2009/201027.7Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2010/20112727.1Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/201225.321.427.825.217.6Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201322.9628.513.432.219.2Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201421.5921.721.424.117.7Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201515.7110.520.913.322Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201620.4124.518.916.315.2Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201714.816.615.112.5Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201815.6Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201421.421.4Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201516.518.618.515.716.5Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201618.82019.620.418.8Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201716.816.815.814.816.8Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20181314.814.315.613Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201917.213.715.816.117.2Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202015.918.216.816.415.9Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/20219.915.112.812.49.9Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202212.19.910.910.212.1Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/2023Due April 2613.113.613.6Due April 26Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201113.9Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201214.1Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201313.8Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201410.7Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201511.2Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201612.3Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201711.1Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201810.4Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201911.6Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202010.4Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202110.3Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20228Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20238.1Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20246.2Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20254.74.15.944.8Up is Bad PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201465.13Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201566.05Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201665.99Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201766.16Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201864.83Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201965.97Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202066.34Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202165.8Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202266.15Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202364.08Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202462.68Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201463.91Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201565.17Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201665.15Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201765.29Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201864.44Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201964.82Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202065.23Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202164.67Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202265.15Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202363.61Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202462.01Up is Good PHOF11Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201420.933.339.6715.0720.93Up is Good PHOF11Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201538.1122.5326.6831.838.11Up is Good PHOF11Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201670.6748.435763.470.67Up is Good PHOF11Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201772.571.9172.272.272.5Up is Good PHOF11Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201872.772.572.672.772.7Up is Good PHOF11bCumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201441.5446.9145.7543.7741.54Up is Good PHOF11bCumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201539.3541.7541.6441.1239.35Up is Good PHOF11bCumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201637.5739.3238.6337.8137.57Up is Good PHOF11bCumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201737.437.4737.337.437.4Up is Good PHOF11bCumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201837.837.637.637.737.8Up is Good PHOF12Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20148.691.564.426.68.69Up is Good PHOF12Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201514.999.4111.1113.0714.99Up is Good PHOF12Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201626.5519.0422.0223.9726.55Up is Good PHOF12Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201727.126.9526.92727.1Up is Good PHOF12Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201827.527.327.327.427.5Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/200481.82Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/200582.04Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/200682.61Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/200782.98Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/200883.17Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/200982.94Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/201082.9Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/201182.71Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/201282.93Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/201383.04Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201483.37Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201583.37Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201683.4Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201783.4Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201883.42Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201983.27Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202083.55Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202183.49Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202283.62Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202383.37Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202483.61Up is Good PHOF162Smoking prevalence in adults (18-64) - socio-economic gap in current smokers (APS) RatioAnnualFinancial Year2016/20173.43Up is Bad PHOF162Smoking prevalence in adults (18-64) - socio-economic gap in current smokers (APS) RatioAnnualFinancial Year2017/20185.31Up is Bad PHOF162Smoking prevalence in adults (18-64) - socio-economic gap in current smokers (APS) RatioAnnualFinancial Year2018/20191.89Up is Bad PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20151771Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20161806Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20171810Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20181825Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20191902Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20201866Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20212032Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20221900Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20232010Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20241953Neutral PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20146.23Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20155.46Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20164.49Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20174.26Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20185.35Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20196.41Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20206.22Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20215.94Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20226.15Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20236.73Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20246.71Up is Bad PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2001/20022412Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2002/20032402Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2003/20042467Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2004/20052332Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2005/20062189Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20072343Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20082230Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20092259Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20102308Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20112300Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20122412Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20132375Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20142363Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20152323Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20162407Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20172510Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20182496Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20192624Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20202574Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20212683Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20222636Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20232740Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20242710Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20252703Neutral PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2013/201493.04Up is Good PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2014/201591.4Up is Good PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2015/201696.24Up is Good PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NAUp is Good PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018NAUp is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2013/201499.4Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2014/201599.2Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2015/201699.5Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NAUp is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2017/201899.7Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2018/201999.7Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2019/202098.9Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2020/202198.9Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2021/202299.9Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2022/202399.5Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2023/202499.5Up is Good PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201225.4Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201325.7Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201434.4Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.8Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201628.1Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201726.4Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201824.6Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201918.6Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202026.9Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202122.3Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202220.9Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202315.2Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202418.8Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201215.5Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201317Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201418.7Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201517.2Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201614.6Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.6Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201911.5Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202011.9Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202111.7Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20229.2Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20238.7Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20248.1Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20122.42Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20131.84Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20143.05Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20152.91Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20162.74Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20173.43Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20185.31Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20191.89Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20204.85Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20212.47Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20223.75Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20232.19Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20243.3Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201325.7Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201434.4Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.8Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201628.2Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201726.4Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201824.6Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201918.6Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2010/20112272Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2011/20122143Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2012/20132040Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2013/20142098Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2014/20152110Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2015/20162346Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2016/20172279Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2017/20182253Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2018/20192519Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2019/20202487Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2020/20212215Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2021/20222065Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2022/20232009Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2023/20242058Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2011/20125.04Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2012/20135.04Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2013/20145.04Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2014/20155.04Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2015/20165.04Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2016/20175.51Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2017/20185.51Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2018/20195.51Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2019/20205.51Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2021/20225.51Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20106.5Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20117.3Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20123.4Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.2Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20142.9Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20152.2Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20161.9Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20175.1Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20182.6Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20193.6Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20203.4Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20212.4Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20221.7Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20232Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Due May 26Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201199.3Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201299.5Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201395.7Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014100.4Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015111.8Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016104.7Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017121.1Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018133.2Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019121.1Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020101.5Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202182.3Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202287Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202389.5Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202482.8Up is Bad PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201182.72Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201282.91Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201382.44Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201481.42Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201580.63Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201680Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201779.9Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201879.6Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201978.9Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202079.69Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202179.92Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202264.76Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202371.75Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202472.55Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202575.5Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201177.38Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201276.93Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201375.97Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201474.75Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201574.69Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201673.69Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201773.8Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201873Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201971.7Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20148.71.62.92.22.1Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20157.31.71.721.9Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20169.82.3322.6Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20170.2000.10.1Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20180.40.20.10.10.1Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20192.30.10.60.70.9Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20202.40.70.60.70.5Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202100000Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20221.9000.61.3Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20234.20.60.81.21.7Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20243.61.40.70.60.8Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/20253.70.50.40.62.1Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/20261.3Up is Good PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2003/20047.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2004/20058.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2005/20069.2Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20078.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20087.8Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20099.4Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201010Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201110.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20129.3Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20138.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201411.3Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201511.1Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201614Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.9Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201813.5Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201911.9Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202011.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202113.3Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202213.4Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202312.9Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20249.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20258.7Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2001/200225.7Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2002/200319.5Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2003/200415.2Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2004/200519.6Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2005/200614.5Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20079.2Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200817.3Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200934.5Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201019.1Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201123.5Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201214.5Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201315.6Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201414.7Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201516.8Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201626.2Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201731Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201831.9Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201915.3Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020-4.7Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202145.3Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20228Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Feb 26Up is Bad PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/200476.84Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/200577.28Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/200677.26Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/200777.79Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/200878.31Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/200978.97Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/201079.15Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/201179.36Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/201279.23Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/201379.47Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201479.34Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201580.05Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201680.2Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201780.34Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201880.12Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201980.04Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202080.11Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202179.82Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202279.81Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202379.47Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202479.77Up is Good PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20146.65Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20155.7Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20167.25Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20178.15Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189.34Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20198.78Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20208.62Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20218.84Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20229.84Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202310.57Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202410.08Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2010/201113.5Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201214.1Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201314.3Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201415.9Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201513.1Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20161316.920.821.313Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201716.1114.8614.3514.6616.1116.11Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201815.1915.1515.515.6415.6415.6515.4415.6515.6515.915.9415.4915.4915.5115.2115.1915.19Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201913.9614.9815.22151515.114.8314.5814.5814.614.2714.1914.1914.5214.5513.9613.96Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202014.1513.914.0313.9413.9413.9214.3114.3414.3414.2714.7914.5214.5214.0514.0214.1514.15Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/202112.7614.1414.2414.2514.2513.9213.8113.8513.8513.7213.8113.3813.3813.0912.9112.7612.76Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202213.1512.7212.4112.1612.1612.4112.3312.5212.5213.0212.9312.8512.8512.912.9913.1513.15Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/202313.112.913.513.713.713.513.814.614.614.213.413.313.313.31313.113.1Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/202414.913.313.513.713.713.514.414.614.615.515.715.615.615.614.614.914.9Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/202514.914.914.615151514.614.714.714.914.614.414.414.514.314.914.9Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/20261515.114.914.914.914.914.514.514.714.714.414.4Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2011/201264Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2012/201363Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2013/201463Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2014/201563.2Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2015/201669.3Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2016/201768.5Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2017/201863.9Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2018/201956.4Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2019/202058Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2020/202156.6Up is Bad PHOF44% of adults classified as overweight or obeseAnnualFinancial Year2014/201556.88Up is Bad PHOF44% of adults classified as overweight or obeseAnnualFinancial Year2015/201656.4Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201659.3Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201758.9Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201856.5Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201957.2Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202062.2Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202163.6Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202259.5Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202363.3Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202460.1Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201317.01Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201418.72Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201517.24Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201614.63Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.6Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201911.5Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2003/2004170.8Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2004/2005162.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2005/2006160.9Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2006/2007152.8Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2007/2008147.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2008/2009136.8Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2009/2010131.7Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2010/2011132.1Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012137.4Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013141Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014147.1Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015139.2Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016135.3Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017126.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018130.5Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019132.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020135.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021144.4Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022153.2Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023158.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024152.4Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2003/2004130.6Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2004/2005119.3Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2005/2006109.1Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2006/200799.4Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200893.7Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200985.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201078.3Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201177Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201275.5Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201372.1Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201473.3Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201569.4Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201667.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201765.1Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201864.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201967.5Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202065.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202166.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202265Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202368.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202465.9Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/2004186.2Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/2005170.3Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/2006157.4Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/2007147.5Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/2008138.8Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/2009127.2Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/2010117.8Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/2011116.6Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012119.3Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013114.1Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014115.4Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015101.6Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201698Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201792.8Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201894.5Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201996Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202091.7Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202192.5Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202291.9Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023102.3Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202496.7Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2003/2004157.8Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2004/2005152.3Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2005/2006151.5Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2006/2007144.8Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2007/2008146.3Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/2009141.3Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/2010142Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/2011138.5Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012146.3Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013149.5Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014149.8Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015139.9Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016130.4Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017130.5Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018132.9Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019133.9Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020132Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021128.2Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022134Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023131Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024130.9Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/2004190Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/2005180.4Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/2006188.2Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/2007175.6Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/2008170Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/2009154.9Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/2010154.8Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/2011152.5Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012160.1Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013163.6Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014170.8Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015162.7Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016154Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017145.5Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018147.8Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019142.8Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020146.4Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021141.7Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022152.6Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023144.7Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024141.3Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2003/200411.3Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2004/200514.5Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2005/200613.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2006/200715.3Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200815.7Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200914.5Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201013.2Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201111.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201213.4Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201315.1Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201413.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201513.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201615.2Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201716.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201816.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201914.9Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202013.9Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202114.4Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202214.3Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202318.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202419.5Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/200413.5Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/200516.1Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/200618Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/200720.7Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/200822.7Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/200920.3Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/201018.6Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/201115Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/201215.4Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/201316.7Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201416.1Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201516.4Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201618.4Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201720.2Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201823.2Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201920.9Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202018.5Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202116.4Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202215.7Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202322.1Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202425.5Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2003/200432.8Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2004/200530.6Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2005/200630.7Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2006/200727Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200826.2Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200926.1Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201029.2Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201132.2Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201233.2Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201331.9Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201432.6Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201531.1Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201630.8Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201728.1Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201829.1Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201933.2Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202033.8Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202131Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202223.8Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202323.5Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202425.6Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/200442.7Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/200536.2Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/200635.7Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/200735.5Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/200833.5Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/200933.9Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/201035.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/201136.6Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/201236.8Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/201335.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201437.2Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201535.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201632Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201729.9Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201831Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201937.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202035.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202134.3Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202225.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202326.8Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202428.7Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2003/20047.1Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2004/20057.8Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2005/20067.5Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20078.2Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20089Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200911.6Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201011.8Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201110.9Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20128.3Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.2Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20145.5Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20154.2Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20165.8Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20175.9Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20186.7Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20198.4Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20209Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20219.9Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20226.9Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20239.2Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202411.2Up is Bad PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201476.45.16.27Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20155.26.266.15.2Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20165.55.56.15.95.5Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20179.396.077.978.059.39Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20186.39.398.797.756.3Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20194.75.525.294.74.7Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20206.344.574.555.166.34Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/20213.46.55.334.963.4Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20224.383.864.033.594.38Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20235.423.825.535.355.42Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20244.45.454.235.374.4Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/20252.994.24.093.382.99Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/20263.293.34Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201434.630.931.130.534.6Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201540.136.535.638.840.1Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201631.13834.833.331.1Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201738.0832.5137.9337.8938.08Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201832.1136.9333.9129.9632.11Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201929.230.3326.6131.529.2Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202027.7128.7132.4931.8427.71Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202129.329.327.6728.9729.3Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202226.527.6129.728.7326.5Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20232024.7821.419.9220Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202419.5221.9922.2223.319.52Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202517.1416.517.715.8417.14Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202618.7223.59Up is Good PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2011/201243.5Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2012/201338.5Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2013/201442.3Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2014/201544.4Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2015/201652.9Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2016/201746.7Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2017/201847.1Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2018/201950Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2019/202058.3Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2020/202180Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2021/202283.3Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023100Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2023/202450Up is Bad PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201420.93.36.35.45.9Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201519.64.14.15.16.3Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201628.15.98.66.47.3Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20170.80.20.30.10.2Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20180.40.20.10.10.1Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201925.39.23.66.36.2Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202017.53.72.74.76.4Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202100000Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20221.9000.61.3Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20235.30.71.21.42Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20244.41.810.80.8Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/20254.50.70.50.82.5Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/20261.3Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201441.546.945.140.235.8Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201537.342.741.138.430.4Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201634.939.134.730.535.4Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201721.45.9010041.9Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018100100100100100Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20199.21.615.711.714.1Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202013.919.32114.87.1Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202100000Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202210000100100Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202379.87964.285.985Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202481.481708097Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202581.681807784Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202695Up is Good PHYS05% of Adults (aged 16+) who have taken part in sport and physical activity at least twice in the last 28 daysAnnualFinancial Year2016/201784.882.784.8Up is Good PHYS05% of Adults (aged 16+) who have taken part in sport and physical activity at least twice in the last 28 daysAnnualFinancial Year2017/201884.0185.2Up is Good PHYS05% of Adults (aged 16+) who have taken part in sport and physical activity at least twice in the last 28 daysAnnualFinancial Year2018/201987.78487.7Up is Good PHYS05% of Adults (aged 16+) who have taken part in sport and physical activity at least twice in the last 28 daysAnnualFinancial Year2019/202084.1Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201770.267.971.01Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201870.269.4Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201974.973.1Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202067.172.77Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20216366.763Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202266.566.566.5Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202370.470.4Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202469.869.8Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202576.576.5Up is Good POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2013/20142623Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2014/20152680Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2015/20162717Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2016/20172788Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2017/20182788Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2018/20192779Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2019/20202834Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2020/20212927Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2021/20222954Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2022/20233004Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2023/20243092Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2024/20253129Up is Bad PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/201296Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201395Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201493Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201593Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20169494949494Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201794.2594949495Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201893.892.791.294.994.2Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20199396949489Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20209598969595Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202189.2NC9397.789.2Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20228692858686Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202389.5939190.178.5Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20249392929493Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202590909189.990Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/2026899190Up is Good PP07% of businesses that were compliant with legislation concerning the illegal use and sale of alcohol and tobaccoAnnualFinancial Year2011/201291Up is Good PP07% of businesses that were compliant with legislation concerning the illegal use and sale of alcohol and tobaccoAnnualFinancial Year2012/201398Up is Good PP07% of businesses that were compliant with legislation concerning the illegal use and sale of alcohol and tobaccoAnnualFinancial Year2013/201475Up is Good PP07% of businesses that were compliant with legislation concerning the illegal use and sale of alcohol and tobaccoAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015100Up is Good PP07% of businesses that were compliant with legislation concerning the illegal use and sale of alcohol and tobaccoAnnualFinancial Year2015/201663.2Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2011/201298Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2012/201399Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2013/20149998999999999998999998999997989798Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2014/201598979799989899989899989798989910099Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2015/20169898999998Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2016/20179897949796999896989899999898989998Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2017/201898100999899999997989998989898949696Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019989397979698989997999810099991009799Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2019/20209910099100100100981009910099989998989998Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021601001001271174046347587928583898686Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2021/20228784828283878586868393908791949092Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2022/20239385919490899095919798999893959695Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2023/202498989697979896989799999999969810098Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2024/202597949595959897979797971009895969896Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2025/20269596979696979897Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2011/2012100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2012/201399Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2013/2014100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017100100100NA100100NA100100NANANANA100NANA100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2023/2024100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2024/2025100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2025/2026100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2011/2012100Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2012/201397Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2013/20149392929895979592959696889583949793Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2014/20159389939693969495949696859292939393Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2015/20169091929383Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2016/20178567828076998991939185798566909283Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2017/20188384948788949195939285788567827274Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2018/20198673807275818779828897909290969493Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2019/20208987879489928991918990858890909190Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2020/20218276778880899183888583748187838386Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2021/20227278847980797355696271746969856974Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2022/20234735594546425140444468475326575345Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2023/20244754595757626162625242444624303730Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2024/20256938293935443694589295879192939593Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2025/20268591868794949494Up is Good PVP01People supported through personal budgets or direct payments receiving community-based services (%) (ADASS Survey definition)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201484.13Up is Good PVP01People supported through personal budgets or direct payments receiving community-based services (%) (ADASS Survey definition)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201591.2987.5387.9287.9291.1491.1488.0989.3388.5788.5789.2190.2591.2991.29Up is Good PVP01People supported through personal budgets or direct payments receiving community-based services (%) (ADASS Survey definition)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201693.8892.292.592.8192.593.1293.3293.5693.3394.2894.294.4994.3295.0795.3195.6695.35Up is Good PVP01People supported through personal budgets or direct payments receiving community-based services (%) (ADASS Survey definition)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NC91.3388.8691.8990.6988.3389.7286.9988.3589.68NCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Good PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/20152413120197022162058212019603016753Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201626028182874192130701316255423192062Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201724834211570231827681318225320221557Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20182461719256120272370172037741518841Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20192523535209024191760251919632181039Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20202012227196830211162121513401213631Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/20211721151127131517451115275317141647Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202221718192057242013571223175212182151Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/202321624251766222317621416144410112344Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/20242052314215816211855721134116142151Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/202524815202459212927771515154532171867Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/202626242373152113491912940Up is Bad PVP04Total number of Acute delayed discharges (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/20151204813251121427111912421051126Up is Bad PVP04Total number of Acute delayed discharges (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016189615163715172153620184425121855Up is Bad PVP04Total number of Acute delayed discharges (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017124161573858102310137301181433Up is Bad PVP04Total number of Acute delayed discharges (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018NA67922316726NANANANANANANANAUp is Bad PVP05Total number of reimbursable CYC delays (attributable to CYC) (YDH Only)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015115641222131111351516134482414Up is Bad PVP05Total number of reimbursable CYC delays (attributable to CYC) (YDH Only)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20161373911231291435111310342481345Up is Bad PVP05Total number of reimbursable CYC delays (attributable to CYC) (YDH Only)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20178915121138638175771943815Up is Bad PVP05Total number of reimbursable CYC delays (attributable to CYC) (YDH Only)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018NA62816115622NANANANANANANANAUp is Bad PVP06Reablement - assessments to be completed within 6 weeks of referralMonthlyFinancial Year2014/201526.8454.5539.292037.9563.6453.3358.4929.4126.6746.1534.0816.671053.8526.84Up is Good PVP06Reablement - assessments to be completed within 6 weeks of referralMonthlyFinancial Year2015/201621.6327.2730.7733.3330.4618.1833.332525.5255.8812.514.461533.33016.11Up is Good PVP06Reablement - assessments to be completed within 6 weeks of referralMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NC16.67012.59.72037.5101633.33NCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Good PVP07OT/OTA assessments - to be completed within 28 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2014/201595.8798.2897.6297.4497.7897.6499.7698.798.5398.4696.6797.8993.7596.4897.3795.87Up is Good PVP07OT/OTA assessments - to be completed within 28 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2015/201696.9797.1298.1195.897.0197.995.997.1296.9797.6496.9296.196.8997.4897.2296.3297.01Up is Good PVP07OT/OTA assessments - to be completed within 28 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NC97.8497.0690.5795.1595.6291.7294.7894.0492.86NCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Good PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/20131784Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/20141753Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201514871810183018301806180613351448150115011508102714871487Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201617621764178317761774175617531765175817361741175417441751179717691772Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201718821945187918841902190019241899190718811896186718811850184018231837Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201818811737171317171856171216981719185616881667162918601639162615771881Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201916651887188418821884188118691854186818401737169817581699166116351665Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202016061737171317171719171216981719172516881667162916471639162615771606Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/202116871680173517731773181418061830183018531853182118211773175116871687Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202217281680Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/20132822Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/20142570Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201526432550252025202582258227082688266826682690313526432643Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201624352444242224372434242824232415242224332427243024302451243924712454Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017931948958898935903906934914916922917918921987967958Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018857929922926904932962955917961945956892949951959857Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20191037912930924922933936920929935100310209861022104710421037Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020958929922926927932962955955961945956955949951959958Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021925908899900900873919933933922935946946931925925925Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022937941Neutral PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2013/20141712.73Up is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2014/20151344.96Up is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2015/20161434.68Up is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018NCUp is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024150234772711401502Up is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2024/20252712483107218742712Up is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2025/2026511Up is Good PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201514Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016224648Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017161124101221361304Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018222316211424281214Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019215229102332272002Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20202642410232712032406Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021203227033630251102Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/20223122610423921253137Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023271258141604041179Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/2024111102121422150000Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/2025182046222600111045Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/2026223732276017Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015447226324136687013843848910655715505251646417264210891Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201662003575254341316470506495147152247953515367374686721877Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201735164793502431072224194304722239331293863231264364859Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018383026725726578923937938410023524253971174227287351865Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201962865584674801505335636487145854549162816645505355741659Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020NC727740634210165752056617434823684631313535375NCNCUp is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015286117631130479137831527496742519014776221510323341Up is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016202243128119290149121111381210298292800154193204551Up is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20172860270253324784200205270675272235297804151149237537Up is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018200418616711046313911222447519818923462119814899445Up is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201918261991771995758592211388178177119474159129101389Up is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020NC1601471985059384117294551987161172121NCNCUp is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad PVP28Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (TEWV only)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20173822296740750354853640514894525153741341196106187489Up is Bad PVP28Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (TEWV only)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20182156295211116622911131313357360247380310280229819Up is Bad PVP28Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (TEWV only)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20192708233274326833195243261699290188170648171130227528Up is Bad PVP28Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (TEWV only)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020NC212186119517273138213183173121477124193NCNCUp is Bad PVP28Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (TEWV only)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/20136.5Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/20146.5Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/20157.8Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20165.76.46.36.36.36.26.1665.75.65.55.55.45.55.75.7Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20177.36.26.56.66.66.76.97.17.17.27.47.47.67.67.57.37.3Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20187.176.96.86.86.86.87776.66.96.97.17.17.17.1Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20197.727.37.2776.97.17.37.37.47.67.57.57.57.677.727.72Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20207.017.937.897.847.847.877.847.757.757.757.647.627.627.367.067.017.01Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/20214.886.916.836.716.716.576.76.716.716.386.155.755.755.495.284.884.88Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202210.535.065.595.935.936.266.246.496.496.877.427.767.768.789.3510.5310.53Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/20239.3510.4510.4510.4910.4910.6410.710.7210.7210.710.6710.8310.8310.159.899.359.35Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/20249.419.249.279.369.369.249.319.359.359.579.489.639.639.649.749.419.41Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/20258.839.679.79.739.739.669.759.619.619.229.058.758.758.748.758.838.83Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/20268.588.388.278.278.368.348.478.478.648.65Up is Bad TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/2014NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201765.4664NC65.46NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201864.8170.51NC64.81NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201972.5266.11NC72.52NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202074.7471.52NC74.74NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202268.7572NC68.75NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202364.6868.0564.68Up is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202472.2462.6372.24Up is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202567.9463.4267.94Up is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202665.09Up is Good TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/2014NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201726.127.3NC26.1NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201827.2523.06NC27.25NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201919.425.89NC19.4NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202017.1121.41NC17.11NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202220.9119NC20.91NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202328.8322.4128.83Up is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202417.6126.0517.61Up is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202524.4328.4224.43Up is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202620.21Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2014/201511739992492221430927309274220059578750917509184624941939974299742104929112241117399117399Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2015/20164161228114692739273957401106115330153302027424597280462804633717362544161241612Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2016/201731188221548787662766295811549418670186702210824550264452644528009288453118831188Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2017/2018125339982488384938494607610672517251851388959575957510510113561263312533Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2018/201914036535695128512852255358047454745625072707950795011386133191403614036Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2019/2020145811195252030813081513962777017701776458797104281042811193124661458114581Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2020/20215689910860162862070520705234912596528940289403413939432436564365648360521365688956899Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2021/202229996164141557141714189691003512708127081474017842216552165524830275862999629996Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2022/202332573270766051002510025121341395816259162591908121461239702397028229302473257332573Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2023/202427845292846356277627787661137313821138211626217486209572095724351259992784527845Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2024/20251953116582135588058808018912411051110511212014147150781507816595174071953119531Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2025/2026280145996265626574478603102541025411236139221527115271Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2014/20151856352283849663677386773888554102823121670121670113647144486155684155684160620173757185635185635Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2015/20161584148581190823654236543427946253636816368183477102686115041115041134132147726158414158414Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2016/20171709291833028630413304133053539737268976189761102157114703123092123092141253150071170929170929Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2017/2018148987107742123641341413415372158479766477664786541103492112396112396123488139862148987148987Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2018/20191911641511228351418184181854503657969066790667108156125793144187144187147926175207191164191164Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2019/20201728831119625317388433884366558740548187981879101300119484132407132407146488162973172883172883Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2020/20212366391165130062434244342455110741869750897508120650149803168685168685177417203999236639236639Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2021/20222317622216045314594885948888817102763119112119112132206150855183705183705200008217181231762231762Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2022/20232925162315246313625516255186820111087135445135445158889184121207186207186254658274099292516292516Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2023/202431905723935527208790387903119514146989151551151551175363208150229415229415265840303421319057319057Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2024/202519949541460734609713797137133604139614146289146289154619166754173669173669182712191750199495199495Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2025/2026168702428134793347935344867423800758007586077106118119579119579Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2014/2015398753083489580588058159292156923984239842850027035285132851331230336873987539875Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2015/201626745113728156991699110171896111916119161453816821181971819723123239022674526745Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2016/2017239576893115081208412084126931297615735157351698117711196491964921625229892395723957Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2017/201818557807797501104411044115241330014659146591538316047163421634217597179961855718557Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2018/20191883210199112391242412424143501409815790157901666817844181321813217796177961883218832Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2019/202089855456632064266426752974047435743581578543860786079094901989858985Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2020/2021109984273446451885188579850526297629764377756883588351035599991099810998Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2021/202210738233822982298229828022745319731973197354438843884492953541073810738Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2022/202318910356453625889588957105150547854781250867077092709211596115091891018910Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2023/202474064114287432853285304024212530253045822867582558256164629274067406Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2024/2025120102487630932143214426942694972497269278565628362836510111331201012010Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2025/202653245324101771017774547584744374438423874085798579Up is Bad YCC013YFAS Number of Food vouchers - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015747243636515970707373747474747474Neutral YCC013YFAS Number of Food vouchers - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNeutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2014/20153180300683998998132816471988198822302432260526052803299231803180Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2015/20161325901552552552932935825827208519589581091119713251325Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2016/20171256461652842843804966156157298269249241043111212561256Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2017/2018115978194279279376495589589681764863863974107411591159Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2018/201913281101732492493634705715717218539429421064120013281328Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2019/202092430176270270420478535535598734845845906924924924Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2020/202117072524015355356337518758759381112124612461444155617071707Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2021/202213181092082842844094725925926348099429421063116413181318Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2022/20231507112248364364467574626626813967108910891300133015071507Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2023/20241262631722912913884955845846998139319311081116612621262Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2024/2025105311320227427437944851751762572279679688793810531053Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2025/202689151260260325422487487529669763763Neutral YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201612.0511.1511.5911.5911.8312.1612.1611.8912.0412.0411.912.1312.0512.05Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201711.2612.0711.8612.1312.1312.0811.9712.0112.0111.9212.0311.511.511.6311.4911.2611.26Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018NC11.2410.9710.7410.7411.18NC11.2311.2310.9610.82NCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201911.9810.911.4512.2511.98Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202010.5811.2610.4410.310.58Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202110.7611.4811.9911.3910.76Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20228.599.928.598.298.59Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20238.298.048.799.218.29Up is Bad APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20140Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCNeutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20160.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20190.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20200.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20210.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20220.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCNeutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024N/CNeutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NCNeutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018NCNCNeutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201927.2420.326.431.7327.0929.7625.4128.7428.0225.2328.236.7830.2928.9120.6119.5423.62Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202025.8622.9122.6220.2822.0420.1522.526.8823.1124.7933.5330.1929.9831.6122.1932.3429.08Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/202131.5933.6234.2535.7234.6629.9230.6935.1332.132.0235.937.0434.9230.523.8223.5526.12Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202223.3820.1527.0516.2620.9815.923.2120.6219.7326.4825.9530.4827.4628.6724.5224.525.64Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/202317.4426.2816.6813.7518.7615.7517.9712.3315.4610.5417.0417.6314.8219.1522.4418.8620.02Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/202417.9816.0717.1320.6818.1818.7718.7315.9917.7522.0615.8221.5419.519.7115.0814.316.49Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/202513.2613.098.3313.1411.4911.3512.314.2312.5114.9116.189.5513.4616.8312.420.6216.14Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/202619.32NANANANANANANANANANANANeutral ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018NCUp is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20195.724.94.84.14.15.175.124.944.9454.864.524.524.985.315.725.72Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20204.875.15.065.25.25.165.144.844.844.674.43.853.853.823.944.874.87Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/20215.365.315.965.695.695.876.457.147.147.77.457.937.937.125.975.365.36Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/20228.265.675.486.076.075.396.135.755.756.86.576.966.967.877.848.268.26Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/202311.997.817.747.457.457.38.28.678.679.329.8510.5310.5311.4411.1111.9911.99Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/202411.2311.5311.612.2212.2212.0411.1210.6410.6411.0811.3311.6811.6811.3911.5611.2311.23Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/202510.0511.2610.9810.8510.8510.7510.6510.0810.0810.439.99.659.6510.039.3810.0510.05Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/20269.979.169.519.519.389.519.059.059.39.9610.710.7Up is Good ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202021232149213421352135216621962209220921872170216921692169214321232123Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/202121582154216122092209219922262258225822502253222222222154214721582158Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202220372153217621792179216421322123212321112106208420842068206320372037Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/202320902034205720712071207620962114211420902092206820682064207320902090Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/202420652070209020822082209720892088208820912087207820782052206320652065Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/202521162052207620892089204920702081208120952102209920992077210421162116Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/2026210021012097209721132127211721172145212921402140Neutral ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201875Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201979Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202076Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202180Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202279Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202378Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202481Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201868Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201973Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202072Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202173Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202271Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202377Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202476Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2011/201273.1Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2012/201363.2Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2013/201482.6Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2014/201591.8Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2015/201682.681.881.88281.981.981.781.781.881.681.581.381.581.681.684.282.47Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2016/201782.2684.184.384.584.384.6884.298484.3284.1681.4481.7282.4479.3379.7680.6579.91Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2017/20188280.1879.779.779.8679.5979.4179.0179.3378.9678.4177.5378.2977.3177.2977.0777.22Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2018/201981.477.1277.1276.2376.8276.3176.3876.3876.3676.1376.2876.0576.1574.9374.9374.9374.93Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2019/202081.8Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2020/202184.1NAUp is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2021/202284.8Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2022/202384.4Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2023/202485.8Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201253.9Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201363.9Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201468.7Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201555.1Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201628.5Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201739.2120.2220.5321.2620.6937.5538.0538.9738.1944.6746.4946.2245.8350.4652.6453.2452.14Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20186948475249586770577981816582828369Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20198483838483868685858584838483838284Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20208084828283818180828080808179787780Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/20217378777677757372757371717471716873Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/20224653535152484745474544444442414141Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/20233440393638373535373535343632312535Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/20243024302830242427232222252120Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2013/201443Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2014/201546.6Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2015/201645.8Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2016/201749.5Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2017/201844.5Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2018/201943.4Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2019/202045.5Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2020/202135.4Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2021/202239.7Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2022/202341.3Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2023/202450.2Up is Good ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20127Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20137.7Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201411.5Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20159.9Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201611.32.282.283.053.053.816.097.617.618.379.910.6610.6613.714.4616.7516.75Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201711.180.750.752.252.25333.763.765.266.018.268.269.0111.2711.2711.27Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201815.71.493.734.474.475.966.717.457.458.9511.9313.4213.4214.1615.6516.416.4Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201910.43.735.226.716.717.457.458.958.9511.1812.6714.1614.1615.6515.6515.6515.65Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202019.22.984.477.457.458.9511.1812.6712.6713.4214.9114.9114.9116.419.3819.3819.38Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202113.32.243.735.225.225.227.459.699.6911.9311.9313.4213.4214.1614.9114.9114.91Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202222.1Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202316.4Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20248.3Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201611.422.2800.763.050.762.281.524.570.761.520.763.053.050.762.286.09Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201711.270.7501.52.250.7500.751.51.50.752.254.50.752.2503Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201815.71.492.240.754.481.490.750.752.981.492.981.495.960.751.490.752.99Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201910.43.731.491.496.710.7501.492.242.241.491.495.221.49001.49Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020NC2.981.492.987.451.492.241.495.220.751.4902.241.492.9804.47Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NC2.241.491.495.2202.242.244.472.2401.493.730.750.7501.49Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/20221.491.494.477.452.241.491.495.22Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012608.4Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013617.7Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014767.5Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015630.8Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016683.176.8126.17202.97202.97255.08312.68394.96394.96430.62474.51543.08543.08606.16658.27713.13713.13Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017647.891.8148.5189189251.1299.7372.6372.6407.7456.3515.7515.7569.7629.1669.6669.6Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018649.445.3295.97162.62162.62215.94287.92349.23349.23394.55447.87546.51546.51586.49634.48655.81655.81Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019668.693.31186.61239.93239.93303.91354.56399.88399.88466.53517.18567.83567.83623.82645.14671.8671.8Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020539.658.65130.63181.28181.28261.26317.24346.57346.57378.56418.54453.2453.2495.85530.51546.51546.51Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021347.329.3242.6571.9871.98106.64146.62191.94191.94221.27261.26333.24333.24378.56415.88458.53458.53Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022499Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023479.5Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024524.2Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016693.9376.849.3776.8202.9752.1157.682.28191.9935.6643.8868.57148.1163.0852.1154.86170.05Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017656.191.856.740.518962.148.672.9183.635.148.659.4143.15459.440.5153.9Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018649.445.3250.6566.65162.6253.3271.9861.32186.6245.3253.3298.64197.2839.9947.9921.33109.31Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019668.693.3193.3153.32239.9363.9850.6545.32159.9566.6550.6550.65167.9555.9821.3326.66103.97Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020NC58.6571.9850.65181.2879.9855.9829.32165.2831.9939.9934.66106.6431.9934.661682.64Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NC29.3213.3329.3271.9834.6639.9945.32119.9629.3239.9971.98141.2945.3237.3242.65125.3Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202242.6550.6547.99141.2950.6539.9916106.64Up is Bad ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012100Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2012/201369.8Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2013/201480.9Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2014/201581.5Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2015/201675.7Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2016/201779.25Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2017/201892.5Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2018/201983Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2019/202080.6Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2020/202184.8Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2021/202288.2Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2022/202383.6Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2023/202491.2Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2011/20120.4Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2012/20130.7Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2013/20141.1Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2014/20150.9Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2015/20162.2Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.78Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.8Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2018/20190.7Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2019/20200.5Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2020/20210.5Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2021/20220.5Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2022/20231.1Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2023/20241.9Up is Good ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201217.3Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201318.2Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201417.6Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201511.69.1511.9813.0113.0112.3512.5613.0113.0113.1613.5713.1513.1512.8712.1411.8911.89Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201613.26.559.5310.7310.7310.8811.3211.8211.8211.4112.0712.3212.3213.2913.3113.3613.36Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201716.8518.2216.1617.6317.6317.6317.8718.0218.0218.1318.5918.0218.0217.2216.7216.8516.85Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201813.514.513.412.112.111.411.411.911.912.112.413.113.113.313.413.513.5Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201917.319.818.819.219.217.417.617.717.71817.817.717.717.617.617.517.5Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202015.421.821.120.320.318.717.517.317.316.71615.615.615.715.6Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201613.366.5512.5113.1110.7211.3213.1114.312.918.9416.6814.313.3122.0511.3216.0916.49Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201716.8518.2214.120.5717.6317.6318.8118.8118.4118.8121.7413.5218.029.9911.7518.2213.32Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201813.514.512.39.612.19.111.414.611.713.214.518.715.514.915.113.914.6Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201917.319.817.82019.211.818.318.616.219.416.617.217.716.716.91716.7Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202021.820.518.520.314.212.71614.313.510.912.712.416.115.2Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/20123.2Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201310.7Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201411.1Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/20156.34.273.965.085.085.795.986.26.26.627.097.257.257.086.66.356.35Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20166.92.383.874.774.775.365.365.865.865.966.186.166.166.976.836.956.95Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20177.499.48.239.999.999.999.649.319.318.99.048.758.758.117.647.497.49Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20186.45.85.14.64.64.64.55.25.25.666.56.56.56.56.46.4Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20196.67.37.67.97.96.97.27.47.47.57.57.27.276.86.66.6Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20204.95.35.45.95.95.85.65.65.65.55.15555Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20166.952.385.366.554.767.155.368.346.956.557.755.966.7514.35.368.349.33Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20177.499.47.0513.529.999.998.237.648.626.469.996.467.632.352.945.883.72Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20186.45.84.43.74.64.64.38.45.87.98.810.396.86.44.86Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20196.67.388.47.94.18.28.678.17.456.84.65.64.24.8Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20205.35.47.15.95.54.95.75.44.52.643.75.34.8Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2011/201264Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2012/201365.8Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2013/201467.4Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2014/201567.1Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2015/201664Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2016/201762.4Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2017/201862.9Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2018/201963.8Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2019/202068.1Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2020/202172.3Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2021/202265.1Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2022/202366.5Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2023/202465.1Up is Good BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2010/20110Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2011/201227Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2012/201336Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2013/201415Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2014/20153Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2015/20160000Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017298Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018546Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019713Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020832Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021685Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022367Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023119Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024140Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025144144Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201144Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201237.04Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201334.42Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201429.51Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.07Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201628.02Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201728.7Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201827.61Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201927.6Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202027.6Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202121.5NANANAUp is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202225.1NAUp is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202324.1Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202423.4Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202518.2Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201149.98Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201243.61Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201340.61Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201434.36Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201535.08Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201630.81Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201732.6Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201829.94Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201929.7Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202029.9Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202121.9NANANAUp is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202225.5NAUp is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202324.4Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202421.8Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202520.4Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201152.07Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201246.36Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201343.28Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201437.79Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201538.18Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201635.02Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201736Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201833.14Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201933.7Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202033.3Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202125.8NANANAUp is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202228.7NAUp is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202327.9Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202425.8Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202522.3Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201147.51Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201237.34Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201335.37Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201431.05Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.71Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201628.91Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201729.9Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201827.33Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201927.3Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202027.3Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202120.7NANANAUp is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202222.8NAUp is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202321.7Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202420.1Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202519.5Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201144.57Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201242.84Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201339.6Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201435.67Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201534.34Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201631.44Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201732.4Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201829.87Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201929.6Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202029.8Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202122.5NANANAUp is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202225NAUp is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202323.8Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202422.2Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202520Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201142.88Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201236.18Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201333.19Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201428.03Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201530.09Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201628.49Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201727.4Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201826.93Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201925.4Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202025.9Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202119NANANAUp is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202219.2NAUp is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202319.2Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202419.5Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202518Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201151.33Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201249.48Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201342.98Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201438.38Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201540.47Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201635.16Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201735.8Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201833.26Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201934.2Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202033.8Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202128.5NANANAUp is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202232.7NAUp is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202333Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202429.8Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202523.2Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201174.86Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201262.32Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201352.43Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201445.49Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201549.67Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201643.87Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201745.2Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201842.79Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201946.1Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202046.5Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202136.7NANANAUp is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202239.1NAUp is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202340.6Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202434.4Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202525.5Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201146.63Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201241.6Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201339.91Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201436.08Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201537.6Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201631.85Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201734.7Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201831.72Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201931.8Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202031.4Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202124.4NANANAUp is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202229.2NAUp is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202328.45Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202427Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202520.9Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201166.14Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201257.71Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201350.96Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201440.83Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201542Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201637.51Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201736.9Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201836.35Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201935.6Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202037.4Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202127.2NANANAUp is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202232.8NAUp is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202330.62Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202425.7Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202524.8Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201173.37Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201262.49Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201354.23Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201451.59Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201549.18Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201646.92Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201747.7Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201845.86Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201946.3Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202045.5Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202135NANANAUp is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202243.5NAUp is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202341.33Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202437.1Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202532.4Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201156.68Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201248.06Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201345.51Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201439.97Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201545.22Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201637.68Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201737.5Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201836.24Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201936.1Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202037.8Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202129.2NANANAUp is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202232.9NAUp is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202330.39Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202428.8Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202525.4Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201155.63Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201262.64Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201356.46Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201447.45Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201546.97Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201644.59Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201742.7Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201842.78Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201941.8Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202038.9Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202132.5NANANAUp is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202233.7NAUp is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202333.77Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202430.9Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202528.1Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201155.76Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201246.34Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201343.16Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201436.29Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201539.46Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201636.83Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201735.5Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201835.25Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201932.7Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202033.1Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202124.6NANANAUp is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202225.4NAUp is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202325.97Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202425Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202523.9Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201161.36Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201262.01Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201361.67Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201450.71Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201552.17Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201647.13Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201747.5Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201843.93Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201946.6Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202044.3Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202140.2NANANAUp is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202247.5NAUp is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202347.26Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202442.6Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202531.1Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201181.38Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201268.85Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201361.75Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201450.85Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201554.75Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201647.98Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201749.9Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201845.77Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201945.5Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202046.7Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202138.8NANANAUp is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202240.5NAUp is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202343.73Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202436.6Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202528.5Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2005/20066.96.9Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20076.96.9Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20086.36.3Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20096.16.1Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20105.65.6Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20115.85.8Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20125.25.2Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20135.45.4Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20145.25.2Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20154.74.7Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20164.54.5Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20174.34.3Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201844Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20193.93.9Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20203.83.8Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20213.4Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20223.9Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20233.5Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20243.2Up is Bad CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2009100Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2010116Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2011126Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2012138Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2013151Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2014156Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2015145Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2016149Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2017141Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2018147Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2019141Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2020117Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2021107Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2022115Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2023114Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2024102Up is Good CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2003/20043.7Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2004/20053.5Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2005/20064.9Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2006/20075.6Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2007/20086Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2008/20094.7Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2009/20105Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2010/20115Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2011/20125Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2012/20133.8Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2013/20143.5Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2014/20152.9Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2015/20162.8Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2016/20172.5Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2017/20183.4Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2018/20194.6Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2019/20203.9Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2020/20213.5Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2021/20222.8Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2022/20233.1Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2023/20243.2Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NCUp is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/201312.9Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/201410.8Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/201510.4Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/20169.5Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.7Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/201812.8Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/201913.9Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020NCUp is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2007/200824.1Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2008/200924.1Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2009/201024.1Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2010/201124.1Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2011/201224.7Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2012/201324.7Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2013/201424.7Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2014/201516.4Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2015/201616.4Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2016/201715.9Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2017/201815.9Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2018/201918.9Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2019/202018.9Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2020/202118.9Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20110.9Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20121Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20131.3Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20141.3Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20150.7Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20160.9Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.8Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.9Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20190.6Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20200.9Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20210.9Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20231Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2010/201153.1Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/201261Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/201363.2Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/201463.4Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/201572.2Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/201693.1Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017100.9Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/201888.5Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/201983.6Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/202072Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/202167.5Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/202242.3Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/202333Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/202426.5Up is Bad CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201173.66Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201273.36Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201373.99Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201469Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NANeutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201777.1Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018NCNeutral CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022603.6Up is Bad CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023601.7Up is Bad CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024603.5Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2010/2011108.8Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012103.3Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013109.4Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014111.2Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015121.9Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016140.8Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017136.4Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018136.8Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019126.7Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/202094.7Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/202184Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/202291.6Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/202381.8Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/202467.6Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014142.7Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015129.7Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016103.7Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017143.3Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018157.3Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019132.4Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020119.4Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/202139.9Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/202280.2Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023107Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024120.4Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2010/201142.4Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/201255.6Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013111.6Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/201497.3Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015111Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016180.7Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017111.6Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/201898.5Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019127.4Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/202099.1Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021114.1Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022173Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023144.8Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024115.6Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012338.81Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013435Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014407.79Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015562.5Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016692.03Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017658.1Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018565.64Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019508.04Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020365.08Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021457.38Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022390.86Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023254.51Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024178.3Up is Bad CHP34aAbsolute gap in % of children totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks between highest and lowest York ward (4 year aggregated ward data)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202136.5Up is Bad CHP34aAbsolute gap in % of children totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks between highest and lowest York ward (4 year aggregated ward data)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202236.7Up is Bad CHP34aAbsolute gap in % of children totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks between highest and lowest York ward (4 year aggregated ward data)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202338.98Up is Bad CHP34aAbsolute gap in % of children totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks between highest and lowest York ward (4 year aggregated ward data)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202439.3Up is Bad CHP34aAbsolute gap in % of children totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks between highest and lowest York ward (4 year aggregated ward data)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202536.43Up is Bad CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/2014153.23132.92140.04153.23Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015307.08158.83153.54248.84307.08Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016468.52314.67458.03492.99468.52Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/2017538548453458538Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018454373372418454Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/2019482412455435482Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/2020504443504Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201455.8859.8457.3255.88Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201561.460.9858.0660.9861.4Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201663.6460.6761.0658.5463.64Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201767.853.259.362.167.8Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201865.168.267.666.165.1Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201970.474.671.76370.1Up is Good CMHD05People entering IAPT (in month) as % of those estimated to have anxiety/depression (VoY CCG) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20177.513.28.47.57.5Neutral CMHD05People entering IAPT (in month) as % of those estimated to have anxiety/depression (VoY CCG) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201815.57.78.611.311.39.811.110.410.410.612.510.610.616.114.615.515.5Neutral CMHD05People entering IAPT (in month) as % of those estimated to have anxiety/depression (VoY CCG) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201914.414.611.514.814.81515.413.413.415.71.216.716.716.313.214.414.4Neutral CMHD05People entering IAPT (in month) as % of those estimated to have anxiety/depression (VoY CCG) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20201813.418Neutral CMHP15ANumber of bed days in secondary mental health care hospitals, per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20144786.444976.024975.665069.744786.44Up is Bad CMHP15ANumber of bed days in secondary mental health care hospitals, per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20158285.595022.715282.146566.948285.89Up is Bad CMHP15ANumber of bed days in secondary mental health care hospitals, per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20164989.346522.55971.825997.174989.34Up is Bad CMHP15ANumber of bed days in secondary mental health care hospitals, per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20174252.324413.084285.164324.924252.32Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2006/20072.6Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2007/20082.3Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2008/20092.2Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2009/20102.2Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2010/20112.2Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/20121.6Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/20132.2Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20142.3Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015321.4Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20161.7Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20172.6Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20182.4Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20193.5Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20202.7Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/20211.5Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20221.8Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20232.7Up is Bad CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2010/201195.8Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/201295.25Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201396.25Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201495.78Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201595.1595.794.3NC96.3Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20169695.893.694.695.1Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201796.376.495.696.495.5Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201895.61Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201995.86Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202095.17Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202195.59Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202293.54Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202394.5Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202496Up is Good CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015521820104Up is Bad CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016226781Up is Bad CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201843116818Up is Bad CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/2020NAUp is Bad CSB16aHospital admissions for dental caries (0-4 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015368.7Up is Bad CSB16aHospital admissions for dental caries (0-4 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016342.9Up is Bad CSB16aHospital admissions for dental caries (0-4 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017353.55Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018480.2Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019534.3Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020507Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021418.1Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022277.4Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023126.6Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/202464.8Up is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015263797Up is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20163371484Up is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201713Up is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018NC2Up is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/2020NAUp is Bad CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20153891301076983Neutral CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201625578547350Neutral CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201713025412044Neutral CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201819246664040Neutral CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201922946634575Neutral CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202012698Neutral CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2009/20101632Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2010/20111726Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2011/20121953Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2012/20131593149130122401122112132366151140143434117135140392Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2013/20141530121114119354125168132425161123133417107114113334Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2014/20151808113133158404177216135528158155197510128113125366Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2015/201615181281181333791631531354511381071273728591140316Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017139999137148384154124108386122981313519075113278Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018111510780892761001271293561008676262736484221Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2018/20199998176842417610593274907592257777674227Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2019/20209037889712386893672289187100278475557159Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2020/202155737233191726256190533110218647182590Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022656575369179676144172604776183393944122Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2022/20234233644381183333309619323889324741120Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2023/2024625454144130636569197394551135384778163Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2024/2025729594973181728168221584669173604351154Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2025/202657514315179875021648547Up is Bad CSP29bNumber of Incidents of Alcohol Related ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017594336648147695352174493663148423449125Up is Bad CSP29bNumber of Incidents of Alcohol Related ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018NC5435421313750431303633NCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad CSP29bNumber of Incidents of Alcohol Related ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANAUp is Bad EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2012/20131062Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2013/20141728Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2014/20151683Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2015/20161457Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2016/20171864Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2017/20181986Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2018/20191691Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2019/20201737Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2020/20211225Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2021/20221250Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2022/20231378Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2023/20241266Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2024/20251191Up is Good EH1AChlamydia diagnoses (15-19 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201419221344153218141922Up is Good EH1AChlamydia diagnoses (15-19 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201514161756164015321416Up is Good EH1AChlamydia diagnoses (15-19 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201613661438Up is Good EH1BChlamydia diagnoses (20-24 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201417341200150816741734Up is Good EH1BChlamydia diagnoses (20-24 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201514951793162315041495Up is Good EH1BChlamydia diagnoses (20-24 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201614531518Up is Good EH1BChlamydia diagnoses (20-24 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018457Up is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2021/202226.5Up is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2022/202321Up is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2023/202417.1Up is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2024/202515.8Up is Good HLTH01aPupils achieving a Good Level of Development at age 5 (%)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201464.8Up is Good HLTH01aPupils achieving a Good Level of Development at age 5 (%)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201774.3Up is Good HLTH02aLimiting long term illness or disability (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201515.3Up is Bad HLTH03aProvision of 1 hour or more unpaid care per week (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20159.2Up is Bad HLTH04aPensioners living alone (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.3Up is Bad HLTH05aObese adults (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201523Up is Bad HLTH06aBinge drinking adults (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201529.7Up is Bad HLTH07aHealthy eating adults (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201528.3Up is Good HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015104.3Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201697.1Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018141.3Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020153.8Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021141.1Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024145Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Aug 2026Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20157.6Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20167.3Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201810.1Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202010.2Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202111.7Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202410.4Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Aug 2026Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20158.3Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20166.6Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20187.9Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20208.2Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202111.1Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20248.1Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Aug 2026Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201597.1Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016110.2Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018126.2Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020133.2Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021119.6Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Aug 2026Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201555.6Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201659.2Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201870.7Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202188.8Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Aug 2026Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/202069380Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/202152740Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/202263245Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/202030775Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/202122880Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/202227890Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/202038605Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/202129855Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/202235350Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/20207240Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/20214930Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/20226395Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/202032215Neutral HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/202125585Neutral HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/202229625Neutral HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Neutral HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Neutral HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Neutral HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/202029925Up is Bad HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/202122225Up is Bad HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/202227230Up is Bad HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Up is Bad HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201674.423.3562.645974.4Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201778.374.3270.1473.778.3Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201885.6184.285.484.785.61Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201985.98788.288.785.9Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202087.7886.3387.3986.6287.78Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202177.6255.0959.7173.6777.62Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202266.7579.6883.5483.6966.75Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202386.2672.3284.7386.5786.26Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202474.285.2487.9182.9474.2Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202562.2470.9668.0166.6762.24Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202684.6284.08Up is Good HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201621.767.9830.573521.7Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201712.7721.2119.6417.712.77Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20189.9112.310.111.99.91Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201911.711.710.59.611.7Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202010.2312.2311.0411.7410.23Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202121.8237.9739.0726.121.82Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202232.2118.7215.515.1132.21Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202312.8727.6813.7912.4412.87Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202425.2213.9312.0915.4925.22Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202535.9927.1231.1832.2835.99Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202613.3912.85Up is Bad HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201670.861.5463.166570.8Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201777.0975.2278.9677.877.09Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201882.4682.783.183.282.46Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201989.285.386.488.489.2Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202087.5988.5588.8988.5687.59Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202188.6982.2684.1987.5288.69Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202285.4487.9487.248785.44Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20238686.4786.8484.8386Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202482.568788.7486.7482.56Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202586.2286.1980.586.0886.22Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202686.2983.78Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201630.130.5925.822130.1Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201744.2334.0336.8735.744.23Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201843.1544.544.342.343.15Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201949.3844.645.748.6749.38Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202048.3946.9245.6350.8948.39Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202149.145.0145.7350.349.1Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202248.5247.853.1448.4348.52Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202350.8650.3852.6549.7950.86Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202451.1650.595053.9351.16Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202554.6351.6748.3951.6554.63Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202647.9751.6Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201616.7718.1620.811820.4Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201741.6523.9821.662541.65Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201872.2165.7736972.21Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201981.878.479.883.881.8Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202086.1483.1583.8686.2986.14Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202168.5681.8985.7580.7868.56Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202288.3864.1885.2293.488.38Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202388.9593.2393.1292.7588.95Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202492.6895.3692.8992.2792.68Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202591.5294.4688.9592.0691.52Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202693.8391.49Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20167022.2232.234770Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201776.9268.9474.8174.576.92Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201881.5279.480.281.981.52Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201984.778.580.582.484.7Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202086.7686.4984.683.4886.76Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202184.187.2383.3386.1484.1Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202293.679.4967.6786.7793.6Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202393.1390.5494.0694.4293.13Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202495.4992.6696.191.8195.49Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202594.2792.3796.3392.694.27Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202694.5493.57Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201611.67.4510.821511.6Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201718.5522.3923.0816.118.55Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201862.644646.362.162.64Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201971.260.870.669.871.2Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202072.6572.6171.3776.2872.65Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202174.1678.2776.2585.2574.16Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202285.0451.1641.7783.1785.04Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202387.1985.3486.6789.887.19Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202491.3488.0888.4690.7191.34Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202587.6588.9289.590.8687.65Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202691.4192.48Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201652.257.953.850.552.2Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201759.455.256.75459.4Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201854.7356.85653.854.73Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201959.456.65758.759.4Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202059.0958.0456.6560.1459.09Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202158.3357.6757.0759.4858.33Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202259.4357.2262.8758.6359.43Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202361.7959.4762.3162.361.79Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202464.5260.6260.4463.6664.52Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202566.6764.263.5562.5766.67Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202659.4365.22Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201990.5589.0588.3390.1190.55Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202093.8886.989.3488.2493.88Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202184.2192.9892.3590.4384.21Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202288.5786.6490.189.4688.57Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202390.2486.6188.2986.1290.24Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202492.3990.2995.5791.8292.39Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202592.4591.8990.9693.4492.45Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202691.1994.65Up is Good HV24aAbsolute gap in % of children who reach expected level of development at 2-2.5 years of age between highest and lowest York ward (4 yr aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NAUp is Bad HV24aAbsolute gap in % of children who reach expected level of development at 2-2.5 years of age between highest and lowest York ward (4 yr aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202213.1Up is Bad HV24aAbsolute gap in % of children who reach expected level of development at 2-2.5 years of age between highest and lowest York ward (4 yr aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202313.65Up is Bad HV24aAbsolute gap in % of children who reach expected level of development at 2-2.5 years of age between highest and lowest York ward (4 yr aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202410.53Up is Bad HV24aAbsolute gap in % of children who reach expected level of development at 2-2.5 years of age between highest and lowest York ward (4 yr aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20259.6Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2009/20109.63Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2010/201110.16Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2011/201211.52Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2012/201311.91Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2013/201411.69Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2014/201510.3Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2009/20104Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2010/20114.55Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2011/20124.97Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2012/20135.54Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2013/20145.65Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2014/20155.4Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201013.08Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201112.79Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201212.88Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201313.28Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201412.79Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201512.88Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201613.28Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201711.59Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201816.1Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201914.3Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202012.2Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20104.8Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20115.52Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20125.76Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.83Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20146.44Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20156.11Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20166.41Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20175.62Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20184.2Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NAUp is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20204.3Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201750.8Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201858.8Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201955.1Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202053.7Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202160.7Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202248.2Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202368.4Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202465.5Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201721.2Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201813.6Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201915.2Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202018.8Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202115Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202221Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202326.7Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202417.7Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201537.1Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201641.7Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201746.4Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201841.9Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201928.1Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202023.5Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202128.4Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202238.1Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202333.5Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202429.9Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017878Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018917Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20191172Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20201039Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021884Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022981Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023993Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20241141Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017445Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018398Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019509Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020518Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021496Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022579Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023491Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024496Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20172411Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20182912Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20193103Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20203057Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20212468Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20222913Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20232976Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20243401Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017978Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018968Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20191084Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20201118Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021942Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20221075Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20231001Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20241063Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017710Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018772Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019688Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020699Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021602Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022675Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023618Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024782Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017390Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018381Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019444Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020414Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021326Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022298Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023261Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024285Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20091412Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20101415Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20111464Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20121425Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20131619Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20141998Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20152020Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20162171Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20172263Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20182372Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20192536Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/2009447Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/2010462Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/2011444Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012462Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013595Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014659Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015636Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016661Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017691Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018724Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019713Up is Bad LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201431.423.632.630.831.4Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201531.634.232.234.331.6Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016403233.936.940Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201738.1936.8139.3237.2738.19Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201833.535.2532.8834.0833.5Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201931.0730.129.6533.0731.07Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202032.1132.3630.631.0332.11Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202127.131.8631.9629.3427.1Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202226.531.0130.428.4726.5Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202326.6322.0123.8427.0726.63Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202425.7529.4826.0524.2825.75Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202521.0321.7123.5127.0721.03Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202621.5225.61Up is Good LDHC08% of adults with a learning disability having a GP Health Check - (VoY CCG)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201433Up is Good LDHC08% of adults with a learning disability having a GP Health Check - (VoY CCG)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201551Up is Good LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018221.28200.51212.05251.27221.28Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019230.24244.64238.93241.73241.77241.86228.08224.1231.35219.82213.75152.59195.39247.14238.95271.32252.47Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020223228216245203Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202139060904Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022239162236118442Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023263.1233.39240.52237341.51Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024334.64374.14323.69283.25357.49Neutral NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20088.19Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20096.69Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20105.43Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20117.45Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20128.59Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20138.08Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20147.82Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20157.11Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20168.59Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20178.52Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189.28Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20199.54Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20207.6Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20228.9Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20237.8Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20248.8Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20259.93Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200816.51Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200917.05Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201014.07Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201114.71Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201216.39Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201316.34Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201415.44Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201515.09Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201615.14Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201716.13Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201817.41Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201915.07Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202022.1Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202218.87Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202318.7Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202419.2Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202519.33Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200822.61Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200917.06Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201014.41Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201117.59Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201222.17Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201321Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201422.43Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201519.14Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201622.37Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201720.83Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201824.07Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201923.65Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202021.4Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202222.7Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202319.9Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202422.8Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202523.18Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20117.22Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201214.55Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.08Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20144.4Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20157.8Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20167.5Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20177.6Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20188.1Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20199.5Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20209.5Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20226.8Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20235.66Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202410.92Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20258.2Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201121.38Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201216.36Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201311.17Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201412.8Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201510.6Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201611.6Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201711.6Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201814.8Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201914.1Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202011Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202213.9Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202311.63Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202415.44Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202511.38Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201118.35Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201218.79Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201315.22Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201412.6Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201512.9Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201615.5Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201718.6Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201815.9Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201919.8Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202024.2Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202224.4Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202324.68Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202422.84Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202518.58Up is Bad NGPP01Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupationsAnnualFinancial Year2012/20138.07Neutral NGPP01Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupationsAnnualFinancial Year2013/201413.66Neutral NGPP01Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupationsAnnualFinancial Year2014/201515.24Neutral NGPP01Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupationsAnnualFinancial Year2015/201613.19Neutral NGPP01Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupationsAnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.09Neutral NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2008/20092666.6Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2009/20102901Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2010/20112778.9Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/20123051.5Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/20132576.3Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/20142671.8Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/20152273.6Up is Bad PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2016/201760.4Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2017/201862.260.460.360.560.560.560.861.161.161.262.4626262.462.462.262.2Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2018/201960.562.363.363.163.163.464.264.464.463.26362.262.261.46160.560.5Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2019/202057.259.758.958.758.758.759.358.858.859.358.357.757.757.757.557.257.2Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2020/202153.255.454.153.453.453.753.853.853.853.953.253.153.152.252.153.253.2Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2021/202255.153.554.254.154.154.755.3555555.355.254.754.753.954.655.155.1Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2022/202356.15555.255.555.555.555.65656575756.256.255.155.256.156.1Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2023/202454.555.655.3555555.155.255.255.254.754.954.354.353.954.154.554.5Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2024/202556.654.254.354.854.854.654.554.755.656.756.856.556.356.6Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2025/202656.357Up is Good PHOF01% of physically active and inactive adults - active adults AnnualFinancial Year2012/201361.54Up is Good PHOF01% of physically active and inactive adults - active adults AnnualFinancial Year2013/201466.16Up is Good PHOF01% of physically active and inactive adults - active adults AnnualFinancial Year2014/201562.18Up is Good PHOF01% of physically active and inactive adults - active adults AnnualFinancial Year2015/201669.83Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201666.71Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201772.03Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201876.4Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201975.16Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202070.92Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202169.29Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202275.2Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202373.6Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202478.6Up is Good PHOF02% of active and inactive adults - inactive adults AnnualFinancial Year2012/201323.67Up is Bad PHOF02% of active and inactive adults - inactive adults AnnualFinancial Year2013/201421.09Up is Bad PHOF02% of active and inactive adults - inactive adults AnnualFinancial Year2014/201521.57Up is Bad PHOF02% of active and inactive adults - inactive adults AnnualFinancial Year2015/201617.54Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201621.1Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201718.3Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201813.8Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201915.8Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202017.6Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202121.2Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202215.4Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202316.3Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202410.8Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012461.73Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013594.09Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014657.5Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015633.84Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016658.5Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017687Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2008/200935.8Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2009/201027.7Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2010/20112727.1Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/201225.321.427.825.217.6Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201322.9628.513.432.219.2Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201421.5921.721.424.117.7Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201515.7110.520.913.322Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201620.4124.518.916.315.2Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201714.816.615.112.5Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201815.6Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201421.421.4Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201516.518.618.515.716.5Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201618.82019.620.418.8Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201716.816.815.814.816.8Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20181314.814.315.613Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201917.213.715.816.117.2Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202015.918.216.816.415.9Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/20219.915.112.812.49.9Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202212.19.910.910.212.1Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/2023Due April 2613.113.613.6Due April 26Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201113.9Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201214.1Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201313.8Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201410.7Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201511.2Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201612.3Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201711.1Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201810.4Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201911.6Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202010.4Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202110.3Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20228Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20238.1Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20246.2Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20254.74.15.944.8Up is Bad PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201465.13Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201566.05Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201665.99Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201766.16Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201864.83Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201965.97Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202066.34Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202165.8Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202266.15Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202364.08Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202462.68Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201463.91Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201565.17Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201665.15Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201765.29Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201864.44Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201964.82Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202065.23Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202164.67Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202265.15Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202363.61Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202462.01Up is Good PHOF11Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201420.933.339.6715.0720.93Up is Good PHOF11Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201538.1122.5326.6831.838.11Up is Good PHOF11Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201670.6748.435763.470.67Up is Good PHOF11Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201772.571.9172.272.272.5Up is Good PHOF11Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201872.772.572.672.772.7Up is Good PHOF11bCumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201441.5446.9145.7543.7741.54Up is Good PHOF11bCumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201539.3541.7541.6441.1239.35Up is Good PHOF11bCumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201637.5739.3238.6337.8137.57Up is Good PHOF11bCumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201737.437.4737.337.437.4Up is Good PHOF11bCumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201837.837.637.637.737.8Up is Good PHOF12Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20148.691.564.426.68.69Up is Good PHOF12Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201514.999.4111.1113.0714.99Up is Good PHOF12Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201626.5519.0422.0223.9726.55Up is Good PHOF12Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201727.126.9526.92727.1Up is Good PHOF12Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201827.527.327.327.427.5Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/200481.82Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/200582.04Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/200682.61Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/200782.98Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/200883.17Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/200982.94Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/201082.9Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/201182.71Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/201282.93Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/201383.04Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201483.37Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201583.37Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201683.4Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201783.4Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201883.42Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201983.27Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202083.55Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202183.49Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202283.62Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202383.37Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202483.61Up is Good PHOF162Smoking prevalence in adults (18-64) - socio-economic gap in current smokers (APS) RatioAnnualFinancial Year2016/20173.43Up is Bad PHOF162Smoking prevalence in adults (18-64) - socio-economic gap in current smokers (APS) RatioAnnualFinancial Year2017/20185.31Up is Bad PHOF162Smoking prevalence in adults (18-64) - socio-economic gap in current smokers (APS) RatioAnnualFinancial Year2018/20191.89Up is Bad PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20151771Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20161806Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20171810Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20181825Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20191902Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20201866Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20212032Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20221900Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20232010Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20241953Neutral PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20146.23Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20155.46Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20164.49Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20174.26Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20185.35Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20196.41Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20206.22Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20215.94Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20226.15Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20236.73Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20246.71Up is Bad PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2001/20022412Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2002/20032402Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2003/20042467Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2004/20052332Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2005/20062189Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20072343Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20082230Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20092259Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20102308Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20112300Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20122412Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20132375Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20142363Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20152323Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20162407Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20172510Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20182496Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20192624Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20202574Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20212683Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20222636Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20232740Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20242710Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20252703Neutral PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2013/201493.04Up is Good PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2014/201591.4Up is Good PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2015/201696.24Up is Good PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NAUp is Good PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018NAUp is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2013/201499.4Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2014/201599.2Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2015/201699.5Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NAUp is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2017/201899.7Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2018/201999.7Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2019/202098.9Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2020/202198.9Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2021/202299.9Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2022/202399.5Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2023/202499.5Up is Good PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201225.4Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201325.7Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201434.4Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.8Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201628.1Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201726.4Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201824.6Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201918.6Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202026.9Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202122.3Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202220.9Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202315.2Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202418.8Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201215.5Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201317Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201418.7Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201517.2Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201614.6Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.6Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201911.5Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202011.9Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202111.7Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20229.2Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20238.7Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20248.1Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20122.42Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20131.84Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20143.05Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20152.91Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20162.74Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20173.43Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20185.31Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20191.89Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20204.85Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20212.47Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20223.75Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20232.19Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20243.3Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201325.7Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201434.4Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.8Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201628.2Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201726.4Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201824.6Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201918.6Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2010/20112272Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2011/20122143Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2012/20132040Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2013/20142098Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2014/20152110Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2015/20162346Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2016/20172279Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2017/20182253Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2018/20192519Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2019/20202487Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2020/20212215Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2021/20222065Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2022/20232009Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2023/20242058Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2011/20125.04Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2012/20135.04Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2013/20145.04Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2014/20155.04Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2015/20165.04Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2016/20175.51Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2017/20185.51Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2018/20195.51Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2019/20205.51Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2021/20225.51Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20106.5Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20117.3Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20123.4Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.2Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20142.9Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20152.2Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20161.9Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20175.1Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20182.6Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20193.6Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20203.4Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20212.4Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20221.7Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20232Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Due May 26Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201199.3Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201299.5Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201395.7Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014100.4Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015111.8Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016104.7Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017121.1Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018133.2Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019121.1Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020101.5Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202182.3Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202287Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202389.5Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202482.8Up is Bad PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201182.72Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201282.91Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201382.44Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201481.42Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201580.63Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201680Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201779.9Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201879.6Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201978.9Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202079.69Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202179.92Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202264.76Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202371.75Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202472.55Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202575.5Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201177.38Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201276.93Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201375.97Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201474.75Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201574.69Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201673.69Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201773.8Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201873Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201971.7Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20148.71.62.92.22.1Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20157.31.71.721.9Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20169.82.3322.6Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20170.2000.10.1Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20180.40.20.10.10.1Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20192.30.10.60.70.9Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20202.40.70.60.70.5Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202100000Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20221.9000.61.3Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20234.20.60.81.21.7Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20243.61.40.70.60.8Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/20253.70.50.40.62.1Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/20261.3Up is Good PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2003/20047.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2004/20058.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2005/20069.2Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20078.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20087.8Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20099.4Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201010Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201110.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20129.3Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20138.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201411.3Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201511.1Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201614Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.9Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201813.5Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201911.9Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202011.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202113.3Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202213.4Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202312.9Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20249.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20258.7Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2001/200225.7Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2002/200319.5Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2003/200415.2Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2004/200519.6Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2005/200614.5Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20079.2Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200817.3Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200934.5Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201019.1Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201123.5Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201214.5Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201315.6Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201414.7Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201516.8Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201626.2Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201731Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201831.9Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201915.3Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020-4.7Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202145.3Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20228Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Feb 26Up is Bad PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/200476.84Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/200577.28Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/200677.26Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/200777.79Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/200878.31Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/200978.97Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/201079.15Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/201179.36Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/201279.23Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/201379.47Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201479.34Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201580.05Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201680.2Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201780.34Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201880.12Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201980.04Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202080.11Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202179.82Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202279.81Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202379.47Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202479.77Up is Good PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20146.65Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20155.7Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20167.25Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20178.15Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189.34Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20198.78Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20208.62Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20218.84Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20229.84Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202310.57Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202410.08Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2010/201113.5Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201214.1Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201314.3Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201415.9Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201513.1Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20161316.920.821.313Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201716.1114.8614.3514.6616.1116.11Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201815.1915.1515.515.6415.6415.6515.4415.6515.6515.915.9415.4915.4915.5115.2115.1915.19Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201913.9614.9815.22151515.114.8314.5814.5814.614.2714.1914.1914.5214.5513.9613.96Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202014.1513.914.0313.9413.9413.9214.3114.3414.3414.2714.7914.5214.5214.0514.0214.1514.15Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/202112.7614.1414.2414.2514.2513.9213.8113.8513.8513.7213.8113.3813.3813.0912.9112.7612.76Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202213.1512.7212.4112.1612.1612.4112.3312.5212.5213.0212.9312.8512.8512.912.9913.1513.15Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/202313.112.913.513.713.713.513.814.614.614.213.413.313.313.31313.113.1Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/202414.913.313.513.713.713.514.414.614.615.515.715.615.615.614.614.914.9Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/202514.914.914.615151514.614.714.714.914.614.414.414.514.314.914.9Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/20261515.114.914.914.914.914.514.514.714.714.414.4Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2011/201264Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2012/201363Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2013/201463Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2014/201563.2Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2015/201669.3Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2016/201768.5Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2017/201863.9Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2018/201956.4Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2019/202058Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2020/202156.6Up is Bad PHOF44% of adults classified as overweight or obeseAnnualFinancial Year2014/201556.88Up is Bad PHOF44% of adults classified as overweight or obeseAnnualFinancial Year2015/201656.4Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201659.3Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201758.9Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201856.5Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201957.2Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202062.2Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202163.6Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202259.5Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202363.3Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202460.1Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201317.01Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201418.72Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201517.24Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201614.63Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.6Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201911.5Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2003/2004170.8Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2004/2005162.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2005/2006160.9Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2006/2007152.8Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2007/2008147.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2008/2009136.8Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2009/2010131.7Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2010/2011132.1Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012137.4Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013141Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014147.1Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015139.2Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016135.3Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017126.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018130.5Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019132.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020135.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021144.4Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022153.2Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023158.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024152.4Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2003/2004130.6Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2004/2005119.3Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2005/2006109.1Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2006/200799.4Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200893.7Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200985.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201078.3Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201177Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201275.5Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201372.1Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201473.3Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201569.4Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201667.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201765.1Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201864.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201967.5Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202065.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202166.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202265Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202368.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202465.9Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/2004186.2Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/2005170.3Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/2006157.4Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/2007147.5Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/2008138.8Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/2009127.2Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/2010117.8Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/2011116.6Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012119.3Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013114.1Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014115.4Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015101.6Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201698Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201792.8Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201894.5Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201996Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202091.7Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202192.5Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202291.9Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023102.3Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202496.7Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2003/2004157.8Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2004/2005152.3Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2005/2006151.5Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2006/2007144.8Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2007/2008146.3Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/2009141.3Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/2010142Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/2011138.5Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012146.3Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013149.5Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014149.8Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015139.9Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016130.4Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017130.5Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018132.9Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019133.9Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020132Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021128.2Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022134Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023131Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024130.9Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/2004190Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/2005180.4Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/2006188.2Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/2007175.6Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/2008170Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/2009154.9Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/2010154.8Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/2011152.5Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012160.1Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013163.6Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014170.8Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015162.7Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016154Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017145.5Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018147.8Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019142.8Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020146.4Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021141.7Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022152.6Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023144.7Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024141.3Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2003/200411.3Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2004/200514.5Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2005/200613.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2006/200715.3Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200815.7Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200914.5Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201013.2Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201111.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201213.4Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201315.1Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201413.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201513.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201615.2Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201716.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201816.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201914.9Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202013.9Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202114.4Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202214.3Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202318.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202419.5Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/200413.5Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/200516.1Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/200618Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/200720.7Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/200822.7Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/200920.3Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/201018.6Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/201115Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/201215.4Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/201316.7Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201416.1Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201516.4Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201618.4Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201720.2Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201823.2Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201920.9Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202018.5Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202116.4Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202215.7Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202322.1Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202425.5Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2003/200432.8Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2004/200530.6Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2005/200630.7Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2006/200727Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200826.2Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200926.1Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201029.2Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201132.2Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201233.2Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201331.9Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201432.6Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201531.1Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201630.8Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201728.1Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201829.1Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201933.2Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202033.8Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202131Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202223.8Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202323.5Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202425.6Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/200442.7Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/200536.2Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/200635.7Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/200735.5Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/200833.5Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/200933.9Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/201035.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/201136.6Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/201236.8Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/201335.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201437.2Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201535.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201632Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201729.9Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201831Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201937.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202035.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202134.3Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202225.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202326.8Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202428.7Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2003/20047.1Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2004/20057.8Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2005/20067.5Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20078.2Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20089Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200911.6Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201011.8Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201110.9Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20128.3Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.2Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20145.5Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20154.2Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20165.8Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20175.9Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20186.7Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20198.4Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20209Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20219.9Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20226.9Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20239.2Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202411.2Up is Bad PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201476.45.16.27Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20155.26.266.15.2Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20165.55.56.15.95.5Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20179.396.077.978.059.39Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20186.39.398.797.756.3Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20194.75.525.294.74.7Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20206.344.574.555.166.34Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/20213.46.55.334.963.4Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20224.383.864.033.594.38Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20235.423.825.535.355.42Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20244.45.454.235.374.4Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/20252.994.24.093.382.99Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/20263.293.34Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201434.630.931.130.534.6Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201540.136.535.638.840.1Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201631.13834.833.331.1Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201738.0832.5137.9337.8938.08Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201832.1136.9333.9129.9632.11Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201929.230.3326.6131.529.2Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202027.7128.7132.4931.8427.71Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202129.329.327.6728.9729.3Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202226.527.6129.728.7326.5Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20232024.7821.419.9220Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202419.5221.9922.2223.319.52Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202517.1416.517.715.8417.14Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202618.7223.59Up is Good PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2011/201243.5Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2012/201338.5Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2013/201442.3Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2014/201544.4Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2015/201652.9Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2016/201746.7Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2017/201847.1Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2018/201950Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2019/202058.3Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2020/202180Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2021/202283.3Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023100Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2023/202450Up is Bad PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201420.93.36.35.45.9Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201519.64.14.15.16.3Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201628.15.98.66.47.3Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20170.80.20.30.10.2Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20180.40.20.10.10.1Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201925.39.23.66.36.2Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202017.53.72.74.76.4Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202100000Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20221.9000.61.3Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20235.30.71.21.42Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20244.41.810.80.8Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/20254.50.70.50.82.5Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/20261.3Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201441.546.945.140.235.8Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201537.342.741.138.430.4Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201634.939.134.730.535.4Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201721.45.9010041.9Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018100100100100100Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20199.21.615.711.714.1Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202013.919.32114.87.1Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202100000Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202210000100100Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202379.87964.285.985Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202481.481708097Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202581.681807784Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202695Up is Good PHYS05% of Adults (aged 16+) who have taken part in sport and physical activity at least twice in the last 28 daysAnnualFinancial Year2016/201784.882.784.8Up is Good PHYS05% of Adults (aged 16+) who have taken part in sport and physical activity at least twice in the last 28 daysAnnualFinancial Year2017/201884.0185.2Up is Good PHYS05% of Adults (aged 16+) who have taken part in sport and physical activity at least twice in the last 28 daysAnnualFinancial Year2018/201987.78487.7Up is Good PHYS05% of Adults (aged 16+) who have taken part in sport and physical activity at least twice in the last 28 daysAnnualFinancial Year2019/202084.1Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201770.267.971.01Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201870.269.4Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201974.973.1Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202067.172.77Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20216366.763Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202266.566.566.5Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202370.470.4Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202469.869.8Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202576.576.5Up is Good POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2013/20142623Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2014/20152680Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2015/20162717Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2016/20172788Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2017/20182788Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2018/20192779Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2019/20202834Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2020/20212927Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2021/20222954Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2022/20233004Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2023/20243092Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2024/20253129Up is Bad PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/201296Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201395Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201493Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201593Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20169494949494Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201794.2594949495Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201893.892.791.294.994.2Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20199396949489Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20209598969595Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202189.2NC9397.789.2Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20228692858686Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202389.5939190.178.5Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20249392929493Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202590909189.990Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/2026899190Up is Good PP07% of businesses that were compliant with legislation concerning the illegal use and sale of alcohol and tobaccoAnnualFinancial Year2011/201291Up is Good PP07% of businesses that were compliant with legislation concerning the illegal use and sale of alcohol and tobaccoAnnualFinancial Year2012/201398Up is Good PP07% of businesses that were compliant with legislation concerning the illegal use and sale of alcohol and tobaccoAnnualFinancial Year2013/201475Up is Good PP07% of businesses that were compliant with legislation concerning the illegal use and sale of alcohol and tobaccoAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015100Up is Good PP07% of businesses that were compliant with legislation concerning the illegal use and sale of alcohol and tobaccoAnnualFinancial Year2015/201663.2Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2011/201298Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2012/201399Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2013/20149998999999999998999998999997989798Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2014/201598979799989899989899989798989910099Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2015/20169898999998Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2016/20179897949796999896989899999898989998Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2017/201898100999899999997989998989898949696Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019989397979698989997999810099991009799Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2019/20209910099100100100981009910099989998989998Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021601001001271174046347587928583898686Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2021/20228784828283878586868393908791949092Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2022/20239385919490899095919798999893959695Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2023/202498989697979896989799999999969810098Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2024/202597949595959897979797971009895969896Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2025/20269596979696979897Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2011/2012100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2012/201399Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2013/2014100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017100100100NA100100NA100100NANANANA100NANA100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2023/2024100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2024/2025100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2025/2026100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2011/2012100Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2012/201397Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2013/20149392929895979592959696889583949793Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2014/20159389939693969495949696859292939393Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2015/20169091929383Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2016/20178567828076998991939185798566909283Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2017/20188384948788949195939285788567827274Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2018/20198673807275818779828897909290969493Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2019/20208987879489928991918990858890909190Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2020/20218276778880899183888583748187838386Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2021/20227278847980797355696271746969856974Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2022/20234735594546425140444468475326575345Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2023/20244754595757626162625242444624303730Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2024/20256938293935443694589295879192939593Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2025/20268591868794949494Up is Good PVP01People supported through personal budgets or direct payments receiving community-based services (%) (ADASS Survey definition)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201484.13Up is Good PVP01People supported through personal budgets or direct payments receiving community-based services (%) (ADASS Survey definition)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201591.2987.5387.9287.9291.1491.1488.0989.3388.5788.5789.2190.2591.2991.29Up is Good PVP01People supported through personal budgets or direct payments receiving community-based services (%) (ADASS Survey definition)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201693.8892.292.592.8192.593.1293.3293.5693.3394.2894.294.4994.3295.0795.3195.6695.35Up is Good PVP01People supported through personal budgets or direct payments receiving community-based services (%) (ADASS Survey definition)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NC91.3388.8691.8990.6988.3389.7286.9988.3589.68NCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Good PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/20152413120197022162058212019603016753Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201626028182874192130701316255423192062Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201724834211570231827681318225320221557Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20182461719256120272370172037741518841Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20192523535209024191760251919632181039Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20202012227196830211162121513401213631Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/20211721151127131517451115275317141647Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202221718192057242013571223175212182151Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/202321624251766222317621416144410112344Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/20242052314215816211855721134116142151Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/202524815202459212927771515154532171867Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/202626242373152113491912940Up is Bad PVP04Total number of Acute delayed discharges (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/20151204813251121427111912421051126Up is Bad PVP04Total number of Acute delayed discharges (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016189615163715172153620184425121855Up is Bad PVP04Total number of Acute delayed discharges (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017124161573858102310137301181433Up is Bad PVP04Total number of Acute delayed discharges (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018NA67922316726NANANANANANANANAUp is Bad PVP05Total number of reimbursable CYC delays (attributable to CYC) (YDH Only)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015115641222131111351516134482414Up is Bad PVP05Total number of reimbursable CYC delays (attributable to CYC) (YDH Only)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20161373911231291435111310342481345Up is Bad PVP05Total number of reimbursable CYC delays (attributable to CYC) (YDH Only)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20178915121138638175771943815Up is Bad PVP05Total number of reimbursable CYC delays (attributable to CYC) (YDH Only)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018NA62816115622NANANANANANANANAUp is Bad PVP06Reablement - assessments to be completed within 6 weeks of referralMonthlyFinancial Year2014/201526.8454.5539.292037.9563.6453.3358.4929.4126.6746.1534.0816.671053.8526.84Up is Good PVP06Reablement - assessments to be completed within 6 weeks of referralMonthlyFinancial Year2015/201621.6327.2730.7733.3330.4618.1833.332525.5255.8812.514.461533.33016.11Up is Good PVP06Reablement - assessments to be completed within 6 weeks of referralMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NC16.67012.59.72037.5101633.33NCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Good PVP07OT/OTA assessments - to be completed within 28 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2014/201595.8798.2897.6297.4497.7897.6499.7698.798.5398.4696.6797.8993.7596.4897.3795.87Up is Good PVP07OT/OTA assessments - to be completed within 28 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2015/201696.9797.1298.1195.897.0197.995.997.1296.9797.6496.9296.196.8997.4897.2296.3297.01Up is Good PVP07OT/OTA assessments - to be completed within 28 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NC97.8497.0690.5795.1595.6291.7294.7894.0492.86NCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Good PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/20131784Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/20141753Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201514871810183018301806180613351448150115011508102714871487Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201617621764178317761774175617531765175817361741175417441751179717691772Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201718821945187918841902190019241899190718811896186718811850184018231837Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201818811737171317171856171216981719185616881667162918601639162615771881Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201916651887188418821884188118691854186818401737169817581699166116351665Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202016061737171317171719171216981719172516881667162916471639162615771606Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/202116871680173517731773181418061830183018531853182118211773175116871687Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202217281680Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/20132822Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/20142570Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201526432550252025202582258227082688266826682690313526432643Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201624352444242224372434242824232415242224332427243024302451243924712454Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017931948958898935903906934914916922917918921987967958Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018857929922926904932962955917961945956892949951959857Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20191037912930924922933936920929935100310209861022104710421037Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020958929922926927932962955955961945956955949951959958Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021925908899900900873919933933922935946946931925925925Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022937941Neutral PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2013/20141712.73Up is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2014/20151344.96Up is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2015/20161434.68Up is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018NCUp is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024150234772711401502Up is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2024/20252712483107218742712Up is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2025/2026511Up is Good PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201514Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016224648Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017161124101221361304Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018222316211424281214Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019215229102332272002Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20202642410232712032406Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021203227033630251102Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/20223122610423921253137Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023271258141604041179Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/2024111102121422150000Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/2025182046222600111045Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/2026223732276017Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015447226324136687013843848910655715505251646417264210891Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201662003575254341316470506495147152247953515367374686721877Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201735164793502431072224194304722239331293863231264364859Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018383026725726578923937938410023524253971174227287351865Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201962865584674801505335636487145854549162816645505355741659Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020NC727740634210165752056617434823684631313535375NCNCUp is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015286117631130479137831527496742519014776221510323341Up is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016202243128119290149121111381210298292800154193204551Up is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20172860270253324784200205270675272235297804151149237537Up is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018200418616711046313911222447519818923462119814899445Up is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201918261991771995758592211388178177119474159129101389Up is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020NC1601471985059384117294551987161172121NCNCUp is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad PVP28Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (TEWV only)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20173822296740750354853640514894525153741341196106187489Up is Bad PVP28Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (TEWV only)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20182156295211116622911131313357360247380310280229819Up is Bad PVP28Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (TEWV only)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20192708233274326833195243261699290188170648171130227528Up is Bad PVP28Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (TEWV only)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020NC212186119517273138213183173121477124193NCNCUp is Bad PVP28Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (TEWV only)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/20136.5Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/20146.5Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/20157.8Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20165.76.46.36.36.36.26.1665.75.65.55.55.45.55.75.7Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20177.36.26.56.66.66.76.97.17.17.27.47.47.67.67.57.37.3Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20187.176.96.86.86.86.87776.66.96.97.17.17.17.1Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20197.727.37.2776.97.17.37.37.47.67.57.57.57.677.727.72Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20207.017.937.897.847.847.877.847.757.757.757.647.627.627.367.067.017.01Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/20214.886.916.836.716.716.576.76.716.716.386.155.755.755.495.284.884.88Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202210.535.065.595.935.936.266.246.496.496.877.427.767.768.789.3510.5310.53Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/20239.3510.4510.4510.4910.4910.6410.710.7210.7210.710.6710.8310.8310.159.899.359.35Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/20249.419.249.279.369.369.249.319.359.359.579.489.639.639.649.749.419.41Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/20258.839.679.79.739.739.669.759.619.619.229.058.758.758.748.758.838.83Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/20268.588.388.278.278.368.348.478.478.648.65Up is Bad TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/2014NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201765.4664NC65.46NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201864.8170.51NC64.81NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201972.5266.11NC72.52NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202074.7471.52NC74.74NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202268.7572NC68.75NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202364.6868.0564.68Up is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202472.2462.6372.24Up is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202567.9463.4267.94Up is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202665.09Up is Good TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/2014NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201726.127.3NC26.1NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201827.2523.06NC27.25NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201919.425.89NC19.4NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202017.1121.41NC17.11NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202220.9119NC20.91NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202328.8322.4128.83Up is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202417.6126.0517.61Up is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202524.4328.4224.43Up is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202620.21Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2014/201511739992492221430927309274220059578750917509184624941939974299742104929112241117399117399Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2015/20164161228114692739273957401106115330153302027424597280462804633717362544161241612Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2016/201731188221548787662766295811549418670186702210824550264452644528009288453118831188Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2017/2018125339982488384938494607610672517251851388959575957510510113561263312533Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2018/201914036535695128512852255358047454745625072707950795011386133191403614036Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2019/2020145811195252030813081513962777017701776458797104281042811193124661458114581Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2020/20215689910860162862070520705234912596528940289403413939432436564365648360521365688956899Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2021/202229996164141557141714189691003512708127081474017842216552165524830275862999629996Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2022/202332573270766051002510025121341395816259162591908121461239702397028229302473257332573Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2023/202427845292846356277627787661137313821138211626217486209572095724351259992784527845Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2024/20251953116582135588058808018912411051110511212014147150781507816595174071953119531Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2025/2026280145996265626574478603102541025411236139221527115271Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2014/20151856352283849663677386773888554102823121670121670113647144486155684155684160620173757185635185635Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2015/20161584148581190823654236543427946253636816368183477102686115041115041134132147726158414158414Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2016/20171709291833028630413304133053539737268976189761102157114703123092123092141253150071170929170929Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2017/2018148987107742123641341413415372158479766477664786541103492112396112396123488139862148987148987Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2018/20191911641511228351418184181854503657969066790667108156125793144187144187147926175207191164191164Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2019/20201728831119625317388433884366558740548187981879101300119484132407132407146488162973172883172883Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2020/20212366391165130062434244342455110741869750897508120650149803168685168685177417203999236639236639Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2021/20222317622216045314594885948888817102763119112119112132206150855183705183705200008217181231762231762Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2022/20232925162315246313625516255186820111087135445135445158889184121207186207186254658274099292516292516Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2023/202431905723935527208790387903119514146989151551151551175363208150229415229415265840303421319057319057Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2024/202519949541460734609713797137133604139614146289146289154619166754173669173669182712191750199495199495Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2025/2026168702428134793347935344867423800758007586077106118119579119579Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2014/2015398753083489580588058159292156923984239842850027035285132851331230336873987539875Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2015/201626745113728156991699110171896111916119161453816821181971819723123239022674526745Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2016/2017239576893115081208412084126931297615735157351698117711196491964921625229892395723957Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2017/201818557807797501104411044115241330014659146591538316047163421634217597179961855718557Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2018/20191883210199112391242412424143501409815790157901666817844181321813217796177961883218832Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2019/202089855456632064266426752974047435743581578543860786079094901989858985Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2020/2021109984273446451885188579850526297629764377756883588351035599991099810998Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2021/202210738233822982298229828022745319731973197354438843884492953541073810738Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2022/202318910356453625889588957105150547854781250867077092709211596115091891018910Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2023/202474064114287432853285304024212530253045822867582558256164629274067406Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2024/2025120102487630932143214426942694972497269278565628362836510111331201012010Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2025/202653245324101771017774547584744374438423874085798579Up is Bad YCC013YFAS Number of Food vouchers - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015747243636515970707373747474747474Neutral YCC013YFAS Number of Food vouchers - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNeutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2014/20153180300683998998132816471988198822302432260526052803299231803180Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2015/20161325901552552552932935825827208519589581091119713251325Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2016/20171256461652842843804966156157298269249241043111212561256Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2017/2018115978194279279376495589589681764863863974107411591159Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2018/201913281101732492493634705715717218539429421064120013281328Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2019/202092430176270270420478535535598734845845906924924924Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2020/202117072524015355356337518758759381112124612461444155617071707Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2021/202213181092082842844094725925926348099429421063116413181318Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2022/20231507112248364364467574626626813967108910891300133015071507Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2023/20241262631722912913884955845846998139319311081116612621262Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2024/2025105311320227427437944851751762572279679688793810531053Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2025/202689151260260325422487487529669763763Neutral YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201612.0511.1511.5911.5911.8312.1612.1611.8912.0412.0411.912.1312.0512.05Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201711.2612.0711.8612.1312.1312.0811.9712.0112.0111.9212.0311.511.511.6311.4911.2611.26Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018NC11.2410.9710.7410.7411.18NC11.2311.2310.9610.82NCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201911.9810.911.4512.2511.98Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202010.5811.2610.4410.310.58Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202110.7611.4811.9911.3910.76Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20228.599.928.598.298.59Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20238.298.048.799.218.29Up is Bad APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20140Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCNeutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20160.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20190.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20200.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20210.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20220.05Neutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCNeutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024N/CNeutral APSE073Cemetery and Crematorium: Hectares of cemetery land maintained per 10,000 head of population (PI 18)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NCNeutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018NCNCNeutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201927.2420.326.431.7327.0929.7625.4128.7428.0225.2328.236.7830.2928.9120.6119.5423.62Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202025.8622.9122.6220.2822.0420.1522.526.8823.1124.7933.5330.1929.9831.6122.1932.3429.08Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/202131.5933.6234.2535.7234.6629.9230.6935.1332.132.0235.937.0434.9230.523.8223.5526.12Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202223.3820.1527.0516.2620.9815.923.2120.6219.7326.4825.9530.4827.4628.6724.5224.525.64Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/202317.4426.2816.6813.7518.7615.7517.9712.3315.4610.5417.0417.6314.8219.1522.4418.8620.02Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/202417.9816.0717.1320.6818.1818.7718.7315.9917.7522.0615.8221.5419.519.7115.0814.316.49Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/202513.2613.098.3313.1411.4911.3512.314.2312.5114.9116.189.5513.4616.8312.420.6216.14Neutral ASC01b% of contacts to ASC Community Team that are resolved with information/advice/guidance (IAG)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/202619.32NANANANANANANANANANANANeutral ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018NCUp is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20195.724.94.84.14.15.175.124.944.9454.864.524.524.985.315.725.72Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20204.875.15.065.25.25.165.144.844.844.674.43.853.853.823.944.874.87Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/20215.365.315.965.695.695.876.457.147.147.77.457.937.937.125.975.365.36Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/20228.265.675.486.076.075.396.135.755.756.86.576.966.967.877.848.268.26Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/202311.997.817.747.457.457.38.28.678.679.329.8510.5310.5311.4411.1111.9911.99Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/202411.2311.5311.612.2212.2212.0411.1210.6410.6411.0811.3311.6811.6811.3911.5611.2311.23Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/202510.0511.2610.9810.8510.8510.7510.6510.0810.0810.439.99.659.6510.039.3810.0510.05Up is Good ASC01fPercentage of reviews that result in a recommendation to reduce level of formal care and support (rolling 12 months)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/20269.979.169.519.519.389.519.059.059.39.9610.710.7Up is Good ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202021232149213421352135216621962209220921872170216921692169214321232123Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/202121582154216122092209219922262258225822502253222222222154214721582158Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202220372153217621792179216421322123212321112106208420842068206320372037Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/202320902034205720712071207620962114211420902092206820682064207320902090Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/202420652070209020822082209720892088208820912087207820782052206320652065Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/202521162052207620892089204920702081208120952102209920992077210421162116Neutral ASC14Total number of Adults receiving paid packages of care - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/2026210021012097209721132127211721172145212921402140Neutral ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201875Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201979Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202076Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202180Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202279Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202378Up is Good ASCOF1B1aPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Disabled People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202481Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201868Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201973Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202072Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202173Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202271Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202377Up is Good ASCOF1B1bPercentage of people who use services who have control over their daily life - Older People (ASC User Survey)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202476Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2011/201273.1Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2012/201363.2Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2013/201482.6Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2014/201591.8Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2015/201682.681.881.88281.981.981.781.781.881.681.581.381.581.681.684.282.47Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2016/201782.2684.184.384.584.384.6884.298484.3284.1681.4481.7282.4479.3379.7680.6579.91Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2017/20188280.1879.779.779.8679.5979.4179.0179.3378.9678.4177.5378.2977.3177.2977.0777.22Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2018/201981.477.1277.1276.2376.8276.3176.3876.3876.3676.1376.2876.0576.1574.9374.9374.9374.93Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2019/202081.8Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2020/202184.1NAUp is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2021/202284.8Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2022/202384.4Up is Good ASCOF1GProportion of adults with a learning disability who live in their own home or with familyAnnualFinancial Year2023/202485.8Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201253.9Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201363.9Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201468.7Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201555.1Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201628.5Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201739.2120.2220.5321.2620.6937.5538.0538.9738.1944.6746.4946.2245.8350.4652.6453.2452.14Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20186948475249586770577981816582828369Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20198483838483868685858584838483838284Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20208084828283818180828080808179787780Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/20217378777677757372757371717471716873Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/20224653535152484745474544444442414141Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/20233440393638373535373535343632312535Up is Good ASCOF1HProportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support (New definition from 2021/22)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/20243024302830242427232222252120Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2013/201443Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2014/201546.6Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2015/201645.8Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2016/201749.5Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2017/201844.5Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2018/201943.4Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2019/202045.5Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2020/202135.4Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2021/202239.7Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2022/202341.3Up is Good ASCOF1I1Proportion of people who use services who reported that they had as much social contact as they would likeAnnualFinancial Year2023/202450.2Up is Good ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20127Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20137.7Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201411.5Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20159.9Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201611.32.282.283.053.053.816.097.617.618.379.910.6610.6613.714.4616.7516.75Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201711.180.750.752.252.25333.763.765.266.018.268.269.0111.2711.2711.27Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201815.71.493.734.474.475.966.717.457.458.9511.9313.4213.4214.1615.6516.416.4Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201910.43.735.226.716.717.457.458.958.9511.1812.6714.1614.1615.6515.6515.6515.65Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202019.22.984.477.457.458.9511.1812.6712.6713.4214.9114.9114.9116.419.3819.3819.38Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202113.32.243.735.225.225.227.459.699.6911.9311.9313.4213.4214.1614.9114.9114.91Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202222.1Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202316.4Up is Bad ASCOF2A1Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20248.3Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201611.422.2800.763.050.762.281.524.570.761.520.763.053.050.762.286.09Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201711.270.7501.52.250.7500.751.51.50.752.254.50.752.2503Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201815.71.492.240.754.481.490.750.752.981.492.981.495.960.751.490.752.99Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201910.43.731.491.496.710.7501.492.242.241.491.495.221.49001.49Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020NC2.981.492.987.451.492.241.495.220.751.4902.241.492.9804.47Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NC2.241.491.495.2202.242.244.472.2401.493.730.750.7501.49Up is Bad ASCOF2A1aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (younger adults) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/20221.491.494.477.452.241.491.495.22Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012608.4Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013617.7Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014767.5Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015630.8Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016683.176.8126.17202.97202.97255.08312.68394.96394.96430.62474.51543.08543.08606.16658.27713.13713.13Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017647.891.8148.5189189251.1299.7372.6372.6407.7456.3515.7515.7569.7629.1669.6669.6Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018649.445.3295.97162.62162.62215.94287.92349.23349.23394.55447.87546.51546.51586.49634.48655.81655.81Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019668.693.31186.61239.93239.93303.91354.56399.88399.88466.53517.18567.83567.83623.82645.14671.8671.8Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020539.658.65130.63181.28181.28261.26317.24346.57346.57378.56418.54453.2453.2495.85530.51546.51546.51Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021347.329.3242.6571.9871.98106.64146.62191.94191.94221.27261.26333.24333.24378.56415.88458.53458.53Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022499Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023479.5Up is Bad ASCOF2A2Long-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024524.2Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016693.9376.849.3776.8202.9752.1157.682.28191.9935.6643.8868.57148.1163.0852.1154.86170.05Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017656.191.856.740.518962.148.672.9183.635.148.659.4143.15459.440.5153.9Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018649.445.3250.6566.65162.6253.3271.9861.32186.6245.3253.3298.64197.2839.9947.9921.33109.31Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019668.693.3193.3153.32239.9363.9850.6545.32159.9566.6550.6550.65167.9555.9821.3326.66103.97Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020NC58.6571.9850.65181.2879.9855.9829.32165.2831.9939.9934.66106.6431.9934.661682.64Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NC29.3213.3329.3271.9834.6639.9945.32119.9629.3239.9971.98141.2945.3237.3242.65125.3Up is Bad ASCOF2A2aLong-term support needs met by admission to residential and nursing care homes, per 100,000 population (older people) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202242.6550.6547.99141.2950.6539.9916106.64Up is Bad ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012100Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2012/201369.8Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2013/201480.9Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2014/201581.5Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2015/201675.7Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2016/201779.25Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2017/201892.5Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2018/201983Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2019/202080.6Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2020/202184.8Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2021/202288.2Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2022/202383.6Up is Good ASCOF2B1Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were still at home 91 days after discharge from hospital into reablement/rehabilitation servicesAnnualFinancial Year2023/202491.2Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2011/20120.4Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2012/20130.7Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2013/20141.1Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2014/20150.9Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2015/20162.2Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.78Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.8Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2018/20190.7Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2019/20200.5Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2020/20210.5Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2021/20220.5Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2022/20231.1Up is Good ASCOF2B2Proportion of older people (65 and over) who were offered reablement services following discharge from hospitalAnnualFinancial Year2023/20241.9Up is Good ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201217.3Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201318.2Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201417.6Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201511.69.1511.9813.0113.0112.3512.5613.0113.0113.1613.5713.1513.1512.8712.1411.8911.89Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201613.26.559.5310.7310.7310.8811.3211.8211.8211.4112.0712.3212.3213.2913.3113.3613.36Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201716.8518.2216.1617.6317.6317.6317.8718.0218.0218.1318.5918.0218.0217.2216.7216.8516.85Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201813.514.513.412.112.111.411.411.911.912.112.413.113.113.313.413.513.5Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201917.319.818.819.219.217.417.617.717.71817.817.717.717.617.617.517.5Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202015.421.821.120.320.318.717.517.317.316.71615.615.615.715.6Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022Up is Bad ASCOF2C1Delayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201613.366.5512.5113.1110.7211.3213.1114.312.918.9416.6814.313.3122.0511.3216.0916.49Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201716.8518.2214.120.5717.6317.6318.8118.8118.4118.8121.7413.5218.029.9911.7518.2213.32Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201813.514.512.39.612.19.111.414.611.713.214.518.715.514.915.113.914.6Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201917.319.817.82019.211.818.318.616.219.416.617.217.716.716.91716.7Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202021.820.518.520.314.212.71614.313.510.912.712.416.115.2Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022Up is Bad ASCOF2C1aDelayed transfers of care from hospital, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/20123.2Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201310.7Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201411.1Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/20156.34.273.965.085.085.795.986.26.26.627.097.257.257.086.66.356.35Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20166.92.383.874.774.775.365.365.865.865.966.186.166.166.976.836.956.95Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20177.499.48.239.999.999.999.649.319.318.99.048.758.758.117.647.497.49Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20186.45.85.14.64.64.64.55.25.25.666.56.56.56.56.46.4Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20196.67.37.67.97.96.97.27.47.47.57.57.27.276.86.66.6Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20204.95.35.45.95.95.85.65.65.65.55.15555Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022Up is Bad ASCOF2C2Delayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (YTD Average)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20166.952.385.366.554.767.155.368.346.956.557.755.966.7514.35.368.349.33Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20177.499.47.0513.529.999.998.237.648.626.469.996.467.632.352.945.883.72Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20186.45.84.43.74.64.64.38.45.87.98.810.396.86.44.86Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20196.67.388.47.94.18.28.678.17.456.84.65.64.24.8Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20205.35.47.15.95.54.95.75.44.52.643.75.34.8Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022Up is Bad ASCOF2C2aDelayed transfers of care from hospital which are attributable to adult social care, per 100,000 population (New definition from 2017/18) - (Monthly Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2011/201264Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2012/201365.8Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2013/201467.4Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2014/201567.1Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2015/201664Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2016/201762.4Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2017/201862.9Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2018/201963.8Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2019/202068.1Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2020/202172.3Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2021/202265.1Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2022/202366.5Up is Good ASCOF3AOverall satisfaction of people who use services with their care and supportAnnualFinancial Year2023/202465.1Up is Good BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2010/20110Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2011/201227Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2012/201336Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2013/201415Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2014/20153Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2015/20160000Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017298Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018546Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019713Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020832Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021685Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022367Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023119Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024140Up is Bad BW06aNo of council homes in York failing to meet the decency standardAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025144144Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201144Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201237.04Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201334.42Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201429.51Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.07Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201628.02Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201728.7Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201827.61Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201927.6Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202027.6Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202121.5NANANAUp is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202225.1NAUp is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202324.1Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202423.4Up is Bad CAN027Average Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202518.2Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201149.98Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201243.61Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201340.61Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201434.36Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201535.08Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201630.81Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201732.6Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201829.94Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201929.7Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202029.9Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202121.9NANANAUp is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202225.5NAUp is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202324.4Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202421.8Up is Bad CAN027aAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202520.4Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201152.07Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201246.36Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201343.28Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201437.79Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201538.18Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201635.02Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201736Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201833.14Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201933.7Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202033.3Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202125.8NANANAUp is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202228.7NAUp is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202327.9Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202425.8Up is Bad CAN027bAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202522.3Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201147.51Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201237.34Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201335.37Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201431.05Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.71Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201628.91Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201729.9Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201827.33Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201927.3Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202027.3Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202120.7NANANAUp is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202222.8NAUp is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202321.7Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202420.1Up is Bad CAN027cAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202519.5Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201144.57Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201242.84Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201339.6Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201435.67Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201534.34Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201631.44Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201732.4Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201829.87Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201929.6Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202029.8Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202122.5NANANAUp is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202225NAUp is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202323.8Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202422.2Up is Bad CAN027dAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202520Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201142.88Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201236.18Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201333.19Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201428.03Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201530.09Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201628.49Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201727.4Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201826.93Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201925.4Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202025.9Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202119NANANAUp is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202219.2NAUp is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202319.2Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202419.5Up is Bad CAN027eAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202518Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201151.33Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201249.48Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201342.98Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201438.38Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201540.47Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201635.16Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201735.8Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201833.26Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201934.2Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202033.8Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202128.5NANANAUp is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202232.7NAUp is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202333Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202429.8Up is Bad CAN027fAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202523.2Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201174.86Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201262.32Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201352.43Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201445.49Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201549.67Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201643.87Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201745.2Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201842.79Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201946.1Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202046.5Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202136.7NANANAUp is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202239.1NAUp is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202340.6Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202434.4Up is Bad CAN027gAverage Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202525.5Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201146.63Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201241.6Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201339.91Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201436.08Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201537.6Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201631.85Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201734.7Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201831.72Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201931.8Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202031.4Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202124.4NANANAUp is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202229.2NAUp is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202328.45Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202427Up is Bad CAN028The maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Salisbury Terrace (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202520.9Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201166.14Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201257.71Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201350.96Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201440.83Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201542Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201637.51Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201736.9Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201836.35Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201935.6Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202037.4Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202127.2NANANAUp is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202232.8NAUp is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202330.62Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202425.7Up is Bad CAN028aThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Prices/Nunnery Lane (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202524.8Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201173.37Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201262.49Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201354.23Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201451.59Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201549.18Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201646.92Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201747.7Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201845.86Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201946.3Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202045.5Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202135NANANAUp is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202243.5NAUp is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202341.33Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202437.1Up is Bad CAN028bThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Blossom St/Holgate (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202532.4Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201156.68Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201248.06Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201345.51Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201439.97Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201545.22Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201637.68Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201737.5Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201836.24Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201936.1Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202037.8Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202129.2NANANAUp is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202232.9NAUp is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202330.39Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202428.8Up is Bad CAN028cThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fishergate/Paragon (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202525.4Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201155.63Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201262.64Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201356.46Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201447.45Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201546.97Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201644.59Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201742.7Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201842.78Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201941.8Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202038.9Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202132.5NANANAUp is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202233.7NAUp is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202333.77Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202430.9Up is Bad CAN028dThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Lawrence St (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202528.1Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201155.76Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201246.34Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201343.16Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201436.29Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201539.46Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201636.83Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201735.5Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201835.25Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201932.7Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202033.1Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202124.6NANANAUp is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202225.4NAUp is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202325.97Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202425Up is Bad CAN028eThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Fulford (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202523.9Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201161.36Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201262.01Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201361.67Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201450.71Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201552.17Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201647.13Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201747.5Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201843.93Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201946.6Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202044.3Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202140.2NANANAUp is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202247.5NAUp is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202347.26Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202442.6Up is Bad CAN028fThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Gillygate / LMW (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202531.1Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201181.38Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201268.85Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201361.75Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201450.85Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201554.75Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201647.98Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201749.9Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201845.77Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201945.5Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202046.7Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202138.8NANANAUp is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202240.5NAUp is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202343.73Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202436.6Up is Bad CAN028gThe maximum Nitrogen Dioxide concentration in Rougier St/GHS (ug/m3) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202528.5Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2005/20066.96.9Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20076.96.9Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20086.36.3Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20096.16.1Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20105.65.6Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20115.85.8Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20125.25.2Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20135.45.4Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20145.25.2Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20154.74.7Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20164.54.5Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20174.34.3Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201844Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20193.93.9Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20203.83.8Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20213.4Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20223.9Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20233.5Up is Bad CES020CO2 emissions (tonnes) per head of population (within LA scope) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20243.2Up is Bad CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2009100Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2010116Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2011126Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2012138Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2013151Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2014156Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2015145Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2016149Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2017141Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2018147Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2019141Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2020117Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2021107Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2022115Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2023114Up is Good CES28Index of cycling activity (%) (12 hour) from 2009 Baseline (26,210 (Calendar Year) (LI 2c(ii))AnnualCalendar Year2024102Up is Good CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2003/20043.7Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2004/20053.5Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2005/20064.9Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2006/20075.6Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2007/20086Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2008/20094.7Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2009/20105Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2010/20115Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2011/20125Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2012/20133.8Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2013/20143.5Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2014/20152.9Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2015/20162.8Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2016/20172.5Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2017/20183.4Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2018/20194.6Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2019/20203.9Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2020/20213.5Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2021/20222.8Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2022/20233.1Up is Bad CHP01Infant mortality rate (under 1 year old), per 1,000 live birthsAnnualFinancial Year2023/20243.2Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012NCUp is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/201312.9Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/201410.8Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/201510.4Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/20169.5Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.7Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/201812.8Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/201913.9Up is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020NCUp is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad CHP02Child mortality rate (1-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2007/200824.1Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2008/200924.1Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2009/201024.1Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2010/201124.1Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2011/201224.7Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2012/201324.7Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2013/201424.7Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2014/201516.4Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2015/201616.4Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2016/201715.9Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2017/201815.9Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2018/201918.9Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2019/202018.9Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2020/202118.9Up is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad CHP18% of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decayFive YearsFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20110.9Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20121Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20131.3Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20141.3Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20150.7Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20160.9Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20170.8Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20180.9Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20190.6Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20200.9Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20210.9Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20231Up is Bad CHP21Teenage mothers (delivery episodes aged under 18)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2010/201153.1Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/201261Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/201363.2Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/201463.4Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/201572.2Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/201693.1Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017100.9Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/201888.5Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/201983.6Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/202072Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/202167.5Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/202242.3Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/202333Up is Bad CHP23Hospital admissions due to substance misue (15-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/202426.5Up is Bad CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201173.66Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201273.36Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201373.99Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201469Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NANeutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201777.1Neutral CHP25% of mothers who give their babies breast milk in the first 48 hours after delivery (breastfeeding initiation)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018NCNeutral CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022603.6Up is Bad CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023601.7Up is Bad CHP27A&E attendances (0-4 years), per 1,000 attendancesAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024603.5Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2010/2011108.8Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012103.3Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013109.4Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014111.2Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015121.9Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016140.8Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017136.4Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018136.8Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019126.7Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/202094.7Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/202184Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/202291.6Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/202381.8Up is Bad CHP29Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in young people (aged 15-24 years), per 10,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/202467.6Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014142.7Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015129.7Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016103.7Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017143.3Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018157.3Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019132.4Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020119.4Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/202139.9Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/202280.2Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023107Up is Bad CHP30Hospital admissions for asthma (0-18 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024120.4Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2010/201142.4Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/201255.6Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013111.6Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/201497.3Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015111Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016180.7Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017111.6Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/201898.5Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019127.4Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/202099.1Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021114.1Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022173Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023144.8Up is Bad CHP31Hospital admissions for mental health conditions (0-17 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024115.6Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012338.81Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013435Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014407.79Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015562.5Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016692.03Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017658.1Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018565.64Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019508.04Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020365.08Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021457.38Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022390.86Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023254.51Up is Bad CHP32Hospital admissions as a result of self harm (10-24 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024178.3Up is Bad CHP34aAbsolute gap in % of children totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks between highest and lowest York ward (4 year aggregated ward data)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202136.5Up is Bad CHP34aAbsolute gap in % of children totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks between highest and lowest York ward (4 year aggregated ward data)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202236.7Up is Bad CHP34aAbsolute gap in % of children totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks between highest and lowest York ward (4 year aggregated ward data)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202338.98Up is Bad CHP34aAbsolute gap in % of children totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks between highest and lowest York ward (4 year aggregated ward data)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202439.3Up is Bad CHP34aAbsolute gap in % of children totally or partially breastfeeding at 6-8 weeks between highest and lowest York ward (4 year aggregated ward data)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202536.43Up is Bad CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/2014153.23132.92140.04153.23Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015307.08158.83153.54248.84307.08Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016468.52314.67458.03492.99468.52Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/2017538548453458538Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018454373372418454Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/2019482412455435482Up is Good CMHD02IAPT Referrals (18+), per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/2020504443504Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201455.8859.8457.3255.88Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201561.460.9858.0660.9861.4Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201663.6460.6761.0658.5463.64Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201767.853.259.362.167.8Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201865.168.267.666.165.1Up is Good CMHD03% of people who have completed IAPT treatment who achieved reliable improvement" - (VoY CCG)"QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201970.474.671.76370.1Up is Good CMHD05People entering IAPT (in month) as % of those estimated to have anxiety/depression (VoY CCG) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20177.513.28.47.57.5Neutral CMHD05People entering IAPT (in month) as % of those estimated to have anxiety/depression (VoY CCG) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201815.57.78.611.311.39.811.110.410.410.612.510.610.616.114.615.515.5Neutral CMHD05People entering IAPT (in month) as % of those estimated to have anxiety/depression (VoY CCG) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201914.414.611.514.814.81515.413.413.415.71.216.716.716.313.214.414.4Neutral CMHD05People entering IAPT (in month) as % of those estimated to have anxiety/depression (VoY CCG) - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20201813.418Neutral CMHP15ANumber of bed days in secondary mental health care hospitals, per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20144786.444976.024975.665069.744786.44Up is Bad CMHP15ANumber of bed days in secondary mental health care hospitals, per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20158285.595022.715282.146566.948285.89Up is Bad CMHP15ANumber of bed days in secondary mental health care hospitals, per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20164989.346522.55971.825997.174989.34Up is Bad CMHP15ANumber of bed days in secondary mental health care hospitals, per 100,000 population - (VoY CCG)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20174252.324413.084285.164324.924252.32Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2006/20072.6Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2007/20082.3Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2008/20092.2Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2009/20102.2Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2010/20112.2Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/20121.6Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/20132.2Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20142.3Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015321.4Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20161.7Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20172.6Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20182.4Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20193.5Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20202.7Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/20211.5Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20221.8Up is Bad CSB14% of total births where low birth weight recorded (under 2500g) - (term babies)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20232.7Up is Bad CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2010/201195.8Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/201295.25Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201396.25Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201495.78Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201595.1595.794.3NC96.3Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20169695.893.694.695.1Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201796.376.495.696.495.5Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201895.61Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201995.86Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202095.17Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202195.59Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202293.54Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202394.5Up is Good CSB15Population vaccination coverage - Dtap / IPV / Hib (2 year old)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202496Up is Good CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015521820104Up is Bad CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016226781Up is Bad CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201843116818Up is Bad CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad CSB16Hospital admissions for dental caries ages 1-4 years (‘children presenting at York ED with dental issues’ until 2016)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/2020NAUp is Bad CSB16aHospital admissions for dental caries (0-4 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015368.7Up is Bad CSB16aHospital admissions for dental caries (0-4 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016342.9Up is Bad CSB16aHospital admissions for dental caries (0-4 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017353.55Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018480.2Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019534.3Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020507Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021418.1Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022277.4Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023126.6Up is Bad CSB16bHospital admissions for dental caries (0-5 years), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2023/202464.8Up is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015263797Up is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20163371484Up is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201713Up is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018NC2Up is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad CSB17Number of mothers recorded by Midwifery Services in regard to alcohol or substance misuse (by Estimated Delivery Date)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/2020NAUp is Bad CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20153891301076983Neutral CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201625578547350Neutral CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201713025412044Neutral CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201819246664040Neutral CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201922946634575Neutral CSB38Number of children provided with one-to-one support by IDASQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202012698Neutral CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2009/20101632Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2010/20111726Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2011/20121953Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2012/20131593149130122401122112132366151140143434117135140392Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2013/20141530121114119354125168132425161123133417107114113334Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2014/20151808113133158404177216135528158155197510128113125366Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2015/201615181281181333791631531354511381071273728591140316Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017139999137148384154124108386122981313519075113278Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018111510780892761001271293561008676262736484221Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2018/20199998176842417610593274907592257777674227Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2019/20209037889712386893672289187100278475557159Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2020/202155737233191726256190533110218647182590Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022656575369179676144172604776183393944122Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2022/20234233644381183333309619323889324741120Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2023/2024625454144130636569197394551135384778163Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2024/2025729594973181728168221584669173604351154Up is Bad CSP29aNumber of Incidents of ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2025/202657514315179875021648547Up is Bad CSP29bNumber of Incidents of Alcohol Related ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017594336648147695352174493663148423449125Up is Bad CSP29bNumber of Incidents of Alcohol Related ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018NC5435421313750431303633NCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad CSP29bNumber of Incidents of Alcohol Related ASB within the CIZMonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019NANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANAUp is Bad EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2012/20131062Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2013/20141728Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2014/20151683Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2015/20161457Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2016/20171864Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2017/20181986Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2018/20191691Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2019/20201737Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2020/20211225Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2021/20221250Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2022/20231378Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2023/20241266Up is Good EH1Chlamydia detection rate per 100,000 aged 15 to 24AnnualFinancial Year2024/20251191Up is Good EH1AChlamydia diagnoses (15-19 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201419221344153218141922Up is Good EH1AChlamydia diagnoses (15-19 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201514161756164015321416Up is Good EH1AChlamydia diagnoses (15-19 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201613661438Up is Good EH1BChlamydia diagnoses (20-24 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201417341200150816741734Up is Good EH1BChlamydia diagnoses (20-24 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201514951793162315041495Up is Good EH1BChlamydia diagnoses (20-24 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201614531518Up is Good EH1BChlamydia diagnoses (20-24 year olds), per 100,000 populationQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018457Up is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2021/202226.5Up is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2022/202321Up is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2023/202417.1Up is Good EH2Proportion of population aged 15 to 24 screened for chlamydia (%) - FemalesAnnualFinancial Year2024/202515.8Up is Good HLTH01aPupils achieving a Good Level of Development at age 5 (%)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201464.8Up is Good HLTH01aPupils achieving a Good Level of Development at age 5 (%)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201774.3Up is Good HLTH02aLimiting long term illness or disability (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201515.3Up is Bad HLTH03aProvision of 1 hour or more unpaid care per week (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20159.2Up is Bad HLTH04aPensioners living alone (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.3Up is Bad HLTH05aObese adults (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201523Up is Bad HLTH06aBinge drinking adults (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201529.7Up is Bad HLTH07aHealthy eating adults (%)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201528.3Up is Good HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015104.3Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201697.1Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018141.3Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020153.8Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021141.1Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024145Up is Bad HLTH14bAbsolute gap in mortality ratio for deaths from circulatory disease (under 75) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Aug 2026Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20157.6Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20167.3Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201810.1Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202010.2Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202111.7Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202410.4Up is Bad HLTH21bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Males between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Aug 2026Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20158.3Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20166.6Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20187.9Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20208.2Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202111.1Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20248.1Up is Bad HLTH22bGap in years in Life Expectancy at birth for Females between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Aug 2026Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201597.1Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016110.2Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018126.2Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020133.2Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021119.6Up is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad HLTH35bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for self-harm between highest and lowest York MSOA ( 5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Aug 2026Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201555.6Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201659.2Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201870.7Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202188.8Up is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad HLTH36bAbsolute gap in hospital admission ratio for alcohol-related harm (narrow definition) between highest and lowest York MSOA (5 year aggregated) - (ward gap prior to 2023/24)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Aug 2026Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/202069380Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/202152740Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/202263245Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Up is Bad HLTH54Hospital admissions - Residents: TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/202030775Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/202122880Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/202227890Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Up is Bad HLTH54aHospital admissions - Residents: Male TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/202038605Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/202129855Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/202235350Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Up is Bad HLTH54bHospital admissions - Residents: Female TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/20207240Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/20214930Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/20226395Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Up is Bad HLTH54cHospital admissions - Residents: 0 - 17 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/202032215Neutral HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/202125585Neutral HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/202229625Neutral HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Neutral HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Neutral HLTH54dHospital admissions - Residents:18 - 64 TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Neutral HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2019/202029925Up is Bad HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2020/202122225Up is Bad HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2021/202227230Up is Bad HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023Up is Bad HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Up is Bad HLTH54eHospital admissions - Residents: 65+ TotalAnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Up is Bad HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201674.423.3562.645974.4Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201778.374.3270.1473.778.3Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201885.6184.285.484.785.61Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201985.98788.288.785.9Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202087.7886.3387.3986.6287.78Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202177.6255.0959.7173.6777.62Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202266.7579.6883.5483.6966.75Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202386.2672.3284.7386.5786.26Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202474.285.2487.9182.9474.2Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202562.2470.9668.0166.6762.24Up is Good HV01% of births that receive a face to face New Birth Visit (NBV) by a Health Visitor within 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202684.6284.08Up is Good HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201621.767.9830.573521.7Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201712.7721.2119.6417.712.77Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20189.9112.310.111.99.91Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201911.711.710.59.611.7Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202010.2312.2311.0411.7410.23Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202121.8237.9739.0726.121.82Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202232.2118.7215.515.1132.21Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202312.8727.6813.7912.4412.87Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202425.2213.9312.0915.4925.22Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202535.9927.1231.1832.2835.99Up is Bad HV02% of face-to-face NBVs undertaken by a health visitor after 14 daysQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202613.3912.85Up is Bad HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201670.861.5463.166570.8Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201777.0975.2278.9677.877.09Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201882.4682.783.183.282.46Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201989.285.386.488.489.2Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202087.5988.5588.8988.5687.59Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202188.6982.2684.1987.5288.69Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202285.4487.9487.248785.44Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20238686.4786.8484.8386Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202482.568788.7486.7482.56Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202586.2286.1980.586.0886.22Up is Good HV03% of infants who received a 6-8 week review by the time they were 8 weeksQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202686.2983.78Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201630.130.5925.822130.1Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201744.2334.0336.8735.744.23Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201843.1544.544.342.343.15Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201949.3844.645.748.6749.38Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202048.3946.9245.6350.8948.39Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202149.145.0145.7350.349.1Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202248.5247.853.1448.4348.52Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202350.8650.3852.6549.7950.86Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202451.1650.595053.9351.16Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202554.6351.6748.3951.6554.63Up is Good HV04% of infants being breastfed at 6-8wksQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202647.9751.6Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201616.7718.1620.811820.4Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201741.6523.9821.662541.65Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201872.2165.7736972.21Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201981.878.479.883.881.8Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202086.1483.1583.8686.2986.14Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202168.5681.8985.7580.7868.56Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202288.3864.1885.2293.488.38Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202388.9593.2393.1292.7588.95Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202492.6895.3692.8992.2792.68Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202591.5294.4688.9592.0691.52Up is Good HV05% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 12 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202693.8391.49Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20167022.2232.234770Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201776.9268.9474.8174.576.92Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201881.5279.480.281.981.52Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201984.778.580.582.484.7Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202086.7686.4984.683.4886.76Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202184.187.2383.3386.1484.1Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202293.679.4967.6786.7793.6Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202393.1390.5494.0694.4293.13Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202495.4992.6696.191.8195.49Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202594.2792.3796.3392.694.27Up is Good HV06% of children who received a 12 month review by the time they turned 15 monthsQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202694.5493.57Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201611.67.4510.821511.6Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201718.5522.3923.0816.118.55Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201862.644646.362.162.64Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201971.260.870.669.871.2Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202072.6572.6171.3776.2872.65Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202174.1678.2776.2585.2574.16Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202285.0451.1641.7783.1785.04Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202387.1985.3486.6789.887.19Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202491.3488.0888.4690.7191.34Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202587.6588.9289.590.8687.65Up is Good HV07% of children who received a 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202691.4192.48Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201652.257.953.850.552.2Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201759.455.256.75459.4Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201854.7356.85653.854.73Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201959.456.65758.759.4Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202059.0958.0456.6560.1459.09Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202158.3357.6757.0759.4858.33Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202259.4357.2262.8758.6359.43Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202361.7959.4762.3162.361.79Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202464.5260.6260.4463.6664.52Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202566.6764.263.5562.5766.67Up is Good HV10% of infants totally or partially breastfed at 6-8 weeks (of those with a known feeding status)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202659.4365.22Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201990.5589.0588.3390.1190.55Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202093.8886.989.3488.2493.88Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202184.2192.9892.3590.4384.21Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202288.5786.6490.189.4688.57Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202390.2486.6188.2986.1290.24Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202492.3990.2995.5791.8292.39Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202592.4591.8990.9693.4492.45Up is Good HV12% of children who were at or above the expected level of development at the 2-2½ year reviewQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202691.1994.65Up is Good HV24aAbsolute gap in % of children who reach expected level of development at 2-2.5 years of age between highest and lowest York ward (4 yr aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NAUp is Bad HV24aAbsolute gap in % of children who reach expected level of development at 2-2.5 years of age between highest and lowest York ward (4 yr aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202213.1Up is Bad HV24aAbsolute gap in % of children who reach expected level of development at 2-2.5 years of age between highest and lowest York ward (4 yr aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202313.65Up is Bad HV24aAbsolute gap in % of children who reach expected level of development at 2-2.5 years of age between highest and lowest York ward (4 yr aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202410.53Up is Bad HV24aAbsolute gap in % of children who reach expected level of development at 2-2.5 years of age between highest and lowest York ward (4 yr aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20259.6Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2009/20109.63Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2010/201110.16Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2011/201211.52Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2012/201311.91Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2013/201411.69Up is Bad LAPE01Months of life lost due to alcohol: Males aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2014/201510.3Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2009/20104Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2010/20114.55Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2011/20124.97Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2012/20135.54Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2013/20145.65Up is Bad LAPE02Months of life lost due to alcohol: Females aged less than 75 yearsAnnualFinancial Year2014/20155.4Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201013.08Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201112.79Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201212.88Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201313.28Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201412.79Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201512.88Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201613.28Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201711.59Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201816.1Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201914.3Up is Bad LAPE03Alcohol-specific mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202012.2Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20104.8Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20115.52Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20125.76Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.83Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20146.44Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20156.11Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20166.41Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20175.62Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20184.2Up is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019NAUp is Bad LAPE04Alcohol-specific mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20204.3Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201750.8Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201858.8Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201955.1Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202053.7Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202160.7Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202248.2Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202368.4Up is Bad LAPE07Alcohol-related mortality: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202465.5Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201721.2Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201813.6Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201915.2Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202018.8Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202115Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202221Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202326.7Up is Bad LAPE08Alcohol-related mortality: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New Methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202417.7Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201537.1Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201641.7Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201746.4Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201841.9Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201928.1Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202023.5Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202128.4Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202238.1Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202333.5Up is Bad LAPE09Under 18s admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202429.9Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017878Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018917Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20191172Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20201039Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021884Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022981Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023993Up is Bad LAPE10Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Males, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20241141Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017445Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018398Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019509Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020518Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021496Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022579Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023491Up is Bad LAPE11Admitted to hospital with alcohol-specific conditions: Females, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024496Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20172411Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20182912Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20193103Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20203057Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20212468Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20222913Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20232976Up is Bad LAPE12Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20243401Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017978Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018968Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20191084Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20201118Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021942Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20221075Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20231001Up is Bad LAPE13Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20241063Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017710Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018772Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019688Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020699Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021602Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022675Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023618Up is Bad LAPE14Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Males, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024782Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017390Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018381Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019444Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020414Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021326Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022298Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023261Up is Bad LAPE15Admitted to hospital with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Females, all ages (per 100,000 population) - (New methodology)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024285Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20091412Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20101415Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20111464Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20121425Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20131619Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20141998Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20152020Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20162171Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20172263Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20182372Up is Bad LAPE16Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Broad): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20192536Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/2009447Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/2010462Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/2011444Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012462Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013595Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014659Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015636Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016661Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017691Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018724Up is Bad LAPE17Admitted to hospital episodes with alcohol-related conditions (Narrow): Persons, all ages (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019713Up is Bad LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201431.423.632.630.831.4Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201531.634.232.234.331.6Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016403233.936.940Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201738.1936.8139.3237.2738.19Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201833.535.2532.8834.0833.5Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201931.0730.129.6533.0731.07Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202032.1132.3630.631.0332.11Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202127.131.8631.9629.3427.1Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202226.531.0130.428.4726.5Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202326.6322.0123.8427.0726.63Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202425.7529.4826.0524.2825.75Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202521.0321.7123.5127.0721.03Up is Good LAPE22% of alcohol users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202621.5225.61Up is Good LDHC08% of adults with a learning disability having a GP Health Check - (VoY CCG)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201433Up is Good LDHC08% of adults with a learning disability having a GP Health Check - (VoY CCG)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201551Up is Good LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018221.28200.51212.05251.27221.28Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019230.24244.64238.93241.73241.77241.86228.08224.1231.35219.82213.75152.59195.39247.14238.95271.32252.47Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020223228216245203Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202139060904Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022239162236118442Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023263.1233.39240.52237341.51Neutral LM01aThroughput of visits to leisure facilities (GLL) - All Facilities (Average per 1,000 Population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024334.64374.14323.69283.25357.49Neutral NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20088.19Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20096.69Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20105.43Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20117.45Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20128.59Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20138.08Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20147.82Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20157.11Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20168.59Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20178.52Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189.28Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20199.54Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20207.6Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20228.9Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20237.8Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20248.8Up is Bad NCMP01% of reception year children recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20259.93Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200816.51Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200917.05Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201014.07Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201114.71Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201216.39Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201316.34Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201415.44Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201515.09Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201615.14Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201716.13Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201817.41Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201915.07Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202022.1Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202218.87Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202318.7Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202419.2Up is Bad NCMP02% of children in Year 6 recorded as being obese (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202519.33Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200822.61Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200917.06Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201014.41Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201117.59Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201222.17Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201321Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201422.43Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201519.14Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201622.37Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201720.83Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201824.07Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201923.65Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202021.4Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202222.7Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202319.9Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202422.8Up is Bad NCMP03% of reception year children recorded as being overweight (incl. obese) (single year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202523.18Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20117.22Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201214.55Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.08Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20144.4Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20157.8Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20167.5Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20177.6Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20188.1Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20199.5Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20209.5Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20226.8Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20235.66Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202410.92Up is Bad NCMP09aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded obesity between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20258.2Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201121.38Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201216.36Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201311.17Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201412.8Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201510.6Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201611.6Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201711.6Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201814.8Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201914.1Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202011Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202213.9Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202311.63Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202415.44Up is Bad NCMP11aAbsolute gap in % of Reception recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202511.38Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201118.35Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201218.79Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201315.22Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201412.6Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201512.9Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201615.5Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201718.6Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201815.9Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201919.8Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202024.2Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021NCUp is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202224.4Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202324.68Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202422.84Up is Bad NCMP12aAbsolute gap in % of Year 6 recorded overweight (incl. obesity) between highest and lowest York ward (3 year aggregated)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202518.58Up is Bad NGPP01Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupationsAnnualFinancial Year2012/20138.07Neutral NGPP01Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupationsAnnualFinancial Year2013/201413.66Neutral NGPP01Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupationsAnnualFinancial Year2014/201515.24Neutral NGPP01Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupationsAnnualFinancial Year2015/201613.19Neutral NGPP01Gap in smoking prevalence rate between adult general population and adults in routine and manual occupationsAnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.09Neutral NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2008/20092666.6Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2009/20102901Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2010/20112778.9Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2011/20123051.5Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2012/20132576.3Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2013/20142671.8Up is Bad NHSOF01Potential Years of Life Lost from causes amenable to healthcare (DSR), per 100,000 populationAnnualFinancial Year2014/20152273.6Up is Bad PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2016/201760.4Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2017/201862.260.460.360.560.560.560.861.161.161.262.4626262.462.462.262.2Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2018/201960.562.363.363.163.163.464.264.464.463.26362.262.261.46160.560.5Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2019/202057.259.758.958.758.758.759.358.858.859.358.357.757.757.757.557.257.2Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2020/202153.255.454.153.453.453.753.853.853.853.953.253.153.152.252.153.253.2Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2021/202255.153.554.254.154.154.755.3555555.355.254.754.753.954.655.155.1Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2022/202356.15555.255.555.555.555.65656575756.256.255.155.256.156.1Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2023/202454.555.655.3555555.155.255.255.254.754.954.354.353.954.154.554.5Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2024/202556.654.254.354.854.854.654.554.755.656.756.856.556.356.6Up is Good PHE11Estimated dementia diagnosis rate (%) for people aged 65+ as recorded on practice disease registersMonthlyFinancial Year2025/202656.357Up is Good PHOF01% of physically active and inactive adults - active adults AnnualFinancial Year2012/201361.54Up is Good PHOF01% of physically active and inactive adults - active adults AnnualFinancial Year2013/201466.16Up is Good PHOF01% of physically active and inactive adults - active adults AnnualFinancial Year2014/201562.18Up is Good PHOF01% of physically active and inactive adults - active adults AnnualFinancial Year2015/201669.83Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201666.71Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201772.03Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201876.4Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201975.16Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202070.92Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202169.29Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202275.2Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202373.6Up is Good PHOF01a% of adults (aged 19+) that meet CMO recommendations for physical activity (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202478.6Up is Good PHOF02% of active and inactive adults - inactive adults AnnualFinancial Year2012/201323.67Up is Bad PHOF02% of active and inactive adults - inactive adults AnnualFinancial Year2013/201421.09Up is Bad PHOF02% of active and inactive adults - inactive adults AnnualFinancial Year2014/201521.57Up is Bad PHOF02% of active and inactive adults - inactive adults AnnualFinancial Year2015/201617.54Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201621.1Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201718.3Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201813.8Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201915.8Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202017.6Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202121.2Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202215.4Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202316.3Up is Bad PHOF02a% of adults (aged 19+) that are physically inactive (<30 moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202410.8Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012461.73Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013594.09Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014657.5Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015633.84Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016658.5Up is Bad PHOF03Alcohol related admissions to hospital (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017687Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2008/200935.8Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2009/201027.7Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2010/20112727.1Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/201225.321.427.825.217.6Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201322.9628.513.432.219.2Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201421.5921.721.424.117.7Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201515.7110.520.913.322Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201620.4124.518.916.315.2Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201714.816.615.112.5Up is Bad PHOF06Under 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Calendar Year)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201815.6Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201421.421.4Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201516.518.618.515.716.5Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201618.82019.620.418.8Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201716.816.815.814.816.8Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20181314.814.315.613Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201917.213.715.816.117.2Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202015.918.216.816.415.9Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/20219.915.112.812.49.9Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202212.19.910.910.212.1Up is Bad PHOF06aUnder 18 conceptions (per 1,000 females aged 15-17) (Rolling 12 Months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/2023Due April 2613.113.613.6Due April 26Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201113.9Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201214.1Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201313.8Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201410.7Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201511.2Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201612.3Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201711.1Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201810.4Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201911.6Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202010.4Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202110.3Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20228Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20238.1Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20246.2Up is Bad PHOF10% of women who smoke at the time of delivery - (CYC)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20254.74.15.944.8Up is Bad PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201465.13Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201566.05Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201665.99Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201766.16Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201864.83Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201965.97Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202066.34Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202165.8Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202266.15Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202364.08Up is Good PHOF101Healthy life expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202462.68Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201463.91Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201565.17Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201665.15Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201765.29Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201864.44Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201964.82Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202065.23Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202164.67Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202265.15Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202363.61Up is Good PHOF102Healthy life expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202462.01Up is Good PHOF11Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201420.933.339.6715.0720.93Up is Good PHOF11Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201538.1122.5326.6831.838.11Up is Good PHOF11Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201670.6748.435763.470.67Up is Good PHOF11Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201772.571.9172.272.272.5Up is Good PHOF11Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201872.772.572.672.772.7Up is Good PHOF11bCumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201441.5446.9145.7543.7741.54Up is Good PHOF11bCumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201539.3541.7541.6441.1239.35Up is Good PHOF11bCumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201637.5739.3238.6337.8137.57Up is Good PHOF11bCumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201737.437.4737.337.437.4Up is Good PHOF11bCumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201837.837.637.637.737.8Up is Good PHOF12Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20148.691.564.426.68.69Up is Good PHOF12Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201514.999.4111.1113.0714.99Up is Good PHOF12Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201626.5519.0422.0223.9726.55Up is Good PHOF12Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201727.126.9526.92727.1Up is Good PHOF12Cumulative % of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (5 year period April 2013 to March 2018)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201827.527.327.327.427.5Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/200481.82Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/200582.04Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/200682.61Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/200782.98Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/200883.17Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/200982.94Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/201082.9Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/201182.71Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/201282.93Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/201383.04Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201483.37Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201583.37Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201683.4Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201783.4Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201883.42Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201983.27Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202083.55Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202183.49Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202283.62Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202383.37Up is Good PHOF16Life Expectancy at birth - FemaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202483.61Up is Good PHOF162Smoking prevalence in adults (18-64) - socio-economic gap in current smokers (APS) RatioAnnualFinancial Year2016/20173.43Up is Bad PHOF162Smoking prevalence in adults (18-64) - socio-economic gap in current smokers (APS) RatioAnnualFinancial Year2017/20185.31Up is Bad PHOF162Smoking prevalence in adults (18-64) - socio-economic gap in current smokers (APS) RatioAnnualFinancial Year2018/20191.89Up is Bad PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20151771Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20161806Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20171810Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20181825Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20191902Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20201866Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20212032Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20221900Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20232010Neutral PHOF169Number of Deaths Registered for York Residents (ONS)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20241953Neutral PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20146.23Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20155.46Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20164.49Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20174.26Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20185.35Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20196.41Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20206.22Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20215.94Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20226.15Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20236.73Up is Bad PHOF17Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Female - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20246.71Up is Bad PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2001/20022412Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2002/20032402Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2003/20042467Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2004/20052332Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2005/20062189Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20072343Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20082230Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20092259Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20102308Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20112300Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20122412Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20132375Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20142363Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20152323Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20162407Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20172510Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20182496Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20192624Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20202574Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20212683Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20222636Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20232740Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20242710Neutral PHOF170No. of Deaths Registered by York Register Office (CYC & non CYC residents)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20252703Neutral PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2013/201493.04Up is Good PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2014/201591.4Up is Good PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2015/201696.24Up is Good PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NAUp is Good PHOF171Newborn bloodspot screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018NAUp is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2013/201499.4Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2014/201599.2Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2015/201699.5Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NAUp is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2017/201899.7Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2018/201999.7Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2019/202098.9Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2020/202198.9Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2021/202299.9Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2022/202399.5Up is Good PHOF172Newborn hearing screening - coverageAnnualFinancial Year2023/202499.5Up is Good PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201225.4Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201325.7Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201434.4Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.8Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201628.1Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201726.4Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201824.6Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201918.6Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202026.9Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202122.3Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202220.9Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202315.2Up is Bad PHOF187 Smoking prevalence among adults aged 18-64 in routine and manual occupations (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202418.8Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201215.5Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201317Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201418.7Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201517.2Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201614.6Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.6Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201911.5Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202011.9Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202111.7Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20229.2Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20238.7Up is Bad PHOF188Smoking Prevalence in adults (18+) - current smokers (APS) (2020 definition)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20248.1Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20122.42Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20131.84Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20143.05Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20152.91Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20162.74Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20173.43Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20185.31Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20191.89Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20204.85Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20212.47Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20223.75Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20232.19Up is Bad PHOF189Smoking in routine & manual v other occupations (ratio)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20243.3Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201325.7Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201434.4Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201532.8Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201628.2Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201726.4Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201824.6Up is Bad PHOF20% of population smoking (routine and manual workers) (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201918.6Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2010/20112272Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2011/20122143Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2012/20132040Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2013/20142098Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2014/20152110Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2015/20162346Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2016/20172279Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2017/20182253Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2018/20192519Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2019/20202487Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2020/20212215Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2021/20222065Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2022/20232009Up is Bad PHOF21Emergency hospital admissions due to falls in people aged 65 and over – All PersonsAnnualFinancial Year2023/20242058Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2011/20125.04Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2012/20135.04Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2013/20145.04Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2014/20155.04Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2015/20165.04Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2016/20175.51Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2017/20185.51Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2018/20195.51Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2019/20205.51Up is Bad PHOF24% of the population exposed to road, rail and air transport noise of 55 dB(A) or more during the night-timeFive YearsFinancial Year2021/20225.51Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/20106.5Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/20117.3Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20123.4Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.2Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20142.9Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20152.2Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20161.9Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20175.1Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20182.6Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20193.6Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20203.4Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20212.4Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20221.7Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20232Up is Bad PHOF27Under 18 conceptions: conceptions in those aged under 16 (per 1,000 females aged 13-15) (Calendar Year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024Due May 26Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201199.3Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201299.5Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201395.7Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014100.4Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015111.8Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016104.7Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017121.1Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018133.2Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019121.1Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020101.5Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202182.3Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202287Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202389.5Up is Bad PHOF28Hospital admissions caused by unintentional and deliberate injuries in children (aged 0-14 years) (per 10,000 resident population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202482.8Up is Bad PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201182.72Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201282.91Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201382.44Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201481.42Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201580.63Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201680Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201779.9Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201879.6Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201978.9Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202079.69Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202179.92Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202264.76Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202371.75Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202472.55Up is Good PHOF29Cancer screening coverage - breast cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3 years)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202575.5Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201177.38Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201276.93Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201375.97Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201474.75Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201574.69Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201673.69Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201773.8Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201873Up is Good PHOF30Cancer screening coverage - cervical cancer (% eligible women screened adequately within previous 3.5 or 5.5 years)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201971.7Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/20148.71.62.92.22.1Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20157.31.71.721.9Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20169.82.3322.6Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20170.2000.10.1Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20180.40.20.10.10.1Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20192.30.10.60.70.9Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20202.40.70.60.70.5Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202100000Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20221.9000.61.3Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20234.20.60.81.21.7Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20243.61.40.70.60.8Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/20253.70.50.40.62.1Up is Good PHOF31% of eligible population aged 40-74 who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/20261.3Up is Good PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2003/20047.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2004/20058.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2005/20069.2Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20078.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20087.8Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/20099.4Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201010Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201110.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20129.3Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20138.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201411.3Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201511.1Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201614Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.9Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201813.5Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201911.9Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202011.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202113.3Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202213.4Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202312.9Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/20249.7Up is Bad PHOF32Suicide rate (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2024/20258.7Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2001/200225.7Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2002/200319.5Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2003/200415.2Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2004/200519.6Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2005/200614.5Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20079.2Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200817.3Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200934.5Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201019.1Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201123.5Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201214.5Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201315.6Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201414.7Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201516.8Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201626.2Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201731Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201831.9Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201915.3Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020-4.7Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202145.3Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20228Up is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024NCUp is Bad PHOF33Excess Winter Deaths Index (all ages single year)AnnualFinancial Year2024/2025Due Feb 26Up is Bad PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/200476.84Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/200577.28Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/200677.26Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/200777.79Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/200878.31Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/200978.97Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/201079.15Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/201179.36Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/201279.23Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/201379.47Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201479.34Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201580.05Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201680.2Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201780.34Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201880.12Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201980.04Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202080.11Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202179.82Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202279.81Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202379.47Up is Good PHOF36Life Expectancy at birth - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202479.77Up is Good PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20146.65Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20155.7Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20167.25Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20178.15Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189.34Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20198.78Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20208.62Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20218.84Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20229.84Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202310.57Up is Bad PHOF37Slope index of inequality in life expectancy at birth - Male - (Three year period)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202410.08Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2010/201113.5Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2011/201214.1Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/201314.3Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201415.9Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201513.1Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20161316.920.821.313Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201716.1114.8614.3514.6616.1116.11Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201815.1915.1515.515.6415.6415.6515.4415.6515.6515.915.9415.4915.4915.5115.2115.1915.19Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201913.9614.9815.22151515.114.8314.5814.5814.614.2714.1914.1914.5214.5513.9613.96Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202014.1513.914.0313.9413.9413.9214.3114.3414.3414.2714.7914.5214.5214.0514.0214.1514.15Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/202112.7614.1414.2414.2514.2513.9213.8113.8513.8513.7213.8113.3813.3813.0912.9112.7612.76Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202213.1512.7212.4112.1612.1612.4112.3312.5212.5213.0212.9312.8512.8512.912.9913.1513.15Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/202313.112.913.513.713.713.513.814.614.614.213.413.313.313.31313.113.1Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/202414.913.313.513.713.713.514.414.614.615.515.715.615.615.614.614.914.9Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/202514.914.914.615151514.614.714.714.914.614.414.414.514.314.914.9Up is Bad PHOF39Average Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) score of the emotional and behavioural health of children in care for more than 1 year aged 4-16 - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/20261515.114.914.914.914.914.514.514.714.714.414.4Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2011/201264Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2012/201363Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2013/201463Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2014/201563.2Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2015/201669.3Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2016/201768.5Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2017/201863.9Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2018/201956.4Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2019/202058Up is Bad PHOF40Gap in employment rate for mental health clients and the overall employment rateAnnualFinancial Year2020/202156.6Up is Bad PHOF44% of adults classified as overweight or obeseAnnualFinancial Year2014/201556.88Up is Bad PHOF44% of adults classified as overweight or obeseAnnualFinancial Year2015/201656.4Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201659.3Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201758.9Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201856.5Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201957.2Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202062.2Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202163.6Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202259.5Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202363.3Up is Bad PHOF44a% of adults (aged 18+) classified as overweight or obese (New definition)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202460.1Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201317.01Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201418.72Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201517.24Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201614.63Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201712.6Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20189Up is Bad PHOF45% of population smoking (APS)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201911.5Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2003/2004170.8Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2004/2005162.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2005/2006160.9Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2006/2007152.8Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2007/2008147.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2008/2009136.8Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2009/2010131.7Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2010/2011132.1Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012137.4Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013141Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014147.1Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015139.2Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016135.3Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017126.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018130.5Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019132.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020135.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021144.4Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022153.2Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023158.6Up is Bad PHOF46Under 75 mortality rate from causes considered preventable (2019 definition) (Persons, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024152.4Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2003/2004130.6Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2004/2005119.3Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2005/2006109.1Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2006/200799.4Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200893.7Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200985.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201078.3Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201177Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201275.5Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201372.1Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201473.3Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201569.4Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201667.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201765.1Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201864.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201967.5Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202065.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202166.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202265Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202368.8Up is Bad PHOF49Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population, 3 year range)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202465.9Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/2004186.2Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/2005170.3Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/2006157.4Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/2007147.5Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/2008138.8Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/2009127.2Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/2010117.8Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/2011116.6Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012119.3Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013114.1Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014115.4Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015101.6Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201698Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201792.8Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201894.5Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201996Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202091.7Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202192.5Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202291.9Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023102.3Up is Bad PHOF50Under 75 mortality rate from all cardiovascular diseases (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202496.7Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2003/2004157.8Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2004/2005152.3Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2005/2006151.5Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2006/2007144.8Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2007/2008146.3Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/2009141.3Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/2010142Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/2011138.5Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/2012146.3Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/2013149.5Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/2014149.8Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/2015139.9Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/2016130.4Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/2017130.5Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/2018132.9Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/2019133.9Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/2020132Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/2021128.2Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/2022134Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/2023131Up is Bad PHOF55Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/2024130.9Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/2004190Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/2005180.4Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/2006188.2Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/2007175.6Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/2008170Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/2009154.9Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/2010154.8Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/2011152.5Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/2012160.1Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/2013163.6Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/2014170.8Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015162.7Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/2016154Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017145.5Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018147.8Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/2019142.8Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/2020146.4Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/2021141.7Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/2022152.6Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023144.7Up is Bad PHOF56Under 75 mortality rate from cancer - 3 year (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024141.3Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2003/200411.3Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2004/200514.5Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2005/200613.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2006/200715.3Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200815.7Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200914.5Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201013.2Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201111.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201213.4Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201315.1Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201413.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201513.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201615.2Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201716.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201816.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201914.9Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202013.9Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202114.4Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202214.3Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202318.8Up is Bad PHOF61Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202419.5Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/200413.5Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/200516.1Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/200618Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/200720.7Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/200822.7Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/200920.3Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/201018.6Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/201115Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/201215.4Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/201316.7Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201416.1Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201516.4Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201618.4Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201720.2Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201823.2Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201920.9Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202018.5Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202116.4Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202215.7Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202322.1Up is Bad PHOF62Under 75 mortality rate from liver disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202425.5Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2003/200432.8Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2004/200530.6Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2005/200630.7Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2006/200727Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2007/200826.2Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200926.1Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201029.2Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201132.2Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2011/201233.2Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2012/201331.9Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2013/201432.6Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2014/201531.1Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2015/201630.8Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201728.1Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201829.1Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201933.2Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202033.8Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2020/202131Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202223.8Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202323.5Up is Bad PHOF66Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202425.6Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2003/200442.7Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2004/200536.2Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2005/200635.7Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2006/200735.5Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2007/200833.5Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2008/200933.9Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2009/201035.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2010/201136.6Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2011/201236.8Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2012/201335.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2013/201437.2Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2014/201535.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2015/201632Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2016/201729.9Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2017/201831Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2018/201937.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2019/202035.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2020/202134.3Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2021/202225.1Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2022/202326.8Up is Bad PHOF67Under 75 mortality rate from respiratory disease (per 100,000 population) - MaleAnnualFinancial Year2023/202428.7Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2003/20047.1Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2004/20057.8Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2005/20067.5Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2006/20078.2Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2007/20089Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2008/200911.6Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2009/201011.8Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2010/201110.9Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2011/20128.3Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2012/20136.2Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2013/20145.5Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2014/20154.2Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2015/20165.8Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2016/20175.9Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2017/20186.7Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2018/20198.4Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2019/20209Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20219.9Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2021/20226.9Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2022/20239.2Up is Bad PHOF72Mortality from communicable diseases per 100,000 population (3 year period)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202411.2Up is Bad PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201476.45.16.27Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/20155.26.266.15.2Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20165.55.56.15.95.5Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20179.396.077.978.059.39Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20186.39.398.797.756.3Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20194.75.525.294.74.7Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20206.344.574.555.166.34Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/20213.46.55.334.963.4Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20224.383.864.033.594.38Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20235.423.825.535.355.42Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20244.45.454.235.374.4Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/20252.994.24.093.382.99Up is Good PHOF76% of opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/20263.293.34Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201434.630.931.130.534.6Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201540.136.535.638.840.1Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201631.13834.833.331.1Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201738.0832.5137.9337.8938.08Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201832.1136.9333.9129.9632.11Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201929.230.3326.6131.529.2Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202027.7128.7132.4931.8427.71Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202129.329.327.6728.9729.3Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202226.527.6129.728.7326.5Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20232024.7821.419.9220Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202419.5221.9922.2223.319.52Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202517.1416.517.715.8417.14Up is Good PHOF77% of non-opiate users in treatment who successfully completed drug treatment (without representation within 6 months)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202618.7223.59Up is Good PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2011/201243.5Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2012/201338.5Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2013/201442.3Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2014/201544.4Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2015/201652.9Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2016/201746.7Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2017/201847.1Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2018/201950Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2019/202058.3Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2020/202180Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2021/202283.3Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023100Up is Bad PHOF79HIV late diagnosisAnnualFinancial Year2023/202450Up is Bad PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201420.93.36.35.45.9Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201519.64.14.15.16.3Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201628.15.98.66.47.3Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/20170.80.20.30.10.2Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/20180.40.20.10.10.1Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201925.39.23.66.36.2Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202017.53.72.74.76.4Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202100000Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20221.9000.61.3Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20235.30.71.21.42Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20244.41.810.80.8Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/20254.50.70.50.82.5Up is Good PHOF91% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/20261.3Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201441.546.945.140.235.8Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201537.342.741.138.430.4Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201634.939.134.730.535.4Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201721.45.9010041.9Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018100100100100100Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20199.21.615.711.714.1Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202013.919.32114.87.1Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202100000Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202210000100100Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202379.87964.285.985Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202481.481708097Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202581.681807784Up is Good PHOF92% of eligible population aged 40-74 offered an NHS Health Check who received an NHS Health Check (quarterly from April 2013)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202695Up is Good PHYS05% of Adults (aged 16+) who have taken part in sport and physical activity at least twice in the last 28 daysAnnualFinancial Year2016/201784.882.784.8Up is Good PHYS05% of Adults (aged 16+) who have taken part in sport and physical activity at least twice in the last 28 daysAnnualFinancial Year2017/201884.0185.2Up is Good PHYS05% of Adults (aged 16+) who have taken part in sport and physical activity at least twice in the last 28 daysAnnualFinancial Year2018/201987.78487.7Up is Good PHYS05% of Adults (aged 16+) who have taken part in sport and physical activity at least twice in the last 28 daysAnnualFinancial Year2019/202084.1Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2016/201770.267.971.01Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2017/201870.269.4Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2018/201974.973.1Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2019/202067.172.77Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2020/20216366.763Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2021/202266.566.566.5Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2022/202370.470.4Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2023/202469.869.8Up is Good PHYS06% of adults (aged 16+) that are physically active (150+ moderate intensity equivalent minutes per week, excl. gardening)AnnualFinancial Year2024/202576.576.5Up is Good POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2013/20142623Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2014/20152680Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2015/20162717Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2016/20172788Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2017/20182788Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2018/20192779Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2019/20202834Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2020/20212927Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2021/20222954Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2022/20233004Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2023/20243092Up is Bad POPPI01Total population aged 65 and over predicted to have dementiaAnnualFinancial Year2024/20253129Up is Bad PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2011/201296Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2012/201395Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2013/201493Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2014/201593Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/20169494949494Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201794.2594949495Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201893.892.791.294.994.2Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/20199396949489Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/20209598969595Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202189.2NC9397.789.2Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20228692858686Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202389.5939190.178.5Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2023/20249392929493Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202590909189.990Up is Good PP06% of food premises that are classified as broadly compliant - (YTD)QuarterlyFinancial Year2025/2026899190Up is Good PP07% of businesses that were compliant with legislation concerning the illegal use and sale of alcohol and tobaccoAnnualFinancial Year2011/201291Up is Good PP07% of businesses that were compliant with legislation concerning the illegal use and sale of alcohol and tobaccoAnnualFinancial Year2012/201398Up is Good PP07% of businesses that were compliant with legislation concerning the illegal use and sale of alcohol and tobaccoAnnualFinancial Year2013/201475Up is Good PP07% of businesses that were compliant with legislation concerning the illegal use and sale of alcohol and tobaccoAnnualFinancial Year2014/2015100Up is Good PP07% of businesses that were compliant with legislation concerning the illegal use and sale of alcohol and tobaccoAnnualFinancial Year2015/201663.2Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2011/201298Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2012/201399Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2013/20149998999999999998999998999997989798Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2014/201598979799989899989899989798989910099Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2015/20169898999998Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2016/20179897949796999896989899999898989998Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2017/201898100999899999997989998989898949696Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019989397979698989997999810099991009799Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2019/20209910099100100100981009910099989998989998Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021601001001271174046347587928583898686Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2021/20228784828283878586868393908791949092Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2022/20239385919490899095919798999893959695Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2023/202498989697979896989799999999969810098Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2024/202597949595959897979797971009895969896Up is Good PP08% of births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2025/20269596979696979897Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2011/2012100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2012/201399Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2013/2014100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017100100100NA100100NA100100NANANANA100NANA100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2023/2024100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2024/2025100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP09% of still births registered within 42 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2025/2026100100100100100100100100Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2011/2012100Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2012/201397Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2013/20149392929895979592959696889583949793Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2014/20159389939693969495949696859292939393Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2015/20169091929383Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2016/20178567828076998991939185798566909283Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2017/20188384948788949195939285788567827274Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2018/20198673807275818779828897909290969493Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2019/20208987879489928991918990858890909190Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2020/20218276778880899183888583748187838386Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2021/20227278847980797355696271746969856974Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2022/20234735594546425140444468475326575345Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2023/20244754595757626162625242444624303730Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2024/20256938293935443694589295879192939593Up is Good PP10% of deaths registered within 5 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2025/20268591868794949494Up is Good PVP01People supported through personal budgets or direct payments receiving community-based services (%) (ADASS Survey definition)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/201484.13Up is Good PVP01People supported through personal budgets or direct payments receiving community-based services (%) (ADASS Survey definition)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201591.2987.5387.9287.9291.1491.1488.0989.3388.5788.5789.2190.2591.2991.29Up is Good PVP01People supported through personal budgets or direct payments receiving community-based services (%) (ADASS Survey definition)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201693.8892.292.592.8192.593.1293.3293.5693.3394.2894.294.4994.3295.0795.3195.6695.35Up is Good PVP01People supported through personal budgets or direct payments receiving community-based services (%) (ADASS Survey definition)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NC91.3388.8691.8990.6988.3389.7286.9988.3589.68NCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Good PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/20152413120197022162058212019603016753Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201626028182874192130701316255423192062Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201724834211570231827681318225320221557Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20182461719256120272370172037741518841Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20192523535209024191760251919632181039Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20202012227196830211162121513401213631Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/20211721151127131517451115275317141647Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202221718192057242013571223175212182151Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/202321624251766222317621416144410112344Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/20242052314215816211855721134116142151Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/202524815202459212927771515154532171867Up is Bad PVP02Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for older people (65+)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/202626242373152113491912940Up is Bad PVP04Total number of Acute delayed discharges (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/20151204813251121427111912421051126Up is Bad PVP04Total number of Acute delayed discharges (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016189615163715172153620184425121855Up is Bad PVP04Total number of Acute delayed discharges (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017124161573858102310137301181433Up is Bad PVP04Total number of Acute delayed discharges (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018NA67922316726NANANANANANANANAUp is Bad PVP05Total number of reimbursable CYC delays (attributable to CYC) (YDH Only)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015115641222131111351516134482414Up is Bad PVP05Total number of reimbursable CYC delays (attributable to CYC) (YDH Only)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20161373911231291435111310342481345Up is Bad PVP05Total number of reimbursable CYC delays (attributable to CYC) (YDH Only)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20178915121138638175771943815Up is Bad PVP05Total number of reimbursable CYC delays (attributable to CYC) (YDH Only)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018NA62816115622NANANANANANANANAUp is Bad PVP06Reablement - assessments to be completed within 6 weeks of referralMonthlyFinancial Year2014/201526.8454.5539.292037.9563.6453.3358.4929.4126.6746.1534.0816.671053.8526.84Up is Good PVP06Reablement - assessments to be completed within 6 weeks of referralMonthlyFinancial Year2015/201621.6327.2730.7733.3330.4618.1833.332525.5255.8812.514.461533.33016.11Up is Good PVP06Reablement - assessments to be completed within 6 weeks of referralMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NC16.67012.59.72037.5101633.33NCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Good PVP07OT/OTA assessments - to be completed within 28 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2014/201595.8798.2897.6297.4497.7897.6499.7698.798.5398.4696.6797.8993.7596.4897.3795.87Up is Good PVP07OT/OTA assessments - to be completed within 28 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2015/201696.9797.1298.1195.897.0197.995.997.1296.9797.6496.9296.196.8997.4897.2296.3297.01Up is Good PVP07OT/OTA assessments - to be completed within 28 daysMonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017NC97.8497.0690.5795.1595.6291.7294.7894.0492.86NCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Good PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/20131784Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/20141753Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201514871810183018301806180613351448150115011508102714871487Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201617621764178317761774175617531765175817361741175417441751179717691772Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201718821945187918841902190019241899190718811896186718811850184018231837Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/201818811737171317171856171216981719185616881667162918601639162615771881Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201916651887188418821884188118691854186818401737169817581699166116351665Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/202016061737171317171719171216981719172516881667162916471639162615771606Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/202116871680173517731773181418061830183018531853182118211773175116871687Neutral PVP08People supported to live independently through social services PACKAGES OF CARE - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202217281680Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/20132822Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/20142570Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201526432550252025202582258227082688266826682690313526432643Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201624352444242224372434242824232415242224332427243024302451243924712454Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017931948958898935903906934914916922917918921987967958Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018857929922926904932962955917961945956892949951959857Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20191037912930924922933936920929935100310209861022104710421037Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020958929922926927932962955955961945956955949951959958Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021925908899900900873919933933922935946946931925925925Neutral PVP09People supported to live independently through social services PREVENTION - (Snapshot)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/2022937941Neutral PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2013/20141712.73Up is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2014/20151344.96Up is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2015/20161434.68Up is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2016/2017NCUp is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2017/2018NCUp is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2022/2023NCUp is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2023/2024150234772711401502Up is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2024/20252712483107218742712Up is Good PVP13No. of smokers who had successfully quit at 4 week follow up (self-report) per 100,000 smokers - YTDAnnualFinancial Year2025/2026511Up is Good PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/201514Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016224648Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/2017161124101221361304Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018222316211424281214Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/2019215229102332272002Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20202642410232712032406Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021203227033630251102Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/20223122610423921253137Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/2023271258141604041179Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/2024111102121422150000Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/2025182046222600111045Up is Bad PVP19Number of permanent admissions to residential & nursing care homes for younger people (18-64)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/2026223732276017Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015447226324136687013843848910655715505251646417264210891Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/201662003575254341316470506495147152247953515367374686721877Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/201735164793502431072224194304722239331293863231264364859Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018383026725726578923937938410023524253971174227287351865Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201962865584674801505335636487145854549162816645505355741659Up is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020NC727740634210165752056617434823684631313535375NCNCUp is Bad PVP26Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015286117631130479137831527496742519014776221510323341Up is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016202243128119290149121111381210298292800154193204551Up is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20172860270253324784200205270675272235297804151149237537Up is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/2018200418616711046313911222447519818923462119814899445Up is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/201918261991771995758592211388178177119474159129101389Up is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020NC1601471985059384117294551987161172121NCNCUp is Bad PVP27Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (YDH only)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad PVP28Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (TEWV only)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20173822296740750354853640514894525153741341196106187489Up is Bad PVP28Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (TEWV only)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20182156295211116622911131313357360247380310280229819Up is Bad PVP28Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (TEWV only)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20192708233274326833195243261699290188170648171130227528Up is Bad PVP28Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (TEWV only)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/2020NC212186119517273138213183173121477124193NCNCUp is Bad PVP28Delayed Transfers of Care: Total number of Non-acute delayed bed days (TEWV only)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2012/20136.5Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2013/20146.5Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/20157.8Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/20165.76.46.36.36.36.26.1665.75.65.55.55.45.55.75.7Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2016/20177.36.26.56.66.66.76.97.17.17.27.47.47.67.67.57.37.3Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2017/20187.176.96.86.86.86.87776.66.96.97.17.17.17.1Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2018/20197.727.37.2776.97.17.37.37.47.67.57.57.57.677.727.72Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2019/20207.017.937.897.847.847.877.847.757.757.757.647.627.627.367.067.017.01Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2020/20214.886.916.836.716.716.576.76.716.716.386.155.755.755.495.284.884.88Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2021/202210.535.065.595.935.936.266.246.496.496.877.427.767.768.789.3510.5310.53Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2022/20239.3510.4510.4510.4910.4910.6410.710.7210.7210.710.6710.8310.8310.159.899.359.35Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2023/20249.419.249.279.369.369.249.319.359.359.579.489.639.639.649.749.419.41Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2024/20258.839.679.79.739.739.669.759.619.619.229.058.758.758.748.758.838.83Up is Bad STF100bAverage Sickness Days per FTE - (Rolling 12 Month)MonthlyFinancial Year2025/20268.588.388.278.278.368.348.478.478.648.65Up is Bad TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/2014NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201765.4664NC65.46NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201864.8170.51NC64.81NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201972.5266.11NC72.52NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202074.7471.52NC74.74NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202268.7572NC68.75NCUp is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202364.6868.0564.68Up is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202472.2462.6372.24Up is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202567.9463.4267.94Up is Good TAP09a% of Talkabout panel confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202665.09Up is Good TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2012/2013NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2013/2014NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2014/2015NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201726.127.3NC26.1NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2017/201827.2523.06NC27.25NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201919.425.89NC19.4NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202017.1121.41NC17.11NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2020/2021NCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2021/202220.9119NC20.91NCUp is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2022/202328.8322.4128.83Up is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2023/202417.6126.0517.61Up is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2024/202524.4328.4224.43Up is Bad TAP09b% of Talkabout panel not confident they could find information on support available to help people live independentlyQuarterlyFinancial Year2025/202620.21Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2014/201511739992492221430927309274220059578750917509184624941939974299742104929112241117399117399Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2015/20164161228114692739273957401106115330153302027424597280462804633717362544161241612Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2016/201731188221548787662766295811549418670186702210824550264452644528009288453118831188Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2017/2018125339982488384938494607610672517251851388959575957510510113561263312533Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2018/201914036535695128512852255358047454745625072707950795011386133191403614036Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2019/2020145811195252030813081513962777017701776458797104281042811193124661458114581Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2020/20215689910860162862070520705234912596528940289403413939432436564365648360521365688956899Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2021/202229996164141557141714189691003512708127081474017842216552165524830275862999629996Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2022/202332573270766051002510025121341395816259162591908121461239702397028229302473257332573Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2023/202427845292846356277627787661137313821138211626217486209572095724351259992784527845Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2024/20251953116582135588058808018912411051110511212014147150781507816595174071953119531Up is Bad YCC001YFAS Emergency payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2025/2026280145996265626574478603102541025411236139221527115271Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2014/20151856352283849663677386773888554102823121670121670113647144486155684155684160620173757185635185635Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2015/20161584148581190823654236543427946253636816368183477102686115041115041134132147726158414158414Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2016/20171709291833028630413304133053539737268976189761102157114703123092123092141253150071170929170929Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2017/2018148987107742123641341413415372158479766477664786541103492112396112396123488139862148987148987Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2018/20191911641511228351418184181854503657969066790667108156125793144187144187147926175207191164191164Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2019/20201728831119625317388433884366558740548187981879101300119484132407132407146488162973172883172883Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2020/20212366391165130062434244342455110741869750897508120650149803168685168685177417203999236639236639Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2021/20222317622216045314594885948888817102763119112119112132206150855183705183705200008217181231762231762Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2022/20232925162315246313625516255186820111087135445135445158889184121207186207186254658274099292516292516Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2023/202431905723935527208790387903119514146989151551151551175363208150229415229415265840303421319057319057Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2024/202519949541460734609713797137133604139614146289146289154619166754173669173669182712191750199495199495Up is Bad YCC004YFAS Community payments (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2025/2026168702428134793347935344867423800758007586077106118119579119579Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2014/2015398753083489580588058159292156923984239842850027035285132851331230336873987539875Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2015/201626745113728156991699110171896111916119161453816821181971819723123239022674526745Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2016/2017239576893115081208412084126931297615735157351698117711196491964921625229892395723957Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2017/201818557807797501104411044115241330014659146591538316047163421634217597179961855718557Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2018/20191883210199112391242412424143501409815790157901666817844181321813217796177961883218832Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2019/202089855456632064266426752974047435743581578543860786079094901989858985Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2020/2021109984273446451885188579850526297629764377756883588351035599991099810998Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2021/202210738233822982298229828022745319731973197354438843884492953541073810738Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2022/202318910356453625889588957105150547854781250867077092709211596115091891018910Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2023/202474064114287432853285304024212530253045822867582558256164629274067406Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2024/2025120102487630932143214426942694972497269278565628362836510111331201012010Up is Bad YCC007YFAS CTS Discretionary (£) TOTAL - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2025/202653245324101771017774547584744374438423874085798579Up is Bad YCC013YFAS Number of Food vouchers - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2014/2015747243636515970707373747474747474Neutral YCC013YFAS Number of Food vouchers - (YTD)MonthlyFinancial Year2015/2016NCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNCNeutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2014/20153180300683998998132816471988198822302432260526052803299231803180Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2015/20161325901552552552932935825827208519589581091119713251325Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2016/20171256461652842843804966156157298269249241043111212561256Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2017/2018115978194279279376495589589681764863863974107411591159Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2018/201913281101732492493634705715717218539429421064120013281328Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2019/202092430176270270420478535535598734845845906924924924Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2020/202117072524015355356337518758759381112124612461444155617071707Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2021/202213181092082842844094725925926348099429421063116413181318Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2022/20231507112248364364467574626626813967108910891300133015071507Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2023/20241262631722912913884955845846998139319311081116612621262Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2024/2025105311320227427437944851751762572279679688793810531053Neutral YCC022Number of YFAS applications - Grand Total - (YTD)WeeklyFinancial Year2025/202689151260260325422487487529669763763Neutral YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2015/201612.0511.1511.5911.5911.8312.1612.1611.8912.0412.0411.912.1312.0512.05Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2016/201711.2612.0711.8612.1312.1312.0811.9712.0112.0111.9212.0311.511.511.6311.4911.2611.26Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2017/2018NC11.2410.9710.7410.7411.18NC11.2311.2310.9610.82NCNCNCNCNCNCUp is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2018/201911.9810.911.4512.2511.98Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2019/202010.5811.2610.4410.310.58Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2020/202110.7611.4811.9911.3910.76Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2021/20228.599.928.598.298.59Up is Bad YH13% of mothers smoking at time of delivery - (Rolling 12 Month)QuarterlyFinancial Year2022/20238.298.048.799.218.29Up is Bad